Archive for the ‘Emergent Church’ Category

Outranked

January 3, 2008

As we move through the Twelve Days of Christmas, it’s interesting to see that we are still running across the great figure of John the Baptist. The season of Advent makes much of John and the two middle Sundays are largely devoted to his role as the one who ‘prepares the way for the Lord.’

Now, as we work our way through the first chapter of the 4th Gospel – in fact, right after the elegant “Johannine Prologue” about the Word of God becoming flesh – here is John the Baptizer again! “The next day he saw Jesus coming toward him and declared, “Here is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” (John 1:29)

And, once again, John shows his humility in the presence of the Nazarene, “This is he of whom I said, ‘after me comes a man who ranks ahead of me because he was before me.’” Well, Jesus’ reputation certainly did not precede John’s own so it’s clear that this text means more than it first seems. How could Jesus have “come before” his elder cousin?

The language John uses for Jesus gives us the clue. “The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world”…the one who would be “revealed to Israel”…the Spirit descending and remaining upon him…and, finally, “I myself have seen and have testified that this is the Son of God.”

Clearly, in this text, John is identifying Jesus with the Anointed One, the Christ, the long-awaited Messiah. The phrase “Lamb of God” is reflective of Isaiah’s language about the Suffering Servant being like “a lamb led to the slaughter and like a sheep before its shearers is silent” (Isaiah 53:7)

The language about God’s Spirit descending and remaining on Jesus is reminiscent of all the “anointed ones,” all the kings of Israel and especially the great King David, whose literal and figurative successor the Messiah was expected to be.

 And, of course, long before the title “Son of God” took on the qualities of Incarnation and divinity and the Second Person of the Trinity, it simply was one more way for the people of Israel to describe their Messiah and King. (Later, in this same chapter Nathaniel says to Jesus, “Rabbi, you are the Son of God. You are the king of Israel!” John 1:49)

Faithful, prophetic, humble John. He prepared the way for Jesus, he baptized Jesus and, in a sense, “introduced him” to the world. He worked alongside Jesus, constantly pointing beyond himself to the One he believed to “outrank him.”

Finally, John was martyred by King Herod not only because of his own prophetic ministry, but because – no doubt – of his association with the One whose Kingship was never really intended to rival Herod’s, but which certainly called all the empires of this world into question, and continues to do so today!

As we move toward our conclusion of the celebration of this Messiah’s birth and launch once more into a new year, we could do worse than listen again to John the Baptist as he says, “Behold the Lamb of God; behold Him who takes away the sins of the world!”     

          

 

Mary

December 29, 2007
No, not that one. Although, as a child of a devout Roman Catholic family, she was undoubtedly named after the Mother of Jesus!
But this Mary is a School Sister of St. Francis and was my spiritual director for nearly twelve years, holding the light of Christ before me in good times and bad, through times of great loss and times of great rejoicing. Yesterday, I drove for three hours through a snow storm to have coffee with her, now in retirement and taking care of an elderly sister in the family home. 
We had set up the visit when I knew I would be home for the holidays, but didn’t anticipate the bad weather. No matter: a little time with this saint of God is worth more than a little inconvenience.
We commiserated about the brokenness in both our churches, recognizing as always that there is no “perfect church” but that we are called to remain firmly grounded where God has planted us and work for the renewal and unity that only God can bring. 
We spoke of the experience, common to both of us, of being driven ever-deeper into the primary relationship with God when the “props” of our institutions are taken away or are no longer up to the task. We spoke of the Beatitudes which she is studying anew…and the Lord’s Prayer which has become somehow new and fresh to both of us in recent years.
I admitted my surprising appreciation of Pope Benedict’s encyclicals and some of his writing and she agreed, having just finished reading his book on Jesus. “Very high Christology,” she observed, “but I’ve also enjoyed Marcus Borg — and his relatively low Christology. We’re still wrestling with the tension of Christ being both God and Man, aren’t we?”
And so it went. Personal stories, some theology, some talk about prayer and worship. And, as always, I came away refreshed and renewed. As with so many fine spiritual directors, it’s not so much what Mary says as who she is. I miss her.
But, we’ll stay in touch. We have to…       

Week of All (or at least some of the) Saints

December 27, 2007
I’ve often thought that the week after Christmas ought to be named “All Saints”   rather than November 1. Certainly this week we commemorate a number of major ones even though, in the post-Christmas Day slump, they often go uncelebrated. Yet, as always, each has something to teach us:
St. Stephen – How different the world would be if our response to personal attacks or wrongs done to us could be “Lord, do not hold this sin against them” (Acts 7:60b) as Stephen prayed before he died rather than, “May the Lord see and avenge” (2 Chronicles 24:22c) which was on the lips of Zechariah son of Jehoida when he faced a similar fate. And how often vengeance rather than forgiveness motivates our behavior.
St. John – How different the world would be if the Johannine ethic of a “new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another.” (John 13:34) was followed. Not just “love your neighbor as yourself,” but love as Jesus loved…with a willingness to lay down his life for his friends (and even his enemies!). To die for, rather than kill for, our beliefs.
Holy Innocents – How different the world would be if policy decisions were made with an eye toward how each one would affect our children rather than continue our Herodian policies of slaughter (Matthew 2:16) due to war, poverty,  lack of health care, and environmental degradation.  
Stephen, John, and all you little ones who “are no more” (Matthew 2:18) pray for us that we may do better in the coming New Year!

