Archive for the ‘Emergent Church’ Category

Maybe If We Just Shake Things Up, Things Will Get Better

April 27, 2016

“Maybe if we just shake things up, things will get better.” I heard a Trump supporter say that this morning in an interview on NPR. I think there a lot of “Trumpites” who feel that way. And, quite frankly, there are a lot of Bernie Sanders’ voters who would agree with that sentiment.

I can understand how, say, an unemployed or underemployed blue collar worker who just can’t seem to get ahead no matter how hard she or he works might come to that conclusion. And I can understand how a college student, or recent graduate, disillusioned by Barack Obama’s seeming inability to find common ground with Congress to move forward a progressive agenda on raising the minimum wage or reforming the immigration system or getting corporate money out of politics might feel the same way.

And so, “maybe if we just shake things up, things will get better.” Or not. Maybe if we shake things up, things will get worse.

What will happen when Donald Trump cuts taxes but, in order to strengthen what is already the finest and strongest military in the world, increases the Pentagon budget? A George W. Bush style recession, that’s what. What happens when the wall gets built (whether or not Mexico pays for it), when we resume or even increase the levels of torture used against detainees, when we renege on international trade deals and cut back on regulations designed to combat global warming? The United States will become the laughing-stock of the world…and especially of our allies, that’s what.

What will happen when Bernie Sanders tries, and fails, to get a single-payer health care system in this country? The gains made by so-called Obama care will be forfeited as a contentious debate about health care opens all over again, that’s what. What happens when college is deemed free, but the tax cuts on the upper, upper class proposed to pay for it, does not find sufficient votes to pass? A crisis in higher education, that’s what. And just how will those “big banks” get broken up, Bernie? We still haven’t heard.

I could go on and on, but these few examples may serve to illustrate my point. “Maybe if we just shake things up, things will get better?”

Or maybe they will get much, much…worse.

 

 

Remembering Mark

April 25, 2016

Lots to think about on this St. Mark’s Day (April 25): The last parish I loved and served before being elected Bishop of Iowa was St. Mark’s Church and School in Cocoa, Florida. Yesterday, I was honored to make an episcopal visitation to St. Mark’s Church in Glen Ellyn IL in the Diocese of Chicago where we had two baptisms, twenty-eight confirmations, and one reception. And, I am remembering writing my first book John Mark (still available on Amazon!).

The liner notes for what my publisher described as a “gospel novel,” read this way: “What would it be like if you could meet one of the authors of the New Testament? In his novel…Christopher Epting gives us that chance. His story is the first gospel ever written, the Gospel of Mark, but told through the eyes, the experiences, the vision of the person who wrote it.”

“In this beautifully narrated version of the life and ministry of Jesus we are invited into the story in an intimate and immediate way. We are given the rare opportunity to walk beside the figures of the Bible, not as icons from the distant past, but as real people, as people we have known and loved, as friends. John Mark is an extraordinary journey, shared by an extraordinary person, the first person ever to write the life of Jesus.”

This little book came to life as a kind of extended “Ignatian meditation” on the first gospel after my first trip to the Holy Land. It marinated in my mind and heart for years, was written over time, and put in final form only after my “first retirement” in 2010. I have always loved the fast-paced, urgent, almost outline account of Jesus’ life and tried to re-capture that by imagining myself as the supposed-author, John Mark. It was fun to write and, some say, fun to read.

Give it a try!

 

 

 

What Was Jesus’ Scariest Commandment?

April 23, 2016

I think in many ways Jesus gives us one of his scariest commandments on the Fifth Sunday of Easter! He says, “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another.  Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another.  By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” (John 13:34-35).

Well, you say, why should that be so scary? Sounds like a simple command to me – love one another.  Of course we should do that!  Yet, it may not be as simple as it sounds when first we hear it.  For one thing, Jesus does not simply say: “Love one another,” does he? He says, “Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another.”

And just how did Jesus love his disciples? Well, he left his home and family in order to prepare himself to give his entire energy and attention to teaching and forming those disciples into the kind of community which could carry on God’s mission when Jesus’ earthly work was done.

He spent three tough years traveling about Galilee and Judea, living on the generosity of strangers, putting himself in jeopardy time and time again by hanging around with people who were unacceptable to “polite society,” teaching a dangerous message about the kingdom of God and, in the process, alienating both the religious establishment and the political “powers that be” because they were so threatened by that message.

