Archive for the ‘Emergent Church’ Category

Intentional Discipleship in the Anglican Communion

April 6, 2016

Just finished reading “Intentional Discipleship and Disciple-Making: An Anglican Guide for Christian Life and Formation.” This is required reading for the Anglican Consultative Council members who will be meeting next week in Africa. The editors of the various articles contained in the 117 page volume are The Rev. Canon John Kafwanka and The Rev. Canon Mark Oxbrow. Forward and Preface by The Most Rev. Ng Moon Hing, Primate of the Church of the Province of South East Asia and The Archbishop of Canterbury, respectively. Those names alone will give a hint as to its perspective and content.

The first eight chapters deal with discipleship viewed through the following lenses: Biblical Theology, discipleship in the early church, Roman Catholic theology, discipleship in the Orthodox tradition, Anglican formation, the Five Marks of Mission, healing and discipleship, and the role of the “instruments of the Anglican Communion.”

The final nine chapters deal with case studies from Africa, Asia, Europe, The Americas; children and youth; Bible and sacraments; discipleship resources, mission and development agencies ; and, finally,”making the case for intentional discipleship in the Communion. The content of the volume is quite mixed from my perspective, but probably accurately reflects the varying contexts around the Anglican world.

A fairly balanced critique predictably finds North America and Europe suffering from a kind of “spiritual malaise” and living in a post-Christendom environment but Africa, Asia and the “developing world” also face some criticism for relying on vast numbers alone without following up with adequate Christian formation and training for discipleship. Witness the corruption in some Provinces and the tragedy in Rwanda to see extreme examples of this.

The little book is well worth the read. For surely, regardless of our cultural perspective, all can agree that we need to do a better job of turning “followers” into “disciples” and “disciples” into “apostles.” A focus on resources which emphasize Bible study, sacramental worship, small groups, and mission outside the doors of the church cannot be all bad.

 

 

 

“Politicized Cop-Talk?”

April 5, 2016

So, the National Border Patrol Council has endorsed Donald Trump for President! According to the New York Times today the Council said, “There is no greater physical or economic threat today than our open borders…” Really?

Yet today, the editorial continues: “…the border is more militarized than ever, and arrests there are at historic lows. Illegal immigration has been falling for years. More Mexicans are leaving the country than entering. President Obama, far from abandoning immigration enforcement, has deported more people — more than two million — more quickly than his predecessors.”

While, as a Democrat (and a Christian) I take no pride in that last statistic, it at least puts the lie to the claim that this President is turning a blind eye to illegal immigration and that “rapists and drug smugglers” are pouring across our southern border. That is simply not true. And, one would think, members of the Border Patrol, of all people, would know that.

Instead, they are choosing to support an ignorant demagogue with racist views and and a cynical strategy to win power for himself by playing on the fears and worst instincts of the American electorate. The council’s podcast “The Green Line” apparently majors in this kind of anti-Obama rhetoric. This sickens me, especially when sponsored by a union is made up entirely of members paid by my tax dollars.

I try to give the benefit of the doubt to law enforcement. I know they have a difficult job and I know that I (though not all people) are likely made safer by their work. But this kind of report only reinforces the belief by so many today that the police and other security forces are not our friends, but too often abuse their power at the expense of those who have the most to lose.

We hear often today that “unions do not really represent the views of their membership.” In the case of The National Border Control Council, I can only hope that is true.

 

 

A Woman And Her Baby…

April 4, 2016

Part of the significance of the Feast of the Annunciation is lost this year as it is celebrated today. The usual date of commemoration is, of course, March 25 but that was Good Friday this year. Hardly an appropriate day to remember Luke’s account of the announcement to Mary by the angel Gabriel that she would “conceive and bear a son and call his name Jesus.” (Luke 1:31)!

The March 25 date was originally chosen, of course, because it is exactly nine months before the church’s celebration of Jesus’ birth on December 25 and, even though this feast often falls in the Lenten or Easter Seasons, it begins once again the annual cycle of Jesus’ conception, birth, life and death which will lead to his eventual resurrection.

This year the feast of the Annunciation was delayed even longer than usual because of the early date of Easter and the need to “transfer” the feast not only until after Holy Week, but until after the days of Easter Week which also take precedence.

Be all that as it may, this is an important feast day to remember. It sets Mary on her path toward being the mother of the Messiah. It symbolizes the cosmic nature of this birth and the fact that humanity and divinity would meet in a special way in the womb of this Jewish teenager. It even provides the first line of famous mantra-prayer, “Hail Mary,full of grace, the Lord is with you….” (Luke 1:28)

Whenever I keep this feast, I am reminded of words from one of my mentors, Dean Alan Jones, sometime Dean of Grace Cathedral, San Francisco. He highlighted three dominant images of our Christian faith — a woman (and her baby); a ruined man (on a cross); and a community of persons (the Holy Trinity). And then he said something like,

“Confronted with these images — a woman and her baby; a ruined man; and a community of persons — how then shall we live?” 

