Archive for the ‘Interfaith’ Category

“We Either Have A Country Or We Don’t”

February 18, 2016

“Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.” Edmund Burke’s familiar maxim  is nowhere more clearly seen than in the current Presidential primary season in the United States. I posted NPR’s Steve Inskeep’s New York Times article Donald Trump’s Secret? Channeling Andrew Jackson yesterday but I think it is so important that I’d like to say a few more things about it in this blog.

Many of us grew up thinking of Jackson, “Old Hickory” as he was known, as some kind of American hero. He did indeed win the Battle of New Orleans in the War of 1812, but did so with many acts of brutality including putting his own soldiers to death for disobedience. He parlayed his military career into a political career and was elected President.

According to Inskeep’s article, “Jackson had a captivating style, and not just because of his wild hair. He did what he wanted and demanded respect…Like Mr. Trump, Jackson made his fortune in real estate.  He bought and sold vast tracts of Southern land…(and)…if the land was owned by Indians, Jackson bullied or bribed them into selling it cheap.”

“And again, like Mr. Trump…Jackson did not worry about consistency.  Having joined the nation’s wealthy elite, he ran for president as an opponent of wealthy elites.  He defended liberty while operating a personal empire of cotton plantations using hundreds of enslaved black laborers.”

“…Jackson…enforced a certain idea of America — an America for white people. Jackson was personally cordial to people of other races, but their rights did not concern him.  When white Southerners grew tired of Indian nations in their midst, Jackson forced them into internal exile in the West. He could have defended this policy using a Trump phrase: ‘We either have a country or we don’t.'”

Like Andrew Jackson, Donald Trump has somehow struck a certain populist chord in a segment of the American electorate. Inskeep describes them as concentrated in the so-called Appalachian states “from Mississippi and Alabama all the way to western Pennsylvania and New York.” My hometown of Greenville, South Carolina is located in one of the most pro-Trump parts of the country.

Hard to believe that the Southerners I grew up with could ever vote for a brash and profane, New York billionaire.  But, as the comparison with Andrew Jackson demonstrates, similar things have happened before. I do not believe for one minute that it is impossible for Trump to secure the Republican nomination and to be elected President of these United States.

It would be a tragedy. But, unless we learn our history…we may indeed be doomed to repeat it.

And “doom” is not too strong a word.

Mission First, Buildings Second

February 15, 2016

Last Sunday, at the request of the diocesan bishop, I facilitated a congregational meeting in a local parish.  Like many churches today, they are struggling with declining numbers. They are also in a search process for a new rector.  And, over the last months, they have been hit by the discovery of huge problems with their building involving water damage, poor construction, and the deferred maintenance over many decades. Not exactly a rosy scenario!

There was to be one Sunday Eucharist which everyone would attend. As the retired bishop, I was to preside and the newly ordained interim rector would preach. The liturgy was well constructed, the sermon appropriate for the First Sunday of Lent, not dealing directly with the issues which were to be discussed at the meeting so as not to seem to prejudice the outcome or discussion. It was a surprisingly upbeat liturgy, although one could detect a note of anxiety just beneath the surface.

After getting our after-service coffee, we returned to the nave where we would have to meet since the basement parish hall was off-limits due to water damage and mold encroachment. The interim opened the meeting by introducing me and outlining the various options before them which the vestry had culled from various consultations with architects, builders, and the diocesan property committee who would have to approve the terms of any loan from the diocese should they choose to proceed to salvage the building.

The options ranged from selling the building and buying or renting elsewhere in the area, doing one of several levels of repair to the building, each of which would cost varying amounts of money, and whether or not they could realistically mount a capital campaign with their small numbers or would have to retire any loan taken out from the diocese by settling for a less-than-full-time-priest for the next three to five years.

When I took over to facilitate the discussion, I opened with a prayer and period of silence to center in and prepare for a thoughtful discussion. I then reminded them, if they needed reminding, that the church was not a building but the people.  The community which had been formed over many years could and would endure no matter what they decided to do about the building.  And I spoke of the fact that the mission was the main thing. They needed to determine what their mission was, and then determine what place the building and its future had in that.

The discussion was truly amazing. No one was angry with anyone else. No one minimized the challenges they were facing.  All options were considered “on the table.” Person after person spoke of what their mission was as a congregation, how they had probably failed to carry out that mission fully, but that this was another opportunity to get back on track.  One new member said, “I’m new here so my opinion is not as rich and deep as many of yours. I just want to say. I l love this building. But, I love the people of this church even more.”

Ninety minutes later, we concluded the meeting by narrowing the options to either commiting to do all the work necessary to really fix the building and look for new ways to use it in mission to the community or to move rather quickly to relocate and look for buyers for building and property and to think of themselves as a “new church start” in a new location.

