Archive for the ‘The Episcopal Church’ Category

Apostle to the Apostles

April 10, 2007

It is absolutely clear from all four Gospels that women were the first to discover the empty tomb! In Matthew, it is Mary Magdalene and “the other” Mary. In Mark it is Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome. In Luke it is  Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and “the other women.” And in John, it’s Mary Magdalene alone. So…who’s the common figure here? Mary Magdalene!

No wonder the Orthodox regard her as a disciple, even “Apostle to the Apostles,” and venerate her as the patron saint of the great cluster of monasteries on Mount Athos.

One thing is clear from the Gospel accounts: the men had fled! The “twelve” who were supposed to make up some kind of inner circle had betrayed him and left him to face torture and crucifixion alone (only the young John may have made it to the foot of the cross to stand with Jesus’ mother). It was the women disciples, chief among them apparently Mary Magdalene, who risked being associated with him still further even after his execution at the hands of the state by going to the tomb.

Even after dragging Peter there to witness the emptiness of the tomb, that was all he experienced at first – emptiness — and he returned home without pursuing it further. Luke tells us that the 12 initially considered the report of an empty tomb “an idle tale.” But Mary wouldn’t give up! She went back to the tomb, weeping. I’ve never been sure if she was weeping because of her grief at the loss of Jesus or her grief at the loss of nerve of the 12! But she wouldn’t give up! She peered once again, even deeper this time, into the tomb and when she turned around, she encountered the Risen Christ!

Not that she recognized him right away. At first she thought it was the gardener. But he spoke her name and immediately she knew who he was! Not a Jesus who had somehow escaped death. Not some kind of resuscitated corpse. But a wonderfully transfigured and transformed Teacher who was being taken up into the life of God 

“Do not hold on to me because I have not yet ascended to the Father, but go to my brothers and say to them, I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.” And this time, she was able to tell the 12 – not only that the tomb was empty, but “I have seen the Lord!” (John 20:18)

Surely Mary Magdalene’s journey must be ours this Easter season. Not to be content with the Easter morning vision of an empty tomb. But to return to it again and again, persistently, peering into it, ever more deeply. Until we hear him call us by name. And send us forth as his witnesses! Apostles to future apostles!

Like Mary…first at the tomb!

               

The Light Shines In The Darkness

April 8, 2007

It is sunrise on Easter morning. The sky is pinkening in the east and soon the sun will filter brightly into our living room, high overlooking the East River and the borough of Queens. The apartment is quiet. Soon my wife will awake and we will prepare to meet some family for “the paschal mystery,” the Easter Eucharist.

There we will hear Luke’s account of Jesus’ Resurrection and his remembrance in Acts of how Peter preached about it in the early days of the Church’s life. We will hear the author of Colossians remind us that we have died and that now our life lies hidden with Christ in God.

But the Lesson at Morning Prayer was from the first chapter of John! A “strange” reading for Easter day and one which I usually associate with Christmas. Yet there it is, the Easter message: “The light shines in the darkness and the darkness did not overcome it.” (John 1:5)

Among the several miracles of Easter, that is the one I am most grateful for this morning. That despite the best efforts of the religious establishment and the Roman government, the light of Christ still shines. Despite the struggles and confusion of the early Christians, the light of Christ still shines. Despite the on-again-off-again attempts of the Church to be faithful down through the centuries and in the face of our many sins, the light of Christ still shines.

Why does it shine? For what purpose does it shine? “That We All May Be One!” One with God. One with each other. May our Easter celebration across the world remind us of that calling and give us both the will to pursue it and the grace to accomplish it.

Now, the apartment is flooded with light! The sun is risen.

The Son is Risen!

Alleluia!

The Way of the Cross – The Way to Peace

April 6, 2007

Today I walked the Way of the Cross through the frigid streets of New York with Pax Christi. For twenty-five years this Catholic peace group has organized this Good Friday event as a public witness to the Passion of Christ and its relationship to issues of justice and peace. 

I.  We prayed the First Station “Jesus is condemned to death” at the United Nations around the theme of torture.  “Jesus, victim of torture, help us help all victims of torture.”

