Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Surely The Presence of the Lord Is In This Place

July 9, 2016

Challenged by Brandi Riley’s powerful live video on Facebook, imploring white people to get involved, to raise their voices because black folks cannot do this — call for justice and an end to police (and other) violence — alone, I joined a march yesterday.

Sponsored by a coalition of churches and community organizations here in the Quad Cities, we marched from police headquarters in Rock Island, Illinois across the Centennial Bridge, to headquarters in Davenport, Iowa. As we marched we chanted the familiar “No justice, no peace” and “Hands up, don’t shoot.”

One of the leaders, at the start of the march, made our intentions clear, “We will not turn this into another Dallas. Anyone bent on provoking violence can go back to your car now.” There was no violence. Here are excerpts from some of the speeches we heard:

“Is everybody here black?” No, the crowd responded. “Is everybody here white?” No, the crowd roared. “We’re here because we respect humanity. When black people are killed, I hurt. When civilians are killed, I hurt. When police are killed, I hurt. A life is a life. Until we resemble what we see today, people of all backgrounds respecting life, until that day comes, we have to shout to all people that black lives matter. Because obviously too many people don’t think those lives matter.”

“We don’t hate cops,” a young woman said, “I don’t want to be a mother standing over a casket.” And another organizer summed it all up, “We’re here to share our concern, share our love, and share our will to say that things have got to change. We can start change in our community.”

I hope so. This is the first march I have participated in since the Trayvon Martin murder. After that event, there were a few meetings here of community leaders and clergy but things sort of fizzled out. We have a short attention span in this country. We are numbed to gun violence and systemic racism.

But this is the only way things will change. Yesterday, I called for continuing hard work against racism and for sensible gun laws. Even more important are ongoing conversations between black people and white people, between law enforcement and the citizenry to build the kind of trust necessary for genuine and lasting change to begin to happen.

I was proud to be a Christian yesterday. Even though there were Muslims, Buddhists and people of no faith in the crowd, the spirit of the black church was much in evidence. When a young pastor closed our time in prayer, he acknowledged the presence of many faiths and none and he expressed his respect for them all. But then he asked their indulgence while he prayed, with integrity, out of the faith which brought him there. The powerful prayer ended in the Name of Jesus.

I don’t believe anyone was offended.

Because his spirit was surely present in that place.

 

Baton Rouge…St. Paul…Dallas

July 8, 2016

Just a few thoughts about these last awful days: First of all, it hardly needs to be said, but must be, that at the root of it all, is white racism. Whether or not the police officers in Baton Rouge or St. Paul were themselves racists or whether the killings of the young black men were even motivated by racism, white racism is nonetheless at the root of it.

Racism is not the same as prejudice. The definition of racism is “bias plus power equals racism.” A powerless person cannot be a racist. He or she may be prejudiced (making pre-judgments about others) or even a bigot. But a powerless person cannot be a racist…by definition. So, we live in a racist society where white people (white men, more specifically) have the power. When that is coupled with bias or prejudice, you have racism and a racist society.

Black people especially (among other people of color) are victims of this racism. They have been denied adequate housing and education, they have been denied employment opportunities, they have been denied their basic humanity. Most white people are afraid of black people, black men especially. They have become dehumanized.

Many police officers are afraid of black men, and are therefore hyper-vigilant when confronting a black person for some alleged violation of the law. I believe it is that fear, borne of generational racism, that is at the root of so many of the recent killings of black men by police officers.

Secondly, our society is awash in guns. We often think of white, redneck types as the most likely to “conceal and carry” but the epidemic of black on black murder on the South Side of Chicago makes it crystal clear that lots of black youth are carrying weapons as well these days. Both the recent victims, in Louisiana and Minnesota, were carrying handguns. One was apparently properly licensed, the other most likely was not. Does anyone seriously believe that the fear of a black man reaching for his weapon was not at the root of these police officers firing precipitously?

Now, we have another black man in Dallas who, enraged and full of hatred, used yet another gun, this time a high powered rifle (perhaps schooled by military training) to mow down and kill five innocent police officers, wounding others and some civilians as well. The bitter irony is that these officers were trying to protect the rights and safety of those who were protesting the actions of some of their fellow officers!

