Archive for April, 2016

This Guy Is The Real Deal!

April 17, 2016

It’s hard to overstate the symbolic significance of events surrounding Pope Francis’ recent trip to a refugee camp on the Greek island of Lesbos last week. First of all, the media-savvy pontiff was well aware that his very visit would shed the light of the world’s press on the faces of these victims of the greatest human tragedy in our current time.

Secondly, of course, he not only  visited the refugee community he “walked his talk” by flying twelve Syrian refugees back to Rome. Even he admitted that this was but “a drop of water in the sea” of Europe’s migration crisis, but if every Christian community in the world would follow his model, there would be no refugee crisis anywhere in the world.

Related items got little attention: He made this visit with the Ecumenical Patriarch, Bartholomew, representing the Orthodox churches. This great man, often known as the “Green Patriarch” because of his strong environmental stands, was sadly neglected by most press reports and yet is the titular head of the second largest Christian communion in the world just as Francis is the actual leader of the largest. This ecumenical gesture is the latest in a movement toward healing the split between East and West in the Christian world which has existed for more than a thousand years.

Ecumenism extended to inter-religious awareness as the twelve Syrian refugees (members of three families) turned out to be Muslims, not Christians. This sends a clear message to the world about the need better to integrate Muslims into Western society because, Francis said, “Their privilege is that they are children of God.” In other words, human beings.

The Roman Catholic community of Sant’Egidio will actually welcome these refugees into their headquarters in Rome’s Trastevere neighborhood. I have worshiped, broken bread, and traveled with this amazing, primarily lay-led charitable community which has quietly led to instances reconciliation around the world and daily feeds and shelters members of the “Roma” (or gypsy) community in the city of Rome. They, like the Bishop of Rome, are examples of Christianity at its finest, putting flesh around the spirit of love demonstrated by the religion’s Founder.

Finally, just before his departure, the Pope met briefly with U.S. presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. Some have decried this as an openly political move by Sanders even while Pope Francis described it as “good manners and nothing more.” Actually, it was both. Sanders genuinely admires Francis’ “democratic socialism” (otherwise known as Catholic social teaching) and is married to a Roman Catholic.

But he could not have been unaware how this would have played with desired Catholic voters in New York who will be voting in the primary this Tuesday. Nor could Francis — again, extremely politically and socially aware — have failed to know what kind of signal he was sending about his admiration for (and support of?) Senator Sanders.

I just think this brief trip was an amazing and extremely effective gesture which reveals with startling clarity how the twin poles of “the Jesus Movement” (evangelism and reconciliation) so often spoken of by our own Presiding Bishop Michael Curry can come together seamlessly.

In the words of one young Facebook commentator on Pope Francis’ recent trip: “This guy is the real deal!”

Thoughts On “Amoris Laetitia”

April 9, 2016

I used to respect greatly  the Roman Catholic Church for having very high moral standards but — through the confessional and the care of pastors — being quite compassionate, forgiving and understanding to those of us (all of us!) who cannot live up to those standards. This seems to be the approach of Pope Francis in the new apostolic exhortation: “Amoris Laetitia;” The Joy of Love.

So, divorced persons married contrary to the discipline of the church may perhaps now be admitted to holy communion on a case-by-case basis, more on the discretion of local bishops and parish priests than annulment proceedings from the Vatican half a world away. This may, in fact, be the most important and most progressive proclamation in the document. But, while people who happen to be gay and others living in “irregular situations” may now be formally “welcomed” by the local church, will they really feel that way?

Cardinal Christoph Schonborn of Austria calls this “a classic example of the organic development of doctrine.” But is it really? It seems to me to be a restatement of traditional doctrine albeit wrapped in more compassionate and merciful language (which, of course, is surely to be applauded). But the question remains: does doctrine actually develop or  is it unchanging, merely to be expressed in different ways for each generation.

For example: while it made perfect sense for Jesus to outlaw divorce in a society where divorced women would be forced into the streets, destitute or even worse, does it make sense today? And, while it made perfect sense for Jesus to choose only male apostles in the patriarchal culture in which he lived, does it make sense today? And finally, while it made sense for Paul to be horrified at homosexuality when it was thought to be a “choice” engaged in by heterosexual pagans because of their unbridled lust, does it make sense today when the science of homosexuality and the example of so many faithful gay couples are before us?