Emerging Church and The Bible

December 19, 2007
As I have written before, I try to keep an eye on the “emerging church” conversation these days. It’s an interesting phenomenon bringing together, as it does, “post evangelicals” and “post liberals” into what they hope is a fresh expression of the historic faith. It is a very loose confederation and really does prefer to call itself a “conversation” rather than a “movement.”
While some of the leaders in this effort have been roundly criticised for questioning certain “settled principles” of (particularly) evangelical doctrine, they do not seem to me to be dismissive of orthodox Christian theology as much as they are trying to articulate it for younger people so heavily influenced by the “post modern” age.
Their attempt to link faith and social justice is not new to Episcopalians nor is their attempt to reclaim and re-appropriate certain ancient liturgical practices (like chant and icons and the liturgy of the hours, etc.). What we can perhaps learn from them is a confidence in the narrative power of scripture.
So many of our clergy  trained — as I was — in the very “modern” methods of biblical and historical and literary critical approaches to interpreting scripture seem to have lost confidence, not only in scripture’s reliability but its very authority. I was spared that by being formed by Reginald Fuller and Fred Borsch and C.K. Barrett and C.H. Dodd and Raymond Brown and others.
I have never ceased to pray with and preach from the Bible even while utilizing what I hope are the best tools of literary criticism to try and determine what the text was saying in its original context. But the Bible is Holy Scripture — for me and for so many of these “emergent” leaders.
Our Catechism puts it this way: We call the Holy Scriptures “the Word of God because God inspired their human authors and because God still speaks to us through the Bible.” (Book of Common Prayer, page 853). We need to reclaim and rediscover that confidence and if the “emerging church” can help us do that, more power to them!    
  

The Archbishop’s Advent Letter

December 15, 2007

It seems a very wise thing for Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori to welcome, as she has done, the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Advent letter to the Primates’ suggesting, among other things, that he personally invite to the table representatives of The Episcopal Church and those who are most upset with some of its recent decisions. Far from imposing some kind of preconceived solutions or an extra-provincial council of some kind, this seems to be perfectly in line with the Archbishop of Canterbury’s role and may actually be helpful in the run-up to the Lambeth Conference next summer.

There were some very tough things said about The Episcopal Church in his letter. And one wonders why we continue to be singled out on the issue of the blessing of same sex unions when it is going on all around the Anglican Communion, and in other Christian communions, ‘under the radar screen.’ Nonetheless, there was also appreciation for the hard work done by The Episcopal Church, and its bishops, and a recognition that we have probably gone about as far as we can right now in seeking to clarify our position with respect to the Windsor Report and the Primates’ requests from Dar Es Salaam.

As always, with Rowan Williams’ writing, I shall want to take some time to parse it more deeply instead of making some kind of knee jerk response (of which there will be, I am sure, many!). He has rightly summarized our current difficulties as being every bit as much about the scripture and ecclesiology (especially the ministry of bishops) as about Christian ethics and the presenting issue of the place of gay and lesbian persons in the Church.

All topics we very much need to continue discussing — at the Lambeth Conference…and in our “advent preparation” for it.

Streams In The Desert

December 13, 2007

“When the poor and needy seek water, and there is none, and their tongue is parched with thirst, I the LORD will answer them, I the God of Israel will not forsake them.  I will open rivers on the bare heights, and fountains in the midst of the valleys; I will make the wilderness a pool of water, and the dry land springs of water…” (Isaiah 41:17-18)

In this Reading from Isaiah, the prophet is describing the power of the holy God of Israel and the assurance that God will come to their help, even while recognizing that Israel’s failures are many and very serious in God’s sight. The image he uses here is of streams in the wilderness and pools in the desert. This stretches right back, of course, to the roots of Israel’s history and all those times God provided water from the rock during the Exodus and provided drink for his people when their tongues were, quite literally, “parched with thirst.”