Think about this vicious cycle: Two young black men, victims of white racism all their lives, carry  concealed handguns. Frightened (and perhaps angry) white cops, believing that these men might be going for those guns pump multiple rounds into their bodies, resulting in their deaths. People around the nation organize peaceful protests against this action and another black man, armed with a powerful weapon himself, slaughters five more.

Two concealed handguns, two police weapons, one (at least) long rifle. Seven innocent lives lost…needlessly…again.

What are we to do? Engage in the ongoing war against racism. Get to know your neighbor of color. Speak out against racist remarks and actions. Try to determine how the policies and positions of your elected officials (from city council to the presidency) serve to either advance or retard racism in our society and vote accordingly.

Secondly, do all you can to support efforts for effective gun control in this country. That will likely mean local and state efforts since the will to do something on the national level seems lacking. Of course such things as banning assault weapons, limiting magazine capacity, assuring that there are effective background checks on gun purchasers will not eliminate gun violence. But if there are no laws on the books, or if those laws are not being effectively enforced, then we have no way to prosecute those we do find in possession of these weapons of mass destruction. Saving one life, such as the ones we lost this week, would be worth it.

These are just initial thoughts, ramblings, I guess. We will all be processing this for weeks, months, years. Please, God, help us to do something about it. This time…

Those Damn Emails Again!

July 6, 2016

“I’m sick and tired of hearing about your damn e-mails!” So once said Bernie Sanders during one of the primary debates with Hillary Clinton, delighting Democrats everywhere. We shall see if he is able to maintain that same posture after F.B.I. Director James Comey’s announcement that no criminal charges would be recommended by his agency against Clinton for her handling of classified material on non-personal email servers while, at the same time, questioning her judgement. Personally, I hope Sanders will continue to take the high ground.

However, I do have to agree with a Republican strategist who said yesterday, “Any day a  campaign has to say, ‘Well, at least she didn’t get indicted’ is a bad day for that campaign.” No kidding! Having said that, I doubt that this announcement will have much influence on the outcome of November’s elections (except taking up valuable air time which could be spent on discussion of substantive issues about which Clinton and Donald Trump disagree). Hillary’s opponents will see a “vast left wing conspiracy” at work. Her supporters will minimize the seriousness of the F.B.I.’s findings and point out that Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice did substantially the same thing. Actually, no, they didn’t.

As is so often the case, today’s New York Times editorial says it best: “As Mrs. Clinton said in the past, and her campaign reiterated on Tuesday, her decision to use private email was a mistake. She remains, far and away, the most experienced and knowledgeable candidate for the presidency, particularly compared with Donald Trump. But she has done damage to her reputation by failing to conform to the established security policies of the department she ran and by giving evasive or misleading answers about her actions and motivations. If there was ever a time that Mrs. Clinton needed to demonstrate that she understands the forthrightness demanded to those who hold the nation’s highest office, this is the moment.”

I could not agree more. And, if I was Secretary Clinton’s campaign manager, I would suggest immediately scheduling an hour long, one-on-one television interview with some respected journalist (if there are any left — maybe Lester Holt or Brian Williams; Andrea Mitchell has become a Hillary hater for some reason, and Rachel Madow would be seen to be too partisan).

In this interview Clinton should answer forthrightly any and all questions, avoid her usual hyper-defensiveness, and show some genuine contrition and vulnerability which can be so winsome when she lets herself reveal it.  That would go a long way toward restoring the confidence of her base without the temptation for them to minimize her “careless” (not”reckless,” as Rudy Gulianni falsely quoted Comey) decisions about emails and private servers.

Having gotten herself into this mess, Hillary could at least use it to demonstrate that she does not believe herself to be above the law or someone to whom the rules do not apply.

 

 

Have A Thoughtful Fourth!