Jesus concluded that public ministry by marching into the teeth of the opposition in the holy city of Jerusalem, fully aware that there was a plot against his life and that such public preaching would likely lead to his arrest, “trial”, and execution. And that those twelve disciples he had so carefully and lovingly nurtured would probably cave in and desert him when the going got rough, leaving him a spectacle of failure in the eyes of most people.

That’s how much Jesus loved his disciples! Enough to give himself totally to them, make their education and formation his highest priority, model the kind of life he expected them to live no matter how dangerous that was, and ultimately forgive them for betraying him and running away after all he had done for them!  And that is the kind of love Jesus commands us to have for one another! That’s the kind of love we are to have for one another right here at St. Mark’s Episcopal Church!

But it gets worse than that! For Jesus goes on to say: “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another!” In other words, it was not because of their brilliant teaching or miraculous healings that people would know that they were Jesus’ disciples. It was not because of their piety or even their holiness that people would know that they were Jesus’ disciples. It was to be because of how they loved each other that people would know.

I think that must have been in Peter’s mind in today’s reading from the Acts of the Apostles as he wrestles with whether God could possibly accept these filthy, unclean Gentles also as disciples of Jesus Christ!  All Peter’s life he had been taught that these people were sinners, that they were so unclean that he would be putting himself in jeopardy just by eating with them…or even by eating the same kind of food that they ate! Now, he has become convinced that God is saying ‘not to make a distinction between them and us…and that “what God has made clean” he was not to call profane! (Acts 11: 12, 9)

 

In other words, he was being asked to love people he never thought he could love because it was only by doing so that they, and people around them, would know that he was a disciple of Jesus! He was beginning to learn that, while John the Baptist, had baptized with water, he and these Gentiles were baptized with the Holy Spirit – with God’s Spirit…with the Spirit of love!

Well, this morning we will be confirming and receiving into The Episcopal Church! And that means that we are going to be praying for the strengthening in their lives of that same Holy Spirit…with God’s Spirit…with the Spirit of love.

And you, members of their families and members of this parish, are going to promise that you will “do all in your power to support these persons in their life in Christ.” You’re going to promise to pray and to be the kind of witnesses which will help these people grow into the full stature of Christ…and that you are going to support them in their Christian life.

Do you know that that’s going to require of you?  It’s going to require that you make the kind of sacrifices for them and for St. Mark’s, Glen Ellyn that Jesus made for his disciples! You’re going to have to be willing to work and pray and give so that St. Mark’s Church will be around for years and decades to come to nurture these folks in their Christian faith and life.

You’re going to have to build up this community by meeting in small groups and loving one another – through thick and thin, whether you agree with one another or not (frankly, whether you even like one another or not!) – with the kind of love Jesus had for his disciples. Because it is only when people see that kind of love that they will know that you are Jesus’ disciples, and will be drawn to join you here!

Because ultimately, it will not be because of our beautiful liturgy (as much as we love it) that people will know we are Jesus’ disciples. It will not be because of our fine music program (as beautiful as it is!) that people will know we are Jesus’ disciples. It will not be because of eloquent words from this pulpit that people will know we are Jesus’ disciples.

“By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, “Jesus said, “If…you have love for one another!”

What kind of love? Sacrificial, risking, patient, forgiving love – for one another. “Just as I have loved you, “Jesus said, “You also should love one another.”

Remember that, beloved, if you want this church to grow…and to be around…and to make a difference! Love one another. As he loves you!

Good Night, Sweet Prince

April 22, 2016

I did not understand Prince. Not too surprising for an old guy whose musical tastes alternate between the Beatles, Jazz, New Country, and Classical! I found his songs — like so many these days — unintelligible unless you had “liner notes” (now there’s a thing of the past!) and his videos off-putting at best.

Having said that, he was obviously a musical genius of sorts, a prolific composer, incredibly versatile and an accomplished instrumentalist. The outpouring of praise and sadness at his passing is testimony to the fact that what I did not “get,” countless others did. I mourn his sudden and early death, and I hope (though I’m not optimistic) that it was from so-called natural causes.

I struggle with his profession to be a person of faith while marketing (very shrewdly) material that can only be described as salacious. Perhaps, as some have suggested, he came to faith later in life. Fair enough. Many have. Although I do not recall hearing him apologize or be the least bit regretful of some of his earlier work. Perhaps no apology is necessary.