How then shall we live? How indeed! We must surely work to protect all women and their children. We must stand with the last and the least, the broken and the ruined of this world. And we must be part of that community of love which is an earthly expression of that community of love found in the Godhead itself, that community which Christians call Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. That is how we at least begin to live.

And it all started with a woman and her baby…

Prepare Yourself To Live!

April 3, 2016

What a wonderful way to continue the Easter celebration today: experiencing the Quad City Symphony, the Handel Oratorio Society and the Augustana College Choir perform Mahler’s Symphony No. 2 in C minor, “Resurrection.” It was extremely well done and especially meaningful to my wife, Susanne, who was privileged to be part of a choir offering this same superb music while a student at the University of Iowa, years ago.

The program notes point out that the symphony “begins with reflections on the afterlife (movement one), happy memories of the deceased (movement two), followed immediately by an ominous sense of meaninglessness (movement three). Then, a profound profession of faith in eternal life (movement four) leads to the final, apocalyptic vision: the Dies Irae, the last trumpet and the final resurrection of the dead (movement five).

The amazing thing about this piece is its ability to avoid the thin, optimistic, “pie-in-the-sky” vision of the resurrection and eternal life offered in too many Easter sermons and funeral homilies. The reality of death, confrontation with the possible meaningless of life, the real grief experienced in the death of a loved one are all present. Yet, in the every movement — from the grave, to pleasant memories, to near-despair, to the triumph of the resurrection — hope is an ever-present theme. Hope, not optimism.

This is our Easter message, dear friends:

Was enstanden ist, das muB vergehen! Was vergangen, auferstehen! Hor auf zu beben! Bereite dich zu leben!

What was created must perish, What has perished must rise again. Tremble no more! Prepare yourself to live!

 

 

The Scriptures And The Power Of God

April 2, 2016

We conclude this Easter Week with a flashback: Mark’s account of the Sadducees trying to “prove” Jesus wrong about his belief in resurrection (Mark 12:18-27). The temple-centered, conservative Sadducee-party in first century Judaism did not believe in resurrection or eternal life in any form. As such, they were opposed to the Pharisees who did and to whom Jesus was actually closer theologically, for all his criticism of them. (You always hurt the ones you love!)

Citing the Old Testament precept that a man should marry his deceased brother’s wife (or rather add her to his harem) in order to keep her from becoming destitute as a widow, the Sadducees set up a conundrum. Suppose this happens seven times in succession — seven brothers had fulfilled this obligation to one woman. So, Jesus, they scoff, “in the resurrection whose wife will she be?”

Jesus’ scathing response is, “Is not the reason you are wrong, that you know neither the scriptures nor the power of God?” Pretty devastating critique of these “high church” leaders! But his point is that they are trying to use human categories and earthly arrangements to describe a state of existence far beyond such comparisons.

“Not knowing the scriptures” would seem to indicate that, while the Sadducees may have been well versed in the niceties of laws and commandments and obligations, they had apparently failed to note that the Hebrew Bible has very little to say about what “life was like” in Sheol or even in the hoped-for resurrection.

“Not knowing the power of God” was to underestimate the dramatic transformation which will take place at the time of resurrection and that earth-oriented, time-bound human relationships like marriage would likely be gathered up into a brand new existence of love and community quite impossible for our minds to grasp on this side of the grave.

Jesus’ warning to the Sadducees might well be taken to heart today for those who wish to “define” what the resurrection will be like, when it will occur, and exactly who will be its beneficiaries. Better to acknowledge that none of us really “know” the scriptures or the power of God and that some things are best left in the realm of mystery.

Mystery to be contemplated in awe. Not explained from our limited perspective.

Why Seek The Living Among The Dead?

April 1, 2016

Continuing our daily lectionary readings for Easter Week, we reach today the resurrection story according to Luke’s Gospel. (Luke 24:1-12) In it, we have one of the most powerful lines delivered in all the accounts. Coming to the tomb at dawn to anoint Jesus’ body properly for burial “the women” encounter two men (not simply the one man, as in Mark, or the angel, as in Matthew, but two men “in dazzling clothes!”). Their question to the women is profound, “Why seek the living among the dead?”

Far from being appreciated for the noble “act of corporal mercy” they were about to perform out of love for Jesus and grief at his loss, the women are gently upbraided for not remembering Jesus’ constant teaching that not even death would remove him, or his influence, from among them.

So, Mary Magdalene, Joanna (not Salome, as in Mark, and Mary the mother of James, perhaps “the other Mary” in Matthew) rush to tell the apostles who refuse to believe it until Peter ran to the tomb, found only the linen cloths, and returned to “mansplain” things to his buddies.