The next steps will be to send out a summary of the meeting, complete with detailed cost  analyses and a clear statement of the choices before them,  to everyone in the parish including those who could not attend this meeting and ask for a quick turn around as to their opinions on direction. The vestry will meet in a retreat format in about two weeks and make a decision.

I do not know which direction they will pursue.  But I was proud of this Christian community for the seriousness and charity with which they conducted themselves and their commitment to “mission first, buildings second.” And I have no doubt that they will be together on whatever the decision turns out to be.

They had truly been attentive to the prayer with which I opened the meeting: “Almighty God, so draw our hearts to you, so guide our minds, so fill our imaginations, so control our wills that we may be wholly yours, utterly dedicated to you; and then use us, we pray, as you will, and always to the welfare of your people; through Jesus Christ our Lord. ” Amen.

Constitutional Fundamentalists and Biblical Originalists

February 14, 2016

Appropriate condolences and expressions of appreciation for an influential and provocative Supreme Court Justice have been offered at the unexpected death of Antonin Scalia yesterday. That is most appropriate, as would be delay in the immediate politicization of the process of approving his replacement. Let us at least observe an appropriate period for the grieving of his large family and many friends before switching on the judicial sausage-making machine.

I would like to focus instead on the many descriptions of Justice Scalia as “brilliant” and as possessing “a keen intellect.” He is universally acknowledged as a constitutional “originalist,” a method of constitutional interpretation that looks to the meaning of words and concepts as they were understood by the Founding Fathers. In other words, rather than seeing the Constitution as a “living, breathing document” he believed that it must be interpreted exactly as the 18th century framers would have understood it.

That is, it seems to me, exactly what biblical fundamentalists argue when they advocate expounding the “plain sense” of the Bible without need for interpretation, contextualization, or an understanding of progressive revelation even within the text itself. And while such Bible teachers may know the Scriptures backwards and forwards, chapter and verse, and while they may be experts in the Hebrew and Greek languages in which the original documents were written, they would not qualify as biblical “scholars” in my opinion.

Rather, they too deny that the text they study (in this case, the Bible) is a living,breathing document but rather seek to interpret it as it was originally written by its ancient authors, with their “scientific” knowledge and primitive world views. Perhaps these Bible teachers should be called “biblical originalists.” And, in that case, Justice Scalia might best be described as a “constitutional fundamentalist.”

As an African American commentator said this morning, “If the Constitution was not a living, breathing document, I would still be a slave and only worth what someone would pay for me.”

 

The Soundtrack of the Universe

February 12, 2016

At the end of his Purgatorio, Dante hear “the music of the spheres” as he ascended through nine concentric spheres of heaven in his journey toward union with God. In an article headlined “Scientists detect ripple in gravity,” the Associated Press reported that “it was just a tiny, almost imperceptible ‘chirp’, but it simultaneously opened humanity’s ears to the music of the cosmos and proved Einstein right again…”

“…Because the evidence of gravitational waves is captured in audio form, the finding means astronomers will now be able to hear the soundtrack of the universe and listen as violent collisions reshape the cosmos…”

“Until this moment, we had our eyes on the sky, and we couldn’t hear the music,’ said Columbia University’s astrophysicist Szaboles Marka, a member of the discovery team, ‘The skies will never be the same.'” Well, perhaps the skies will be the same, but surely our perception of the universe continues to broaden and deepen and perhaps “we” will never be the same.

I do not pretend to understand all the ramifications of this verification of the gravitational waves which ripple through time and space that Albert Einstein predicted over a century ago. But every discovery of an orderly universe which we can increasingly understand and verify confirms my faith in the Source behind it all, the Ordering Principle, the Ground of all Being which some of us call “God.”

There will continue to be those who see some kind of ultimate disconnect between science and religion. I am not one of those. If it is Truth, then it is true and, by whatever methods we use to apprehend it, we are increasingly being invited to share in the Mind of the Universe’s awareness of all that is.

I only lament the separation of physics from metaphysics and our continued search for “how we came to be here” without a similarly serious search for the “why we came to be here.” But it is science’s role to explore the “how” and religion’s role to explore the “why.”

Perhaps, if we listen together and honor one another’s vocation in all of this, we may one day be able to hear more clearly “the soundtrack of the universe” and discover that it is really “the music of the spheres.”

 

We’ve Got To Build A Better Politics

February 11, 2016

Yesterday, President Obama spoke to the Illinois General Assembly in Springfield. I have been to the Old Capitol Building with its marvelous statue of Abraham Lincoln (see the picture from 2013) several times rallying for responsible gun control legislation. The President was returning to the scene of his beginnings in politics to plead for a return to compromise and, most of all, civility in politics.