I believe the answer to those questions is “No.” I have the utmost respect for the Bishop of Rome and the church he serves. But I believe that they — and other Christian communions including my own — have much more work to do in understanding how church doctrine can and does indeed develop, how it always has, and how the church can best minister to and with all people today, holding on to the principles of love and compassion Jesus taught, but living them out in different ways in the very different societies in which we live.

For Gay, Ian, and Rosalie

April 8, 2016

Words of encouragement from this evening’s Lesson for Evening Prayer (I Peter 3:13-4:6) for the three courageous Episcopal Church’s representatives on the Anglican  Consultative Council:

“Do not fear what they fear, and do not be intimidated, but in your hearts sanctify Christ as Lord. Always be ready to make your defense to anyone who demands from you an accounting of the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and reverence.”

“Keep your conscience clear, so that, when you are maligned, those who abuse you for your good conduct in Christ may be put to shame. For it is better to suffer for doing good, if suffering should be God’s will, than to suffer for doing evil.”

Stay strong, my sisters and brothers!

Intentional Discipleship in the Anglican Communion

April 6, 2016

Just finished reading “Intentional Discipleship and Disciple-Making: An Anglican Guide for Christian Life and Formation.” This is required reading for the Anglican Consultative Council members who will be meeting next week in Africa. The editors of the various articles contained in the 117 page volume are The Rev. Canon John Kafwanka and The Rev. Canon Mark Oxbrow. Forward and Preface by The Most Rev. Ng Moon Hing, Primate of the Church of the Province of South East Asia and The Archbishop of Canterbury, respectively. Those names alone will give a hint as to its perspective and content.

The first eight chapters deal with discipleship viewed through the following lenses: Biblical Theology, discipleship in the early church, Roman Catholic theology, discipleship in the Orthodox tradition, Anglican formation, the Five Marks of Mission, healing and discipleship, and the role of the “instruments of the Anglican Communion.”

The final nine chapters deal with case studies from Africa, Asia, Europe, The Americas; children and youth; Bible and sacraments; discipleship resources, mission and development agencies ; and, finally,”making the case for intentional discipleship in the Communion. The content of the volume is quite mixed from my perspective, but probably accurately reflects the varying contexts around the Anglican world.

A fairly balanced critique predictably finds North America and Europe suffering from a kind of “spiritual malaise” and living in a post-Christendom environment but Africa, Asia and the “developing world” also face some criticism for relying on vast numbers alone without following up with adequate Christian formation and training for discipleship. Witness the corruption in some Provinces and the tragedy in Rwanda to see extreme examples of this.

The little book is well worth the read. For surely, regardless of our cultural perspective, all can agree that we need to do a better job of turning “followers” into “disciples” and “disciples” into “apostles.” A focus on resources which emphasize Bible study, sacramental worship, small groups, and mission outside the doors of the church cannot be all bad.

 

 

 

“Politicized Cop-Talk?”

April 5, 2016

So, the National Border Patrol Council has endorsed Donald Trump for President! According to the New York Times today the Council said, “There is no greater physical or economic threat today than our open borders…” Really?

Yet today, the editorial continues: “…the border is more militarized than ever, and arrests there are at historic lows. Illegal immigration has been falling for years. More Mexicans are leaving the country than entering. President Obama, far from abandoning immigration enforcement, has deported more people — more than two million — more quickly than his predecessors.”

While, as a Democrat (and a Christian) I take no pride in that last statistic, it at least puts the lie to the claim that this President is turning a blind eye to illegal immigration and that “rapists and drug smugglers” are pouring across our southern border. That is simply not true. And, one would think, members of the Border Patrol, of all people, would know that.

Instead, they are choosing to support an ignorant demagogue with racist views and and a cynical strategy to win power for himself by playing on the fears and worst instincts of the American electorate. The council’s podcast “The Green Line” apparently majors in this kind of anti-Obama rhetoric. This sickens me, especially when sponsored by a union is made up entirely of members paid by my tax dollars.