What is interesting to me is his being described as one who sought to hold together the dualities of his life into one. Black and white, straight and gay, blues to psychedelia and everything in between. That is surely something to be celebrated. We have enough divisions and bipolar thinking in this country. Throwing a monkey wrench into some of that would be an accomplishment in and of itself.

His clear holding in tension of sexuality and spirituality (sometimes in the same song) is an important thing to note. Wiser sages than I (or Prince) have often pointed out the relationship of sexuality and spirituality. Both seek a kind of unitive experience, both (at their best) are motivated by love, both are among the most powerful forces which can move human beings. And both are mysteries.

If Prince’s work allows us to wrestle, once again, with the ancient connections between spirituality and sexuality, that will be a good thing. Listening again to his body of work may do this. Discovering “new” material of which there is said to be vaults-full may be another.

And it really won’t matter whether this old guy “gets it” or not. It will nonetheless be part of the legacy of one who left us far too soon.

 

What Should Bernie Do Now?

April 20, 2016

As expected both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump notched Yyuuugge wins in the New York primary last night. They were both (even the Donald) fairly gracious in their victory speeches with Trump mainly thanking his staff and the voters, Clinton reminding her audience that she and Bernie Sanders have a lot more in common than in difference. Mr. Trump is obviously beginning to listen to his newly-hired handlers in trying to become more presidential. And Sec. Clinton is starting the task of trying to unite the Democratic Party after a couple of contentious weeks on the campaign trail between Sanders and her.

Some postulate that these victories in New York place the two front runners on a pretty easy glide path to victory, perhaps even avoiding a contentious open convention on the Republican side. I think it’s a bit early to predict that, but as Hillary said, “Victory is in sight” at least for her. If that is so, what should Bernie do now?

I agree with those who say that he should absolutely NOT get out of the race (not that there’s much chance of that!). His “movement message” is compelling, exactly what this country needs to hear, and has motivated hordes of younger voters wooed by his idealism and his integrity. Bernie Sanders has been, and will continue to be, a real asset for the Democrats and the nation in general.

I do think he needs to moderate his tone a bit now. Or rather, return to the issue-oriented, non-personal style he began this race with. Advisers who counseled him to “take Hillary on” about Wall Street speeches and shenanigans with the Democratic National Committee were wrong. His appeal is his message and his ability to rise above the petty personal attacks such as we see on the GOP side. He should regain that perspective for the duration of the campaign.

Not only is this the moral and ethical thing for him to do as the most moral and ethical candidate on the trail, but it is smart politics. No matter who wins the nomination, the Democratic Party will need to unite to defeat Donald Trump (who I do not believe will be as soundly defeated as many of the pundits predict — there are a lot of angry people out there). Working now to begin to forge that Democratic unity will guarantee Senator Sanders a large place at the Convention, a speaking role in that gathering, and — most importantly — the ability to influence the platform in a more progressive direction.

Maybe even a Cabinet position. Health, Education, and Welfare?

Heart With Bernie, Head With Hillary

April 19, 2016

As this Tuesday of the New York presidential primary dawns, I continue to be conflicted in my support of the Democratic candidates. The fact that “my heart’s with Bernie, but my head’s with Hillary” is demonstrated by the fact that I continue to support him with a monthly donation (more than his average $27 supporters, but fully aligning with them) while not giving her a cent (because she doesn’t need it) even though I was a delegate for her at our Democratic District Convention here in eastern Iowa.

As a catholic Christian (though not a Roman Catholic one) how could I not love a politician who, according to the National Catholic Reporter, has “embraced decades of Catholic social teaching in a brief visit to the Vatican Friday, lambasting some particularly American aspects of the global market system in a bid to match his voice to Pope Francis’ cry against the ‘new idols’ of money and wealth.”

How could one who has preached and taught and tried to live such social teachings for over four decades not agree with Bernie Sanders when he said, “I am told time and time again by the rich and powerful, and the mainstream media that represent them, that we should be ‘practical’, that we should accept the status quo; that a truly moral economy is beyond our reach”

“Yet Pope Francis himself is surely the world’s greatest demonstration against such a surrender to despair and cynicism,” Sanders continued, “He has opened the eyes of the world once again to the claims of mercy, justice and the possibilities of a better world. He is inspiring the world to find a new global consensus for our common home.”