II. We prayed the Second Station “Jesus is made to carry the cross” opposite the Nigerian Consulate around the theme of Darur.  “May we find the strength to defend those who have no voice.”

III. We prayed the Third Station “Jesus falls the first time” across from the Jewish Simon Wiesenthal Tolerance Center around the theme of discrimination, particularly against Middle Eastern people.  “Forgive our violence toward each other.”

IV. We prayed the Fourth Station “Jesus meets his mother” in front of the Pfizer Pharaceutical Company seeking a world initiative to eradicate AIDS.  “Loving God, open our hearts to your word.”

V. We prayed the Fifth Station “Simon of Cyrene is forced to help carry the cross” on 42nd Street and 3rd Avenue in front of many shops and the Woolworth Tower around the themes of employment, wages and immigration. “Te lo pedimos, Senor (We ask you, O God).”

VI. We prayed the Sixth Station “Veronica wipes the face of Jesus” in front of the Grand Hyatt Hotel and Grand Central Station around the theme of helping the stranger. “God of mercy and justice, hear our prayer.”

VII. We prayed the Seventh Station “Jesus falls the second time” near the commercial banks of Madison Avenue on the theme of We, the privileged; we, the disenfranchised. “Oyenos, O Dios! (Hear us, O God)!”

VIII. We prayed the Eighth Station “Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem” opposite the New York Public Library around the theme of education, a national priority? “We pray that no child is denied the joys and happiness of a true childhood.”

IX. We prayed the Ninth Station “Jesus falls the third time” opposite Bryant Park on the theme of mother earth falling under the weight of consumerism. “Forgive us all.”

X. We prayed the Tenth Station “Jesus is stripped of his garments” on a grungy city street between Sixth Avenue and Broadway remembering our city stripped of affordable housing, “O God, hear our prayer.”

XI. We prayed the Eleventh Station “Jesus is nailed to the cross” at the busiest Armed Forces Recruiting Station in the country seeing our society nailed to the cross of militarization. “God of peace, forgive us.”

XII. We prayed the Twelfth Station “Jesus dies on the cross” at the same location in Times Square in opposition to the death penalty. “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.”

XIII. We prayed the Thirteenth Station “Jesus is taken down from the cross” in front of the world’s largest McDonald’s restaurant asking the question, Will this culture sustain us? “Enough for everyone, forever!”

XIV. We prayed the Fourteenth Station “Jesus is laid in the tomb” beneath Disney Enterprises, Madame Tussaud’s and many garish billboards recognizing our need to find quiet space in the busy city for Jesus. “O God, help us to hear you.”

XV. We prayed the Fifteenth and final Station “The Resurrection of Jesus” in a spirit of recommitment. “We lay down our sword and shield. We will not study war any more.”

WHO WILL SPEAK IF WE DON’T?  WHO WILL SPEAK IF WE DON’T?

WHO WILL SPEAK SO THEIR VOICE WILL BE HEARD? OH, WHO WILL SPEAK IF WE DON’T?     

   

Just What Is “A Den Of Robbers” Anyway?

April 3, 2007

There was a wonderful piece in The Christian Century magazine last week by Marcus Borg and John Dominic Crossan. It’s entitled “Collision Course” and it traces the events of Holy Week in the Gospel according to Mark.

 

It begins on Palm Sunday, of course, and speaks of two processions toward Jerusalem on that day. The first procession came from the western city of Caesarea. That procession was headed by the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, astride his war horse. Ever since a couple of riots had taken place in the Holy City on or around Passover, a cohort of Roman soldiers had been sent up to Jerusalem to reinforce the troops there and quell any possible trouble.

The second procession, from the east, was – of course – headed by Jesus, astride his donkey, acting out the prophecy from Zechariah which speaks of a king of peace on a donkey, banishing the war horse and the weapons of war from the land.  The two were on a “collision course:” Jesus versus Pilate — the nonviolence of the kingdom of God versus the violence of the Empire. The authors say that Lent and Holy Week are about Christians repenting for being in the wrong procession! We too often line up with the empire when we should be lining up with Jesus!