The point is, all of them…and all of us…need to stop seeking the living among the dead. That’s what participants in the “emergent church” movement and perhaps even the new Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, Michael Curry, mean by “the Jesus Movement.” It means that we Christians need to stop defining ourselves primarily by our membership in one of the tens of thousands of denominations which make up the church today, and start defining ourselves as “followers of Jesus” and actually begin doing what he commanded us to do — love God, love our neighbors as ourselves; and actually begin putting that love into action. We will never find the living among the dead!

It means that literalistic readings of the Bible which try to have us wrap our 21st century minds around pre-Copernican, pre-Newtonian, pre-Darwinian, pre-Freudian concepts are doomed to failure. As John Dominic Crossan has said, “The problem is not that the biblical writers wrote literally and we are now smart enough to understand them symbolically, but that they wrote symbolically and we are now stupid enough to try and understand them literally.” We will never find the living among the dead!

One more example: for all you constitutional “originalists” who want to maintain that the Constitution is best understood as a “dead” document the words of which can only be interpreted as the founders would have understood them in their day, rather than seeing it as a living, breathing document which must constantly be interpreted for new challenges, some advice from Luke: Trust me, you will never find the living among the dead!

The point of Easter is that it is much more exciting and challenging it is to serve a risen Lord than a dead hero. Much more exciting and challenging to follow Jesus to Galilee and meet him there than continue to spend all our time taking care of his dead body.

Why seek the living among the dead?

 

Easter’s Great Commission

March 31, 2016

In today’s Gospel reading for Easter Thursday, we have the account of the famous “Great Commission.” (Matthew 28:16-20) Having returned to where it all began, their native Galilee, the eleven remaining disciples experience Jesus as alive, not dead, as a continuing presence among them, not as a failed messiah. According to the text, they are torn between faith in this experience and continuing doubt that it could actually be true.

But their final “takeaway” from a mountain-top encounter with the risen Christ was that they now knew that he spoke with the authority of God and that their mission (should they choose to accept it!) would be to:

“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations.”  So, far from returning to their familiar work as fishermen, they are to become “apostles” (those who are sent) rather than simply “disciples” (those who learn). But they are sent to recruit more disciples of Jesus. How?

By “baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” They are to initiate new followers in the same way Jesus had inaugurated his own ministry (the baptism of John), in the same way they themselves (presumably) had been initiated, and in the same way as they certainly initiated others during Jesus’ public ministry — by baptism.

But this baptism is not merely the baptism of John. It now presumes incorporation into the life of God, the love of Jesus, and the indwelling presence of the Divine Spirit to guide them. It will become known as “Christian” Baptism, Holy Baptism.

What should the apostles teach these newly baptized ones? “To obey everything I have commanded you.” To be a disciple of Jesus means to learn what it means to live a life of absolute commitment to God, a life of solidarity with all people ( particularly the poor and powerless), a life of healing and forgiveness, and a life of non-violent, peaceful resistance to anything that seeks to destroy the dignity of human beings.

Is this even possible? they must have asked. Yes, but only because they are to “remember I am with you always, to the end of the age.” Because, in the final analysis, the importance of the resurrection is not about empty tombs or dramatic appearances in rooms with locked doors.

The importance of the resurrection is that Jesus is not an historical figure the likes of Moses or Alexander the Great or Cicero or Abraham Lincoln. They lived, made their contributions, and died.

Jesus lived, made his contribution, and died too. But “the death that he died, he died to sin, once for all. But the life he lives, he lives to God.” (Romans 6:10)

That IS the resurrection!

 

Keeping The Feast

March 30, 2016

As we seek to sustain our Easter joy throughout this week (and in fact, throughout the Great Fifty Days of Easter until the Day of Pentecost) this is our prayer for this morning: “O God, whose blessed Son made himself known to his disciples in the breaking of bread: Open the eyes of our faith, that we may behold him in all his redeeming work; who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever.” Amen.

This Collect reminds us that one of the ways the Risen Christ was made known to his disciples, and continues to be made known to us, is through the Eucharist. Table fellowship was a big part of Jesus’ common life with his disciples. He shared bread with outcast and sinner and with scribe and Pharisee during his earthly life. The common meal reached its zenith in that Last Supper (likely a Passover meal) when he identified the broken bread with his body and the poured out wine with his blood. He then told them to “do this in remembrance of me.”

No doubt they followed that command faithfully. Because Paul speaks of the Eucharist in great detail in his letters to the Corinthians and elsewhere. Luke tells of the Walk to Emmaus where Cleopas and his companion (his wife?) experience the Risen Christ and are quoted as saying, “Were not our hearts burning within us on the road when he was opening the scriptures to us?” (Luke 24:32) Yes, but not before they had shared a meal with him where he “took, blessed, broke, and gave them bread” to them…just as he had with the Twelve in the upper room the night before he died.