July 4, 2016

We were reminded last week by the Vice President of our Episcopal Church’s House of Deputies, Byron Rushing (longtime African American state legislator in Massachusetts) to be careful in appropriating Christian symbols and values uncritically to our Fourth of July celebrations. For example, this prayer, often used on Independence Day, is offensive to many and not completely true anyway:

“Lord God Almighty, in whose Name the founders of this country won liberty for themselves and for us, and lit the torch of freedom for nations then unborn: Grant that we and the people of this land may have grace to maintain our liberties in righteousness and peace…”

Leaving aside the question of whether the “Founding Fathers” did what they did in God’s name, it is clear that they won liberty primarily for themselves and certainly not for the enslaved people they continued to “own,” Native Americans they continued to slaughter, and women who did not have the right to vote for their leaders for over a century.

Byron Rushing suggests the substitution of another prayer we often use For the Nation: “Lord God Almighty, you have made all people of the earth for your glory, to serve you in freedom and in peace: Give to the people of our country a zeal for justice and the strength of forbearance, that we may use our liberty in accordance with your gracious will…”  This, at least, sets us into the context of all the “people of the earth” and recognizes that we have a long way in establishing “liberty and justice for all.”

I also chafe at the ease with which we often appropriate texts about the “Promised Land” in the Old Testament, clearly referring to Israel, as now somehow applying to this new “promised land” of these United States. This is clearly “eisegesis” (reading something into the text) rather than “exegesis” (extracting meaning from the text). Therefore, I was happy that our morning Reading from the Wisdom literature of the Apocrypha avoids this tendency and really gives us something to think about:

“A wise magistrate educates his people, and the rule of an intelligent person is well ordered. As the people’s judge is, so are his officials; as the ruler of the city is, so are all its inhabitants. An undisciplined king ruins his people, but a city becomes fit to live in through the understanding of its rulers. The government of the earth is in the hand of the Lord, and over it he will raise up the right leader for the right time.”

“Human success is in the hand of the Lord, and it is he who confers honor upon the lawgiver. Do not get angry with your neighbor for every injury, and do not resort to acts of insolence. Arrogance is hateful to the Lord and to mortals, and injustice is outrageous to both. Sovereignty passes from nation to nation on account of injustice and insolence and wealth.” (Ecclesiasticus 10:1-8, 12-18)

Well, God may well “raise up the right leader for the right time.” But, in this country at least, that depends upon getting a majority of the people’s votes. And we have some pretty important choices to make this time around.

So, I will spend a few hours of this Independence Day registering new voters at the Bettendorf, Iowa July 4th Festival! Happy Fourth!

 

 

 

 

Letter Sent This Morning

July 2, 2016

To the Editor:

I grow extremely weary of the succession of letters to the editor such as Justine Carlson’s “Clinton can’t be trusted” on July 2, accusing the presumptive Democratic nominee for President of being “a chronic liar involved in many scandals (and) numerous violations while Secretary of State…” and on and on.

Hillary Rodham Clinton is the most qualified person to run for the presidency in U.S. history. She has deep Midwestern roots, hailing from Chicago, finished off with a world class education at Wellesley and Yale Law School. Rather than signing up for a lucrative career in a Wall Street law firm she began her dedicated life of public service by co-founding the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families and, in 1978, was appointed the first female chair of the Legal Services Corporation. She is a devout Methodist, being heavily influenced in her youth by a progressive youth pastor who once took her to hear Martin Luther King speak, which changed her life.

She was given unprecedented responsibility as First Lady by her husband, Bill and was ahead of her time in working for health care reform. Even though frustrated in that effort she was able to create programs for children’s health insurance, adoption, and foster care. When she was subpoenaed in the trumped up Whitewater controversy, no charges were brought against her related to this or any other controversies in her life. She remained faithful to her husband after his heartless betrayal with Monica Lewinsky and many others. Is she to be criticized for this?

As U.S. Senator from New York and as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has indeed revealed a somewhat more “hawkish” foreign policy perspective than even I am comfortable with, having voted for the ill-fated invasion of Iraq (led astray by faulty Bush-era intelligence) for which she has apologized. But she also advocated a stronger military response to the deteriorating situation in Syria which, had President Obama heeded her advice, might have prevented the disaster present there now resulting in the development of ISIS.