Palm Sunday night finds Jesus entering the temple, looking around, and then heading out of town to Bethany with his 12 friends. It was late by that time, and you don’t conduct demonstrations when nobody is around. So, he returns on Monday and matches his demonstration against Roman political power with one against the temple authorities. They had collaborated with the imperial system, and profited from it.

So, he turns the tables on them on Monday and calls the temple a “den of robbers.” I had never thought about it, but a den of robbers is not where robbers rob, but a “safe house” to which they return after having robbed somewhere else. It’s not what they were doing in the temple that was the problem. It’s what they were doing to the poor in their daily lives!

On Tuesday  Jesus gets into a series of conflicts with the temple authorities and finally ends up with what we sometimes call the “little apocalypse” in Mark 13 where he warns of the eventual destruction of the temple. He would have been arrested right then except that he was protected by the “pro Jesus” crowd who actually did regard Jesus at least as a prophet. So the authorities let him alone and he went away.

On Wednesday, the authorities give up and simply hope Jesus will eventually return to Galilee and leave them alone. But Judas, perhaps concerned about this as well, offers to find Jesus one evening so that they can arrest him without his supportive crowd. On Thursday night, Jesus shares a final meal with his closest friends and is arrested in a wooded area later that night.

His interrogation, torture and execution, of course, take place on Friday. That event is even recorded in extra-biblical history. The Jewish historian Josephus writes, “Pilate, upon hearing him accused by men of the highest standing among us, had condemned him to be crucified.”

Jesus is put to death by imperial power. Only to be raised, three days later, by divine power. The powers-that-be said “No” to Jesus. But God said “Yes.”  And it is that divine “Yes” that we are preparing to celebrate this week!

Don’t Be In The Wrong Palm Sunday Procession!

March 31, 2007

“We begin with Palm Sunday. Two processions entered Jerusalem at the beginning of the week of Passover, a tinderbox time in the city, with the Jewish people celebrating divine deliverance from the past Egyptian Empire while under the present Roman Empire. Two very large and very lethal riots took place precisely at Passover in the generations before and after (the year) 30 CE.

And so, at each Passover, the Roman governor — Pilate in the time of Jesus — rode up to Jerusalem from the imperial capital Caesarea on the coast at the head of a cohort of imperial cavalry and troops to reinforce the Roman garrison in Jerusalem as a deterrent against and preparation for any possible trouble. Pilate’s procession, arriving from the west, symbolized and actualized Roman imperial power.

Jesus entered the city from the east in another procession, a counterprocession. Whereas Pilate rode into the city on a war horse, Jesus entered on a donkey. Mark makes it clear that Jesus planned it in advance: he tells his disciples to go into a village to get a donkey and says, ‘If anyone says to you, Why are you doing this? just say this, the Lord needs it and will send it back here immediately.’

Implicitly in Mark 11:1-11 and explicitely in Matthew 21:4-5, the symbolism makes use of Zechariah 9:9-10, which speaks of a king of peace on a donkey who will banish the war horse and the battle bow from the land.

The contrast is clear: Jesus versus Pilate, the non-violence of the kingdom of God versus the violence of empire. Two arrivals, two entrances, two processions — and our Christian Lent is about repentance for being in the wrong one and preparation to abandon it for its alternative.” (“Collision Course,” Marcus Borg and John Dominic Crossan, “The Christian Century,” March 20, 2007)

An Irrevocable Covenant?

March 29, 2007

Ever since St. Paul struggled with conflicted feelings about his own “kindred” (see Romans 9-11) Christians have wrestled with our relationship with the Jewish people. From the sad history of Christian anti-Semitism to improved relations after World War II and especially after Vatican II, right on down to present-day disagreements (or at least tensions) about the situation in Israel-Palestine, it has never been easy.

While Anglicans have never been quite as clear as our Roman Catholic colleagues (for example, in the Vatican II document “Nostra Aetate”) about God’s irrevocable covenant with the Jews, a recent joint declaration by the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Chief Rabbis of Israel comes close when it says, of the relationship between Jews and Christians:

“Our relationship is unique, not only historically and culturally but also scripturally, and for both religions, is rooted in the one overarching covenant of God with Abraham to which God remains faithful through all time.” As far as interfaith dialogue is concerned, “Neither evangelism nor conversion has a place amongst the purpose of the dialogue and we emphasize the importance of respect for each other’s faith and of rejecting actions intended to undermine the integrity of the other.”