This is perhaps nowhere more sorely needed than in the Illinois State Legislature, mired in a battle with the new governor which has resulted in an unprecedented state budget impasse. If you think politics in Washington DC are broken, come see us in Illinois! I have just completed a term as Assisting Bishop in Chicago and live in the Quad Cities which span the Mississippi so I keep up with political goings-on both in Iowa and Illinois. We are affected by both!

Among the areas highlighted by President Obama as needing immediate attention:

  1. Limiting influence of big money in politics.
  2. Changing the way congressional districts are drawn.
  3. Making it easier for voters to register and cast ballots.
  4. Engaging in more respectful political discourse.

Some have criticized the President for calling for changes in Illinois he has not been able to implement nationally, but I would submit that because of his frustration about much that has been left unaccomplished in his administration, he sees more clearly than most what now needs to be done. I hope he will continue to work at these goals after his term in office is complete.

And, I hope whoever is elected President will begin immediately to address these issues. According to reports from Springfield, Democrats stood and applauded when he called for making it easier to register and vote; Republicans did the same when he mentioned redistricting reforms. So there can be bipartisan support for some of these things.

We just need to be sure that whoever we elect POTUS, is willing and able to work in a bipartisan manner. I concur with this quote from President Obama:

“This situation we find ourselves in today is not somehow unique or hopeless. We’ve always gone through periods when our democracy seems stuck, and when that happens, we have to find a new way of doing business. We’re in one of those moments now. We’ve got to build a better politics, one that’s less of a spectacle and more of a battle of ideas, one that’s less of a business and more of a mission, one that understands the success of the American experiment rests on our willingness to engage all our citizens in this work.”

We confess to you AND TO ONE ANOTHER

February 10, 2016

Most holy and merciful Father:  We confess to you and to one another, and to the whole communion of saints in heaven and on earth, that we have sinned by our own fault in thought word and deed; by what we have done, and by what we have left undone. (Page 267, The Book of Common Prayer)

So begins the “Litany of Penitence” Episcopalians use on this Ash Wednesday.  As much as I value the forty days of Lent as a season for prayer, fasting, and alms-giving, I must admit to increasing discomfort with our focus on begging for mercy from God, often seemingly groveling before the Holy One as “miserable sinners” not worthy to “gather up the crumbs under (God’s) table.”

Our sins don’t hurt God nearly as much as they hurt one another and ourselves. How much better if we said these words from our General Confession to each other, to the ones we have actually hurt and wronged by our thoughtless and selfish behavior:

“…I confess that I have sinned against you in thought, word, and deed, by what I have done, and by what I have left undone. I have not loved you with my whole heart; I have not loved my neighbor (either). I am truly sorry and I humbly repent. For the sake of…Jesus Christ…have mercy on me and forgive me…”

I think we need to spend a whole lot more time this Lent asking one another for forgiveness and seeking to amend our lives for those many ways we have sinned against one another. Including the broader, actually more important, categories than we usually confess, such as those included farther down in that same Litany of Penitence:

“…all our past unfaithfulness, the pride, hypocrisy and impatience of our lives…our self-indulgent appetites and ways, and our exploitation of other people…our anger at our own frustration, and our envy of those more fortunate than ourselves…our intemperate love of worldly goods and comforts, and our dishonesty in daily life and work…our waste and pollution of…creation, and our lack of concern for those who come after us.”

Yes, we have plenty of need for a season of “penitence and fasting.” Let’s just have the courage to confess our sins and ask forgiveness of the ones we have actually wounded —  one another.

 

A Tuesday That Is Really Fat

February 9, 2016

Every Shrove Tuesday I think of Bill Sanderson. He was a priest in a neighboring parish in Cocoa Beach, Florida and was in a clergy, lectionary-study group with me for six or seven years. We also played tennis together several days a week for some of those years.

I think of Bill on this day because he was something of an iconoclast and, on Shrove Tuesdays, Bill and his parish eschewed the usual “pancake supper” and held instead a steak and wine dinner. His point was, if we’re going to fast, let’s really fast and if we’re going to feast, let’s really feast.

The parish I attend now does something of the same thing. While sticking to the traditional pancake supper, they feature really good, live jazz music offered by the Manny Lopez trio, a local celebrity and his friends. The mood is entirely festive and an appropriate way to feast before the fast begins tomorrow on Ash Wednesday.

As Christians, I’m afraid we’ve really leveled out and tamed the annual cycles of feasting and fasting. Very few of us give up anything particularly significant for Lent beyond desserts or chocolate. And, with the possible exception of a few champagne receptions after the Easter Vigil, we don’t even celebrate together with much gusto.

All this is, I think, to our impoverishment. Of course, we don’t “have” to fast. We certainly should not do it to earn God’s favor or punish ourselves with some kind of penance. But, denying ourselves something, saying No to ourselves in small things can in fact strengthen our spiritual muscles so that we can say No when it is really important in life — No to cheating on our taxes…or on our spouses. No to drugs. No to revenge and violence.