In short, let us concentrate on Secretary Clinton’s actual record and stop repeating the unsubstantiated lies which continue to be spread by her adversaries. And let us hope that, come January of 2017, we will have another President Clinton and not a President Trump.

 

Christopher Epting

Bettendorf, Iowa

 

 

Remembering A Colleague

June 30, 2016

We lost another colleague from the House of Bishops yesterday. I guess at my age, I should expect that to happen with increasing regularity as the years roll on. Ed Salmon was the 13th Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina. We served together for over 25 years as bishops, he was elected two years after me and at an older age, having served as a parish priest longer than I ever did.

In fact, the first time I met Ed we were visiting his large parish — the Church of St. Michael’s and St. George’s in St. Louis (I used to wonder why they didn’t just call it All Saints’ and be done with it!). I was serving, as a new bishop, on the Episcopal Church’s Standing Commission on Evangelism and we were visiting ‘happening’ places to see how evangelism was best being done around the church in preparation for what we were calling “A Decade of Evangelism” planned for the 1990s.

I arrived at the church early one weekday morning and found Ed Salmon in a powder blue jump suit, happily preparing scrambled eggs and sausage singe-handedly for a group of about twenty-five youngish businessmen who would shortly arrive for an early morning Bible study before heading off to work.

I remember Ed preparing the breakfast which others would then help him serve before he moved into conducting a lively Bible study and discussion with this men’s group. It was only one of many successful programs in this large parish which continues today to be a leading light in Episcopal evangelical circles in the Midwest and beyond.

Bishop Salmon was a more conservative bishop than I and we often disagreed on trends and directions of the Episcopal Church in the 1990s and early 2000s. Episcopal bishops sit at round tables of eight or so when we meet so that we can get to know one another better in a small group rather than (as used to happen) sitting in legislative rows where it is easier to make speeches than it is to listen to one another.

On more than one occasion, Ed and I shared such a small group experience and I always found him to be a gentle soul and a man of integrity. He was a bridge builder who fought hard to keep his conservative Diocese of South Carolina in the Episcopal Church even when he himself disagreed with some of the decision we made in General Convention.

He was grieved when his successor Mark Lawrence successfully led the diocese out of the Episcopal Church and yet, throughout his remaining ministry as a bishop and while serving in retirement as a seminary dean, sought to build bridges and relationships with the breakaway Episcopalians (who persist in calling themselves “Anglicans” of one stripe or another even though they are not members of the worldwide Anglican Communion and the Episcopal Church is).

While I served as ecumenical officer for the Episcopal Church, Ed and I worked together to find ways for clergy ordained in the breakaway bodies who wished to return to the Episcopal Church (of which there were quite a number) find their way back with a minimum of difficulty and red tape. He also attempted to work with the Reformed Episcopal Church, an previous breakaway from an earlier era over, actually, more substantive issues.

In a day of vitriol, harsh rhetoric, and demonizing those with whom one disagrees, I always found Ed Salmon someone with whom I could “disagree agreeably” and I never heard him demean or denigrate an opponent, even though he had a droll sense of humor and could more than hold his own in the debates in which we were often engaged in those days. Today’s morning psalm, to my mind, describes my friend and colleague about as well as could be done:

“O LORD, I am not proud; I have no haughty looks.

I do not occupy myself with great matters, or with things that are too hard for me.

But I still my soul and make it quiet, like a child upon its mother’s breast; my soul is quieted within me.

O Israel, wait upon the LORD, from this time forth, for evermore.” (Psalm 131)

Rest in peace, Ed. And rise in glory!

Supreme Court Defends Abortion Rights

June 28, 2016

I am pro life. And pro choice. That is not a hedge or the statement of some fence-sitting position on the issue of abortion, but the conclusion I reached many years ago after much soul searching and anguish. It is a position I have had to walk out in the circumstances of my own family so it is far more than a philosophical speculation divorced from reality.

I do not know when life begins. Neither does anyone else. Therefore, I believe it safest to opt for the earliest stage of development which is conception or at least implantation. Therefore, I believe that any abortion takes a life or at least a potential life. That is a grave decision indeed.