For myself, I believe that God’s covenant with the Jewish people is irrevocable and that we Christians are best understood as “…a wild olive shoot grafted in their place to share the rich root of the olive tree.” (Romans 11:17). We are not to “boast over the branches” but to “remember that it is not you who support the root, but the root that supports you.” 

     

Much To Say; Much To Condemn

March 27, 2007

Today we remember Charles Henry Brent in our church calendar. He was our first missionary bishop in the Philippines and later Bishop of Western New York.

In an earlier post (“When truth stumbles in the public square”) I shared my concern about the “extra judicial” killings going on these days in the Philippines. The retired “Obispo Maximo” (presiding bishop) of our full communion partner, Iglesia Filipina Independiente (the Philippine Independent Church) — with whom I spent several days in Manila just over a year ago — was murdered in his convent retirement quarters not long ago.  

In today’s Gospel for Tuesday in the Fifth Week of Lent, Jesus says, “I have much to say about you and much to condemn; but the one who sent me is true, and I declare to the world what I have heard from him.” (John 8:26)

Surely, our sisters and brothers in the Philippines also have “much to say…and much to condemn.” The One who sent them to us “is true.” And they are “declaring to the world” what they heard and seen.

With them in mind, may we offer today a Lenten prayer written by Bishop Brent, one we pray every Friday in our Prayer Book: “Lord Jesus Christ, you stretched out your arms of love on the hard wood of the cross that everyone might come within the reach of your saving embrace: So clothe us in your Spirit that we, reaching forth our hands in love, may bring those who do not know you to the knowledge and love of you; for the honor of your Name.” Amen  

Where True Joys Are To Be Found

March 25, 2007

The Sunday “Collects” of the Book of Common Prayer (weekly prayers which “collect” the aspirations of the day) are often nearly as rich as the lessons from Scripture appointed for a given day. They are products of centuries of devotion and meditation. Today’s is Thomas Cranmer’s adaptation of an Easter prayer from the Gelasian sacramentary:

“Almighty God, you alone can bring into order the unruly wills and affections of sinners: Grant your people grace to love what you command and desire what you promise; that, among the swift and varied changes of the world, our hearts may surely there be fixed where true joys are to be found; through Jesus Christ our Lord…”

First, we acknowledge that it is only by the power of God that our sinful ways can be tamed. But how does God do that? By crushing our “unruly wills?” By condemning us for our sometimes sinful “affections?” No…by granting us “grace.”

By assuring us of his unmerited favor toward us — in all times and in all places — God gradually transfigures those “wills and affections” until we come actually to love what God commands and to desire what God has promised us! In other words, instead of seeing the commandments as impossible standards of behavior, an awareness of the love and mercy and the true nature of God finally makes it possible for us to love what God loves and to desire what he wants for us!

As that begins to happen, we find ourselves increasingly untroubled by the confusing and complex times in which we live, both in the world and in the church. In fact, our “hearts” (the center of our human personalities) more and more find their rest in God alone — that solid and unchangeable Source of all that is.

That Source is surely “where true joys are to be found!”           

He Comes As Yet Unknown

March 23, 2007

Friday in the Fourth Week of Lent  (Wisdom 2: 1a, 12-24; Psalm 34:15-22; John 7:1-2, 10, 25-30)

For millennia believers who share the faith of Abraham in the one God have tried to describe their ideal Prophet, the One they have hoped for and looked forward to, and looked up to as an exemplar.

 

The Psalmist describes him this way: “Many are the troubles of the righteous, but the Lord will deliver him out of them all.  He will keep safe all his bones; not one of them shall be broken…the Lord ransoms the life of his servants, and none will be punished who trust in him.”  