And, of course, seven of the apostles in the Gospel of John have bread and fish with Jesus on the beach in Galilee right after they had gone back to do what they knew best — fishing — as they wrestled with the possibility that all this had been for naught and that his mission (and theirs) was a failure. Once again, he was known to them in the “breaking of the bread.”

There are, of course, all kinds of theories about what “happens” at the Eucharist. Some of those theories have tragically become “church dividing” over the centuries. How that must grieve the heart of God! Perhaps we “understand it best” when we approach the Eucharist guided by these words attributed to Thomas Aquinas and later paraphrased by Elizabeth I.

“Taste and touch and vision to discern thee fail; faith that comes by hearing,  pierces through the veil. I believe whate’er the Son of God hath told; what the Truth has spoken, that for truth I hold.” (Hymnal 1979 #314)

Alleluia. Christ is Risen. Therefore, let us keep the feast!

 

Why Does Mark Seem To Have Two Endings?

March 29, 2016

I’ve always loved the Gospel of Mark — which is why I published an extended meditation on this first-gospel-ever-written called John Mark (see redmoonpublications.com). I love its fast-paced, almost breathless action and the fact that scholars believe it was written closest to the actual events it purports to convey. This Easter Week, in our daily lectionary, we have just completed various “endings” of Mark.

In keeping with its “highlights only, almost outline” webelieve that the original  ending of the gospel was at Mark 16:8 with Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome experiencing the empty tomb when they brought spices to anoint Jesus’ body. A young man suggests that they go tell Peter and the other disciples that he had been raised from the dead and that they should go back to the place where it all began — Galilee — where they would see him once again. Initially, however, the women fled from the tomb and didn’t tell anyone “for they were afraid.” The story ends with an affirmation of the resurrection, but no actual appearances of Jesus.

The longer ending of Mark (Chapter 16, verses 9-20) appear to have been added later and include details which would later be included in the Gospels of Matthew,  Luke-Acts (and perhaps even the much later Gospel of John!). The appearance to Mary Magdalene (John 20:11-18), walk to Emmaus (Luke 24:13-35) and Great Commission (Matthew 28:16-20) seem to be suggested in this longer ending of Mark.

The unknown author may have even known of Luke’s second-volume Acts of the Apostles since, in this section (Mark 16:17-18) he seems to refer to events such as exorcism by the apostles, speaking in tongues, and Paul’s snake handling which we only know of in the accounts of the Acts of the Apostles. Finally, the ascension of Jesus is mentioned (Mark 16:19-20) a fuller account of which we can find in Luke 24 and Acts 1.

Some people find the literary dependence between the four gospels (and even Acts) to be problematic since it suggests, among other things, that Matthew and Luke (and perhaps even John) had the Gospel of Mark before them when they wrote, incorporating much of his story and adding details of which they were aware or further grounding the life of Jesus in the Hebrew Scriptures.

I find it fascinating and even affirming that the four evangelists took such care in their recounting of Jesus’ life, death and resurrection while each one bringing an emphasis of his own — Matthew’s a Jewish one; Luke’s a Gentile one; John perhaps specifically Hellenistic thoughtand philosophy.

How much richer the accounts we have when seen though four sets of lenses than if we only had one, but that they took each other seriously enough to build on their predecessors’ work!

 

The White Robed Army Of Martyrs

March 28, 2016

“A suicide bomber killed at least 65 people, mostly women and children, at a park in Lahore on Sunday in an attack claimed by a Pakistani Taliban faction which said it had targeted Christians. More than 300 other people were wounded, officials said. The explosion occurred in the parking area of Gulshan-e-lqbal Park close to children’s swings.” (Reuters)

Close to children’s swings…

If ever we needed verification that there is sheer, naked, unimaginable evil in this world, perhaps that phrase will do it. Close to children’s swings. Some hate-filled, misguided murderer strapped explosives to his body and decided to move close to children playing on the quintessential child’s toy — a swing — before he blew himself…and their little bodies…to pieces.

Much has been made of the fact that this was Easter Sunday, and that the vast majority of people in the park were of the 2% minority population (Christians) in the park. But Muslims died too. People of no particular faith died too. Hatred and barbarism know no political, ethnic, or religious bounds. We see that in the senseless acts of random violence (multiplied many times by the plethora of guns in our society) right here in the United States.

Yet, this was not a random act of a madman. This was a coordinated, planned attack on a particular group of people held on a particular day, holy to them, and to much of the world. And so 65 more souls (and probably many more in the next days and weeks as more of the injured lose their battle for life) join the “great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, robed in white, with palm branches in their hands…” (Revelation 7:9)

For “the white robed army of martyrs” of the Te Deum continue to “praise you, O God.

Because, in the midst of it all, Christ is Risen, He is Risen indeed. Alleluia!