Nonetheless, the only person morally able and responsible for making that decision is the woman in whose body this precious organism resides. Hopefully, this woman will have the counsel and support of the father, her parents, doctor, clergy and friends to help her make, and live with, that decision. Sadly, many if not most, do not. Sometimes Planned Parenthood takes the place of such familial presence and, in my experience, they do a wonderful job. In the case of my teenage daughter no pressure for abortion was applied. And no abortion was performed. Instead, we were blessed by my beautiful first granddaughter!

Of one thing I am certain: it is not the government’s responsibility to insert itself into the life of a woman seeking to make such an anguished decision or to make that decision even more complicated. That is why I support the Supreme Court’s recent decision to strike down the state of Texas’ rules which threatened to reduce sharply the number of abortion clinics in that state.

Initially, the state’s argument that doctors performing abortions be required to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals in case something went wrong with the procedure and which also would have forced clinics to meet hospital-like standards for outpatient surgery seemed reasonable to me to protect women’s health (which is another reason I am pro life — I am pro-women’s-lives!). But I am persuaded by Justice Stephen Breyer’s majority opinion that the regulations are medically unnecessary.

He wrote, “the surgical-center equipment, like the admitting privileges requirement, provides few, if any, health benefits for women, poses a substantial obstacle to women seeking abortions and constitutes an ‘undue burden’ on their constitutional right to do so.” I am not completely happy with that opinion, but I am old enough to remember the tragedies of “back alley” abortions sought and received by desperate women before the days of Roe v Wade. If a woman decides to have an abortion, she will likely have one. The only question is whether or not it is safe and legal.

Let us cease the attempts to roll back a woman’s constitutional right to choose. Let us rather increase sex education, assure that safe contraception methods are easily available, support mental and emotional health care for all, guarantee equal pay for equal work for women, do away with the stigma of unplanned pregnancies and the misogynist assumption that such a pregnancy is “her fault” (as though there were no father involved!).

These, and other, measures will go a long way toward assuring that — as President Bill Clinton once said — abortions will be safe…legal…and rare.

Why Hillary Should Choose Julian Castro As V.P.

June 27, 2016

So, it looks like Hillary Rodham Clinton has likely narrowed her search for a Vice President to three — Elizabeth Warren, Tim Kaine, and Julian Castro. I would strongly encourage her to choose the latter. Here’s why:

I love Elizabeth Warren and she would be a great attack dog against Donald Trump. I’m not really worried about having two women on the ticket. But Warren is still a relative newcomer to politics, the Democrats can ill afford to lose her Democratic seat in the Senate, and she has little or no executive experience should the VP be forced to assume the mantle of the presidency. She has plenty of time to develop herself and her experience. Warren has an bright future in any case.

Tim Kaine (who by the way described himself as “boring” on MSNBC’s Meet the Press yesterday morning) is hardly a household name. He is the junior senator from Virginia (an important state which he could deliver on election night) and has executive experience as the 39th Lieutenant Governor and 70th Governor of that great State. However, once again, we can ill afford to lose a solid Democrat in the Senate plus, as another left-of-center Democrat, he will not bring anything new to the Clinton ticket.

On the other hand, Julian Castro certainly would! He is a young 41, attractive and charismatic, and currently serves in the Obama Cabinet as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. He has executive experience, having served as major of San Antonio. While he obviously has an Hispanic heritage, Castro’s Texas roots go back to 1920. He graduated from Stanford and has a law doctorate from Harvard. He is a Roman Catholic while Secretary Clinton is a devout Methodist.

Julian Castro would balance Hillary in almost every other conceivable way as well. He could deliver Texas and perhaps other Western states while she is strongest on the East coast. He is young; while she is not (same age as me…that makes her…old!). He would have overwhelming Latino support while Hillary will sweep the women and African Americans. Once the young Sanders’ supporters get to know him, they will appreciate his youth and energy as well as his ideas.

I would love to see a Clinton-Castro ticket and believe it would immediately serve to breathe some excitement into a campaign which desperately needs some at this point. Imagine having Julian serve as special trade ambassador to Latin America as Joe Biden has taken on special assignments in this Administration!