I try to give the benefit of the doubt to law enforcement. I know they have a difficult job and I know that I (though not all people) are likely made safer by their work. But this kind of report only reinforces the belief by so many today that the police and other security forces are not our friends, but too often abuse their power at the expense of those who have the most to lose.

We hear often today that “unions do not really represent the views of their membership.” In the case of The National Border Control Council, I can only hope that is true.

 

 

A Woman And Her Baby…

April 4, 2016

Part of the significance of the Feast of the Annunciation is lost this year as it is celebrated today. The usual date of commemoration is, of course, March 25 but that was Good Friday this year. Hardly an appropriate day to remember Luke’s account of the announcement to Mary by the angel Gabriel that she would “conceive and bear a son and call his name Jesus.” (Luke 1:31)!

The March 25 date was originally chosen, of course, because it is exactly nine months before the church’s celebration of Jesus’ birth on December 25 and, even though this feast often falls in the Lenten or Easter Seasons, it begins once again the annual cycle of Jesus’ conception, birth, life and death which will lead to his eventual resurrection.

This year the feast of the Annunciation was delayed even longer than usual because of the early date of Easter and the need to “transfer” the feast not only until after Holy Week, but until after the days of Easter Week which also take precedence.

Be all that as it may, this is an important feast day to remember. It sets Mary on her path toward being the mother of the Messiah. It symbolizes the cosmic nature of this birth and the fact that humanity and divinity would meet in a special way in the womb of this Jewish teenager. It even provides the first line of famous mantra-prayer, “Hail Mary,full of grace, the Lord is with you….” (Luke 1:28)

Whenever I keep this feast, I am reminded of words from one of my mentors, Dean Alan Jones, sometime Dean of Grace Cathedral, San Francisco. He highlighted three dominant images of our Christian faith — a woman (and her baby); a ruined man (on a cross); and a community of persons (the Holy Trinity). And then he said something like,

“Confronted with these images — a woman and her baby; a ruined man; and a community of persons — how then shall we live?” 

How then shall we live? How indeed! We must surely work to protect all women and their children. We must stand with the last and the least, the broken and the ruined of this world. And we must be part of that community of love which is an earthly expression of that community of love found in the Godhead itself, that community which Christians call Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. That is how we at least begin to live.

And it all started with a woman and her baby…

Prepare Yourself To Live!

April 3, 2016

What a wonderful way to continue the Easter celebration today: experiencing the Quad City Symphony, the Handel Oratorio Society and the Augustana College Choir perform Mahler’s Symphony No. 2 in C minor, “Resurrection.” It was extremely well done and especially meaningful to my wife, Susanne, who was privileged to be part of a choir offering this same superb music while a student at the University of Iowa, years ago.

The program notes point out that the symphony “begins with reflections on the afterlife (movement one), happy memories of the deceased (movement two), followed immediately by an ominous sense of meaninglessness (movement three). Then, a profound profession of faith in eternal life (movement four) leads to the final, apocalyptic vision: the Dies Irae, the last trumpet and the final resurrection of the dead (movement five).

The amazing thing about this piece is its ability to avoid the thin, optimistic, “pie-in-the-sky” vision of the resurrection and eternal life offered in too many Easter sermons and funeral homilies. The reality of death, confrontation with the possible meaningless of life, the real grief experienced in the death of a loved one are all present. Yet, in the every movement — from the grave, to pleasant memories, to near-despair, to the triumph of the resurrection — hope is an ever-present theme. Hope, not optimism.

This is our Easter message, dear friends:

Was enstanden ist, das muB vergehen! Was vergangen, auferstehen! Hor auf zu beben! Bereite dich zu leben!

What was created must perish, What has perished must rise again. Tremble no more! Prepare yourself to live!

 

 

The Scriptures And The Power Of God

April 2, 2016

We conclude this Easter Week with a flashback: Mark’s account of the Sadducees trying to “prove” Jesus wrong about his belief in resurrection (Mark 12:18-27). The temple-centered, conservative Sadducee-party in first century Judaism did not believe in resurrection or eternal life in any form. As such, they were opposed to the Pharisees who did and to whom Jesus was actually closer theologically, for all his criticism of them. (You always hurt the ones you love!)