So, water is symbolic here, as it is so often throughout Scripture, for salvation – for rescue and for new life. But, in a land where water is always the issue, it had more than symbolic power. In today’s world over 1 billion people still lack access to safe water near their homes for drinking, cooking and washing. More than twice that many lack a safe and effective way to dispose of their bodies’ waste. And that’s why nearly 5,000 children in the developing world die every day from disease caused by unsafe water, sanitation, or hygiene.

My step son, Andrew, lives here in the city and has gotten involved in something called “WaterAid.” It’s based in London and is the world’s champion of safe water, effective sanitation, and hygiene promotion. WaterAid provides practical, sustainable solutions, made more effective through local and international collaborations and is involved in advocacy, education and poverty reduction in some of the world’s poorest countries

Drew works in management in the Border’s Book Store system, and has arranged a volunteer program for people to wrap Christmas gifts in several stores for free in exchange for a donation to WaterAid and an opportunity to share information with customers about the program. We’re really proud of him! And he can provide more information for anyone who might want to get involved!

Because water is surely a sign of salvation and new life… but it is also the actual conveyer of salvation and new life! Jesus says, of John the Baptist, in today’s Gospel: “See, I am sending my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way before you.” (Matthew 11: 10) In Advent, we remember that John was sent to prepare the way for the salvation Jesus brings. Perhaps programs like WaterAid and similar efforts to alleviate hunger and thirst around the world can provide a similar “John the Baptist” ministry.

Preparing the way for the Lord…and providing – quite literally – streams in the wilderness…pools in the desert!

       

                  

Actions…and Consequences…

December 7, 2007

While it is no secret that I support the full inclusion of faithful gay and lesbian Christians in the life of the Church, let there be no mistake about the costly nature of such decisions in the life of The Episcopal Church and beyond.

I write this post from Cairo, Egypt where I am attending the annual meeting of the Inter Anglican Standing Commission on Ecumenical and Interfaith Relations. This is a body which reports to the Anglican Consultative Council and monitors the activity and progress of the various Provinces of the Anglican Communion in matters ecumenical.

Since our General Convention decisions of 2003, these have been difficult meetings for The Episcopal Church’s representatives as well as our colleagues from the Anglican Church in Canada. Despite warm personal relations with our Church of England, Asian, African, South and West Indian colleagues, we are roundly criticised as Episcopalians for putting major stumbling blocks in the way of Anglican ecumenical relations.

Often cited are the writings of Bishop Spong, the confirmation of the Bishop of New Hamshire by General Convention 2003, and some bishops’ permission for the blessing of same sex unions in their dioceses despite the lack of an official liturgical rite in our church for such an event.

We were received by Pope Shenouda of the Coptic Orthodox Church here in Egypt one morning and subjected to nearly an hour of lecturing by His Holiness on the sins of the Anglican Communion and especially The Episcopal Church. This venerable monk and leader of his ancient church noted all the concerns I have mentioned above. He has actually read at least one of Bishop Spong’s books. And, is not impressed!

It would, of course, have been possible to take exception to much of Pope Shenouda’s hermeneutics, but “state occasions” like this are hardly the place for that. Particularly in a country where Christians are in the huge minority and undergo scrutiny and often severe criticism from their Muslim neighbors. We heard him out, acknowledged the difficulties we face, and asked for his prayers.

What would have been possible, however, had not the official dialogue with the Oriental Orthodox Churches been suspended over our actions, would have been to engage these issues together in a serious dialogue where our perspectives could be given a fair hearing rather than caricatured by the press or by voices from within our own church who wish the world to think that we are teaching some kind of “new faith.”

This is why I believe the Lambeth Conference must happen. No matter who is, or is not, invited and who chooses to come or not to come. Those of us who will be there must sit together, face to face, in the context of prayer, and both share and listen to one another deeply.

Only in this way can the wounds in our particular expression of the Body of Christ begin to be healed and a contribution perhaps made, by Anglicans, for healing the very Body of Christ of which we are a part.         

Advent Warning…Advent Hope

December 2, 2007

My wife and I love Advent above all the seasons of the  Church year. There is something about the chill in the air, the smell of greenery in the church, the great Advent hymns and lessons, and of course the approaching Christmas celebration which makes it all  so rich. Those  lessons from Scripture are filled with dire warnings, but also with hope.

Traditional interpretations of those passages would say that they are either literal or symbolic descriptions of “the end times” and warn us to “clean up our act” before impending judgment. Other scholars (even conservative ones like N.T. Wright) would hold that the prophets (and even Jesus) were warning of very real cataclysms which were about to occur — in Jesus’ case the likely destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans — if his people did not change their violent ways and follow him  toward a different kind of Kingdom.
Either way, it is clear that God cares about how individuals and nations conduct their affairs, that the future is even now rushing in upon our present, and that our actions have consequences — eternal ones. So, let us use this season of Advent, not only to prepare for the Christmas celebration, but to examine our lives and the life of our nation, in the light of this great Collect for Advent 1:

“Almighty God, give us grace to cast away the works of darkness, and put on the armor of light, now in the time of this mortal life in which your Son Jesus Christ came to visit us in great humility; that in the last day, when he shall come again in his glorious majesty to judge both the living and the dead, we may rise to the life immortal; through him who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, now and for ever.” Amen.