Decades before Jesus was born, the author of the Wisdom of Solomon describes how “the ungodly” might view such a person: “Let us lie in wait for the righteous man, because he is inconvenient to us and opposes our actions…He professes to have knowledge of God, and calls himself a child of the Lord…he calls the last end of the righteous happy, and boasts that God is his father. Let us see if his words are true, and let us test what will happen at the end of his life…”

And, during Jesus’ lifetime, some of the people of Jerusalem said about him, “Is not this the man whom they are trying to kill? And here he is, speaking openly, but they say nothing to him! Can it be that the authorities really know that this is the Messiah?”

Here is how a contemporary of ours tries to describe him: “He comes as yet unknown into a hamlet of Lower Galilee. He is watched by the cold, hard eyes of peasants living long enough at the subsistence level to know exactly where the line is drawn between poverty and destitution. He looks like a beggar yet his eyes lack the proper cringe, his voice the proper whine, his walk the proper shuffle.

He speaks about the rule of God and they listen as much from curiosity as anything else. They know all about rule and power, about kingdom and empire, but they know it in terms of tax and debt, malnutrition and sickness, agrarian oppression and demonic possession.

What, they really want to know, can this Kingdom of God do for a lame child, a blind parent, a demented soul screaming its tortured isolation among the graves that mark the village fringes? Jesus walks among the tombs and, in the silence after the exorcism, the villagers listen once more, but now with curiosity giving way to cupidity, fear, and embarrassment.

He is invited, as honor demands, to the home of the village leader. He goes, instead, to stay in the home of the dispossessed woman. Not quite proper, to be sure, but it would be unwise to censure an exorcist, to criticize a magician… But the next day he leaves them and now they wonder aloud about a divine Kingdom with no respect for proper protocols, a Kingdom, as he had said, not just for the poor like themselves, but for the destitute.

Others say that the worst and most powerful demons are not found in small villages but in certain cities. Maybe, they say, that was where the exorcised demon went, to Sepphoris or Tiberias, or even Jerusalem, or maybe to Rome itself where its arrival would hardly be noticed amidst so many others already in residence. But some say nothing at all and ponder the possibility of catching up with Jesus before he gets too far.” (The Essential Jesus by John Dominic Crossan, page11)

Well, we may never catch up with Jesus. He is always way ahead of us! We may, each of us, describe him in somewhat different ways. But, as we approach this Table, we will all receive him in his fullness, as he truly is. And we can all pray to him in this Lenten season in these words:

“Lord Jesus Christ, you stretched out your arms of love on the hard wood of the cross that everyone might come within the reach of your saving embrace: So clothe us in your Spirit that we, reaching forth our hands in love, may bring those who do not know you to the knowledge and love of you; for the honor of your Name.” Amen.  

    

What The Bishops Didn’t Do

March 22, 2007

There seems to be a good bit of reaction already to statements and decisions coming out of our recently completed House of Bishops meeting. A summary of those actions can be found in prior posts…and on www.episcopalchurch.org through the releases over Episcopal News Service.

What we did NOT do was to foreclose discussion on the Episcopal Church’s response to the main requests of the Primates’ Communique. We have not “ruled” on whether or not to reassure the Primates that General Convention meant what it said when it asked us and our Standing Committees not to give consent to any bishop-elect whose manner of life might prove of concern to the wider Anglican Communion and to clarify for them the status of the blessing of same-sex relationships in this church.

That is not our decision alone,  and the Executive Council has already set into motion a study and consultation process which will continue through the summer. Similarly, the House of Bishops Theology Committee is at work on a study document to assist in this process.

As to the proposed “Pastoral Council” and its relationship to any “Primatial Vicar” the Presiding Bishop might appoint, we believe it is unconstitutional, uncanonical, and of potentially great threat to the Episcopal Church. We have said so and urged Executive Council (our highest legislative body between General Convention) to decline to participate in it.

We had to make our mind known on this because the appointment process to the proposed “Pastoral Council” is already underway and our Presiding Bishop needed some kind of guidance as to whether or not to appoint the minority of members the Episcopal Church is supposed to provide to this novel and quite unnecessary proposed body.

What the Episcopal Church’s bishops did not do is claim some kind of prelacy like the Primates have done, and to act in a high handed manner not permissable under the polity of either the Episcopal Church or the Anglican Communion.