Citing the Old Testament precept that a man should marry his deceased brother’s wife (or rather add her to his harem) in order to keep her from becoming destitute as a widow, the Sadducees set up a conundrum. Suppose this happens seven times in succession — seven brothers had fulfilled this obligation to one woman. So, Jesus, they scoff, “in the resurrection whose wife will she be?”

Jesus’ scathing response is, “Is not the reason you are wrong, that you know neither the scriptures nor the power of God?” Pretty devastating critique of these “high church” leaders! But his point is that they are trying to use human categories and earthly arrangements to describe a state of existence far beyond such comparisons.

“Not knowing the scriptures” would seem to indicate that, while the Sadducees may have been well versed in the niceties of laws and commandments and obligations, they had apparently failed to note that the Hebrew Bible has very little to say about what “life was like” in Sheol or even in the hoped-for resurrection.

“Not knowing the power of God” was to underestimate the dramatic transformation which will take place at the time of resurrection and that earth-oriented, time-bound human relationships like marriage would likely be gathered up into a brand new existence of love and community quite impossible for our minds to grasp on this side of the grave.

Jesus’ warning to the Sadducees might well be taken to heart today for those who wish to “define” what the resurrection will be like, when it will occur, and exactly who will be its beneficiaries. Better to acknowledge that none of us really “know” the scriptures or the power of God and that some things are best left in the realm of mystery.

Mystery to be contemplated in awe. Not explained from our limited perspective.

Why Seek The Living Among The Dead?

April 1, 2016

Continuing our daily lectionary readings for Easter Week, we reach today the resurrection story according to Luke’s Gospel. (Luke 24:1-12) In it, we have one of the most powerful lines delivered in all the accounts. Coming to the tomb at dawn to anoint Jesus’ body properly for burial “the women” encounter two men (not simply the one man, as in Mark, or the angel, as in Matthew, but two men “in dazzling clothes!”). Their question to the women is profound, “Why seek the living among the dead?”

Far from being appreciated for the noble “act of corporal mercy” they were about to perform out of love for Jesus and grief at his loss, the women are gently upbraided for not remembering Jesus’ constant teaching that not even death would remove him, or his influence, from among them.

So, Mary Magdalene, Joanna (not Salome, as in Mark, and Mary the mother of James, perhaps “the other Mary” in Matthew) rush to tell the apostles who refuse to believe it until Peter ran to the tomb, found only the linen cloths, and returned to “mansplain” things to his buddies.

The point is, all of them…and all of us…need to stop seeking the living among the dead. That’s what participants in the “emergent church” movement and perhaps even the new Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, Michael Curry, mean by “the Jesus Movement.” It means that we Christians need to stop defining ourselves primarily by our membership in one of the tens of thousands of denominations which make up the church today, and start defining ourselves as “followers of Jesus” and actually begin doing what he commanded us to do — love God, love our neighbors as ourselves; and actually begin putting that love into action. We will never find the living among the dead!

It means that literalistic readings of the Bible which try to have us wrap our 21st century minds around pre-Copernican, pre-Newtonian, pre-Darwinian, pre-Freudian concepts are doomed to failure. As John Dominic Crossan has said, “The problem is not that the biblical writers wrote literally and we are now smart enough to understand them symbolically, but that they wrote symbolically and we are now stupid enough to try and understand them literally.” We will never find the living among the dead!

One more example: for all you constitutional “originalists” who want to maintain that the Constitution is best understood as a “dead” document the words of which can only be interpreted as the founders would have understood them in their day, rather than seeing it as a living, breathing document which must constantly be interpreted for new challenges, some advice from Luke: Trust me, you will never find the living among the dead!

The point of Easter is that it is much more exciting and challenging it is to serve a risen Lord than a dead hero. Much more exciting and challenging to follow Jesus to Galilee and meet him there than continue to spend all our time taking care of his dead body.

Why seek the living among the dead?