Wow, preach it, Bernie!

While I continue to believe that Hillary Clinton, should she be elected, is more likely to be able to lead in taking incremental steps toward some of these same goals, I am mightily impressed by Senator Sanders’ integrity and decades-long consistency in his advocacy of economic justice and equality for all. I have said before that I will support him enthusiastically should he win the nomination.

But, as the Supreme Court seems poised to overturn Barack Obama’s signature accomplishment on immigration and as the Congress continues to block any and all progressive moves by the Administration, my fear is that four years of Bernie Sanders will, once again, lead to more gridlock and disillusionment as a Republican legislature will unite in trying to sabotage anything such a liberal President will try to accomplish.

Then again, those same “Hillary haters” may well frustrate her attempts to work across the aisle just as they have President Obama’s. The only real hope is for the Democratic nominee to bring along, on his or her coat-tails, more “down the line” candidates for the Senate and House, actually pulling off the “political revolution” Sanders is calling for. I wish Bernie was working as hard at this as Hillary is (the real purpose of those embarrassing George Clooney fund raisers!)

It’s a quandary.

But I am proud to support a political party which has put forth two candidates — a democratic socialist and a woman with a long history of working for women’s rights and children’s issues along with vast experience in international relations. It goes without saying that either one of these dedicated public servants will serve us better than any of the clowns on the GOP side.

The Mediterranean Sea Should Not Be A Tomb

April 18, 2016

Yesterday I mentioned that the press had generally given short shrift to Pope Francis’ companion on the visit to the Greek island of Lesbos to give comfort and visibility to the many refugees temporarily housed there. This “companion” was Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, the spiritual leader of the world’s Eastern Orthodox Christians.

This loosely associated, though theologically connected communion is the second largest Christian family in the world, with the Roman Catholic Church as the largest, Anglicans third in number and Lutherans bringing up a close fourth. Like the Anglicans and Lutherans, but unlike the Roman Catholics, Orthodox churches are autonomous in polity with Bartholomew representing a spiritual, rather than juridical, primacy. Even this is sometimes challenged by the Russian Orthodox Church.

Be all that as it may, Bartholomew is a formidable figure who has made something of a reputation for himself as the “Green Patriarch” due to his passion for the environment and environmental stewardship. I once heard him give a lecture in Cuba (with Fidel Castro in the same audience) when visiting there with the National Council of Churches for the opening of the first Greek Orthodox Church in Havana. He was brilliant!

Last week, Bartholomew was even more blunt in his public remarks about the refugee crisis than Pope Frances. Speaking at the migrants’ camp he said, “The world will be judged by the way it has treated you. And we will all be accountable for the way we respond to the crisis and conflict in the regions that you come from. The Mediterranean Sea should not be a tomb.”

Perhaps emboldened by the Patriarch’s words, Archbishop Ieronymos II, leader of the local Greek church added, “I hope that we never see children washing up on the shores of the Aegean Sea. I hope to soon see them there, untroubled, enjoying life.”

This was — for all its brevity — one of the Christian church’s finest hours in recent memory. For all those, in this country and around the world, who claim the name “Christian” and yet seem to stand for exclusion, fear, and xenophobia, perhaps we could invite them to look at these recent statements as examples of what true “religious values” in today’s world are all about.

This Guy Is The Real Deal!

April 17, 2016

It’s hard to overstate the symbolic significance of events surrounding Pope Francis’ recent trip to a refugee camp on the Greek island of Lesbos last week. First of all, the media-savvy pontiff was well aware that his very visit would shed the light of the world’s press on the faces of these victims of the greatest human tragedy in our current time.

Secondly, of course, he not only  visited the refugee community he “walked his talk” by flying twelve Syrian refugees back to Rome. Even he admitted that this was but “a drop of water in the sea” of Europe’s migration crisis, but if every Christian community in the world would follow his model, there would be no refugee crisis anywhere in the world.

Related items got little attention: He made this visit with the Ecumenical Patriarch, Bartholomew, representing the Orthodox churches. This great man, often known as the “Green Patriarch” because of his strong environmental stands, was sadly neglected by most press reports and yet is the titular head of the second largest Christian communion in the world just as Francis is the actual leader of the largest. This ecumenical gesture is the latest in a movement toward healing the split between East and West in the Christian world which has existed for more than a thousand years.