Faith and Works

November 28, 2007

 

Our Lessons today are perfect for the commemoration of the great 19th century monarchs  of Hawaii, King Kamehameha and Queen Emma. The First Reading from the Acts of the Apostles (17:22-31) shows us the gentle and sensitive evangelism preached by St. Paul to the Athenians where he builds on their primitive faith without undermining it. He acknowledges their altar to “an unknown god” and tells them that this is the God he has come to proclaim!

A similarly gracious approach must have been taken by the English missionaries (unlike some of the earlier ones in Hawaii!) who came at Kamehameha’s invitation and which led to the confirmation of both king and queen on this day in 1862.

They had already proven that they were people of good will and motivated by a Christ-like spirit by building Queen’s Hospital for their people in the wake of a devastating small pox epidemic. It only remained to introduce them to the Good News of the One who was the Source of such generosity!

And the great Gospel text from Matthew (25:31-40) reminds us that, while justification may indeed come by faith, Christ’s final Judgment will include seeing just how that faith has been lived out in our lives. “For I was hungry and you gave food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.”

I don’t know about you, but I can’t read that list without thinking of another one to which The Episcopal Church has committed itself through General Convention action – The Millenium Development Goals – eradicating extreme poverty and hunger, reducing child mortality, combating HIV/AIDS and malaria and other diseases and all the rest.

 I know that we have come under some criticism by adopting such “secular” goals and giving them such a high priority rather than, say, The Great Commission to “go into all the world, baptizing in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.” For the life of me, I can’t separate those things! I don’t think Jesus does either! Our Presiding Bishop has described the MDG’s as images…icons…lenses for how we can help build the reign of God in our own day.

“Show me your faith apart from your works,” St. James writes in his Epistle (2:18b), “And I by my works will show you my faith.” Queen Emma of Hawaii did that in spades!

After she lost her son and her husband to death, she devoted the rest of her life to good works and built schools and churches and took many other initiatives on behalf of the poor and the sick.

When was it, Lord, that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or in prison…and came to your help?

 

When you did it to one of the least of these, dear child, you did to me.

The Food and Wine of the Empire

November 26, 2007

 

I started reading the Book of Daniel today and found that there’s actually a great Commentary on it in the New Interpreter’s Bible series by a Quaker named Daniel Smith-Christopher. He says that Daniel is one of the most unusual, and one of the most dangerous, books in the Hebrew Bible!

Unusual because part of it is written in Hebrew and part of it in Greek and because the first half is collection of court stories, con-text stories and con-flict stories while the second half comprises the most important example of apocalyptic literature in the Old Testament. But the book is dangerous because it can contribute to social unrest, and even perhaps to revolution!

The book begins with what Smith-Christopher calls “the cuisine of resistance” (what a great phrase!) as Daniel refuses to eat “the king’s food and wine” and instead chooses to remain faithful to the dietary laws of his people. It’s an example of the kind of non-violent resistance many oppressed people have chosen to keep their dignity even in the midst of their captivity.

But it’s also a reminder that our faith often calls us to active non-conformity with the world. And perhaps we all need to ask ourselves what aspects of “the king’s food and wine” we Christians ought to resist for the sake of the Gospel. For the writer of Daniel, food was just a symbol of the resistance he thought we were called to show toward total domination and assimilation by the culture of the day!

Are we not also called to a life of resistance to the enticements of financial power and control over the destiny of other people? Are we not called to question the control powerful nations like our own exert over the developing world? What is the food and wine that the modern-day Empire is offering us?

So much of the advertising and marketing we have been seeing over these last days of “black Friday’ and the beginning the Christmas shopping season is geared toward changing our habits and convincing us that luxuries are really necessities that “we can’t live without!” And the tragic thing is that, so many times, those luxuries are disguised as necessities – things we need, rather than just things we want!

I wonder if this season is not the appropriate time for North American Christians like us to begin asking serious questions about our habits of consumption. Not only whether what we are buying is too much, but also whether it’s consumption that supports a living wage or a consumption that fosters a safe environment for workers.

John Woolman, that great itinerant preacher of the 18th century, refused to wear clothing that was either dyed or made by means of the slave trade. Perhaps we 21st century Christians need to think about no longer defiling ourselves with “the king’s food and wine.” And instead, like Daniel, begin standing with those exiled people the Empire continues to control!