Nor, I suppose, do we “have” to feast. Only if we want to celebrate the incredible gift of this fantastic universe and the beautiful “earth, our island home” on which we live. Only if we are grateful to have awakened this morning to another day of living and moving and having our being together as colleagues, friends, and lovers. Only if we recognize that none of this comes to us because we have earned it. But only because

God is good…all the time!  All the time…God is good!

And that calls for a Celebration.

Beethoven’s Seventh and the Superbowl

February 8, 2016

We had an enjoyable night at the symphony last weekend. Our fine conductor, Mark Russell Smith, has done an outstanding job with our Quad City Symphony over the years and their hard work has certainly paid off. An Edvard Grieg all-strings suite (the Holberg) was a charming Baroque-like dance and featured violist Livia Sohn did a splendid job with Samuel Barber’s energetic Concerto, Op. 14.

Maestro Smith introduced the second half of the program by reminding us that it was Super Bowl Sunday and that we should, at the end of the concert, ponder the question, “Which takes more energy: The Super Bowl halftime show or Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony?” Chuckling, he suggested, “You know the answer to that!”

Besides the fact that neither this year’s Super Bowl game nor its halftime show lived up to expectations, I think Mark’s observation is correct. I have loved the driving rhythmic motives of Beethoven’s Seventh since college days and I can honestly say I have rarely heard it better performed than last Saturday night. Four standing O’s suggest the audience felt the same.

During the intermission, Susanne engaged a couple of young women sitting near us, a new mother on a Mom’s night out with her younger college friend. They had played stringed instruments in school and were thoroughly enjoying themselves. But when Susanne asked them how many of their friends liked classical music, one of them looked around at the milling audience and said, “It is sort of like being in a nursing home, isn’t it?”

I thought, “Yeah, and like being in my church most Sundays!” I wonder if there is a connection between the lack of interest of so many younger people in church and their absence in church? Since my church at least seems to major in pretty traditional music and hymnody, the connection seems likely. Yet, we hear from so many of them that just featuring “contemporary” music and dumbing down the liturgy is not what they are interested in. They want us to be authentic…and to walk our talk out there in the real world.

Maybe if we really did those things, younger folks might hang in there with us long enough to experience the soul lifting involvement with a fine organ, choir and the full congregational participation that liturgical worship, at its best, can provide.

There’s as much energy in that as in even a good Super Bowl halftime show!

In The Light of His Glory and Grace

February 7, 2016

Turn your eyes upon Jesus/ Look full in his wonderful face; And the things of earth will grow strangely dim/ in the light of his glory and grace.

I remember singing the words to this sweet (maybe even saccharine!) hymn in a dimly lit chapel at All Saints’ Episcopal Church in Winter Park, Florida as a young teenager. We would always close our youth group meeting with a quiet service of Compline in the little chapel. The two texts we would sing were, invariably,  the Nunc Dimittis  and this little song.

For all its simplicity, the words convey the central theme of the Transfiguration which we celebrate this Sunday, and perhaps the central claim of the Christian faith. Which is: that when we look at Jesus of Nazareth, we can see all we need to know about God.

Our complicated trinitarian dogmas enshrined in fourth-century creeds attempt to tell us a whole lot more about God than that and they were noble attempts to explain the unexplainable and define the indefinable. But they often do more harm than good when they are seen as a kind of theological litmus test for ‘true believers.’

The God of the universe, the Source of all that is, the Ground of our very Being is far beyond anything we can fathom or get our minds around. But our claim, as Christians, is that — just like Peter, James and John on the Mount of Transfiguration — when we turn our eyes upon Jesus.  And look full on his wonderful face. Then the things of earth (including our need to say more than we need to say about God ) will grow strangely dim. In the light of his glory and grace.

When we look at Jesus, we can see all we need to know about God.

What Does “Walking Together” Really Mean?

February 6, 2016

Much has been made in recent weeks about the Anglican Primates’ meeting and their decision to continue to “walk together” as a world communion despite disagreements, chiefly in the area of marriage equality. I join many in affirming that decision and yet, given the “consequences” suggesting that the Episcopal Church be excluded from sending representatives to certain global church forums, I wonder what “walking together” really means in this case.

In a recent press release from the Vatican headlined Pope extends new olive branch to China, “the pope explained that his view of dialogue is one in which neither side compromises or carves out its foothold, but both decide to ‘walk together’ respecting differences.'” The phrase “walk together” is obviously what captured my attention, but the fact that it is book-ended by “neither side compromises or carves out its foothold” and “respecting differences” is what is really important.

If the Bishop of Rome can foresee walking together with an officially atheistic nation, respecting the vast differences but not seeking to compromise or carve out its foothold, surely sisters and brothers in the Anglican Communion can find a way for its various Provinces to do the same.

Otherwise, what indeed does “walking together” really mean?