Ecumenism extended to inter-religious awareness as the twelve Syrian refugees (members of three families) turned out to be Muslims, not Christians. This sends a clear message to the world about the need better to integrate Muslims into Western society because, Francis said, “Their privilege is that they are children of God.” In other words, human beings.

The Roman Catholic community of Sant’Egidio will actually welcome these refugees into their headquarters in Rome’s Trastevere neighborhood. I have worshiped, broken bread, and traveled with this amazing, primarily lay-led charitable community which has quietly led to instances reconciliation around the world and daily feeds and shelters members of the “Roma” (or gypsy) community in the city of Rome. They, like the Bishop of Rome, are examples of Christianity at its finest, putting flesh around the spirit of love demonstrated by the religion’s Founder.

Finally, just before his departure, the Pope met briefly with U.S. presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. Some have decried this as an openly political move by Sanders even while Pope Francis described it as “good manners and nothing more.” Actually, it was both. Sanders genuinely admires Francis’ “democratic socialism” (otherwise known as Catholic social teaching) and is married to a Roman Catholic.

But he could not have been unaware how this would have played with desired Catholic voters in New York who will be voting in the primary this Tuesday. Nor could Francis — again, extremely politically and socially aware — have failed to know what kind of signal he was sending about his admiration for (and support of?) Senator Sanders.

I just think this brief trip was an amazing and extremely effective gesture which reveals with startling clarity how the twin poles of “the Jesus Movement” (evangelism and reconciliation) so often spoken of by our own Presiding Bishop Michael Curry can come together seamlessly.

In the words of one young Facebook commentator on Pope Francis’ recent trip: “This guy is the real deal!”

Thoughts On “Amoris Laetitia”

April 9, 2016

I used to respect greatly  the Roman Catholic Church for having very high moral standards but — through the confessional and the care of pastors — being quite compassionate, forgiving and understanding to those of us (all of us!) who cannot live up to those standards. This seems to be the approach of Pope Francis in the new apostolic exhortation: “Amoris Laetitia;” The Joy of Love.

So, divorced persons married contrary to the discipline of the church may perhaps now be admitted to holy communion on a case-by-case basis, more on the discretion of local bishops and parish priests than annulment proceedings from the Vatican half a world away. This may, in fact, be the most important and most progressive proclamation in the document. But, while people who happen to be gay and others living in “irregular situations” may now be formally “welcomed” by the local church, will they really feel that way?

Cardinal Christoph Schonborn of Austria calls this “a classic example of the organic development of doctrine.” But is it really? It seems to me to be a restatement of traditional doctrine albeit wrapped in more compassionate and merciful language (which, of course, is surely to be applauded). But the question remains: does doctrine actually develop or  is it unchanging, merely to be expressed in different ways for each generation.

For example: while it made perfect sense for Jesus to outlaw divorce in a society where divorced women would be forced into the streets, destitute or even worse, does it make sense today? And, while it made perfect sense for Jesus to choose only male apostles in the patriarchal culture in which he lived, does it make sense today? And finally, while it made sense for Paul to be horrified at homosexuality when it was thought to be a “choice” engaged in by heterosexual pagans because of their unbridled lust, does it make sense today when the science of homosexuality and the example of so many faithful gay couples are before us?

I believe the answer to those questions is “No.” I have the utmost respect for the Bishop of Rome and the church he serves. But I believe that they — and other Christian communions including my own — have much more work to do in understanding how church doctrine can and does indeed develop, how it always has, and how the church can best minister to and with all people today, holding on to the principles of love and compassion Jesus taught, but living them out in different ways in the very different societies in which we live.

For Gay, Ian, and Rosalie

April 8, 2016

Words of encouragement from this evening’s Lesson for Evening Prayer (I Peter 3:13-4:6) for the three courageous Episcopal Church’s representatives on the Anglican  Consultative Council:

“Do not fear what they fear, and do not be intimidated, but in your hearts sanctify Christ as Lord. Always be ready to make your defense to anyone who demands from you an accounting of the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and reverence.”

“Keep your conscience clear, so that, when you are maligned, those who abuse you for your good conduct in Christ may be put to shame. For it is better to suffer for doing good, if suffering should be God’s will, than to suffer for doing evil.”

Stay strong, my sisters and brothers!