Oh, and Julian Castro has a twin brother (Joaquin) who currently serves in the U.S. House of Representatives. They could trade off when the travel schedule gets overwhelming!

 

 

 

 

 

The God You Don’t Believe In, I Probably Don’t Believe In Either!

June 25, 2016

One year while I was still working as Assisting Bishop in the Diocese of Chicago, Bishop Jeff Lee, invited congregations who felt they could to invite some “unchurched” folks to meet and have coffee with one of us bishops during our Sunday visitations. The idea was to hear from the actual people we are not reaching some of the reasons why? It’s easy for us church goers to “guess” at why our congregations are declining. It’s quite another to hear it straight from those who have either left our ranks or who have never been attracted to church in the first place.

Not every congregation took him up on the challenge, but quite a number did and we learned something interesting things. First of all, often non-church-goers have been hurt by the church in some way in their past. Maybe they grew up in a very judgmental, hellfire and brimstone kind of church and felt rejected.  Some are Roman Catholics who were refused communion after they re-married after divorce contrary to their church’s teaching.

Some have just drifted away because of the busy-ness and stressed out nature of their lives. They just don’t find the time for church, and some have been away so long they feel awkward now coming back. A number of folks just can’t get their heads around what they perceive to be the beliefs and doctrines of the church, and they say they’d feel like hypocrites standing in the midst of folks who seem to believe, say, the Nicene Creed when these people quite obviously don’t! And, again, they’re afraid they would be judged by us if their true beliefs, or lack of beliefs, were found out.

Of this number, some are just out and out atheists. They really don’t believe in God and wonder why some of the rest of us do. Well, we took great pains not to judge any of these good folks. They had honored us by even agreeing to come and have a conversation with us. And we weren’t there to convert them. We were there to learn from them. Privately though, I always wonder – of this last group, the self-professed “atheists” – just what kind of God they “don’t believe in!” In other contexts, I’ve often said to such people, “Tell me about the God you don’t believe in…because I probably don’t believe in that God either.”

I say this because, I think often people have rejected their childhood image of “an old man with a white beard who lives above sky” or the angry, judgmental God who delights in nothing more than casting unbelievers into the fires of hell for all eternity.   Some of these folks have never allowed their understanding of God to “grow up” right alongside the other areas of their knowledge which keep expanding with every year. No wonder they can’t square their Sunday school image of God with the post-modern world of the 21st century!

I ran across a beautiful quote from a friend of mine named Steven Charleston. Steven is a Native American of the Choctaw Tribe and lives in Oklahoma. But he is also a bishop of The Episcopal Church, has been a seminary professor and dean.. This is what he wrote:

The same power that set the sun aflame as though it were a candle, the same power that spun the Milky Way like a pinwheel, the same power that sprinkled the confetti stars across the distant heavens, that very power holds you safe under the shelter of its eternal care. The universe is not unconscious, creation is not unaware, all that was and is and ever will be resides in the mind and purpose of a presence beyond our comprehension or control. That presence is the source of life, of love, of intricate beauty and serenity sublime. That presence is with you today and will be with you forever. (June 17, 2015)

That’s the kind of expansive view of God I would just love the opportunity to introduce some of our unchurched friends to. Because I think our God is bigger than whatever truncated image they have felt it necessary to reject.  It’s the same God. But we must find ways to talk about the Holy One in language different from what our grandparents, our parents, and even many of us grew up with. I hope we can find ways to do that.

I hope we can find ways to do it before it’s too late, too late for the church…or at least the church as we experience it today.  At the very least, I hope you will listen to people you may know – people at work, in your neighborhood, people in your own family – who may be struggling to square the image of God they think we believe in with the world as they actually experience it.

Don’t judge them. Listen to them. And then, after you have listened long and deeply, maybe you can find a way to share with them – ever so gently that we welcome seekers in this church. Try to help them see that you don’t have to “have it all together” to be an Episcopalian. If you did, probably none of us would be here! The church, at its best, is a school of love; not a museum of saints. Hear again words describing the kind of God at least I hope you would be inviting them to encounter:

The same power that set the sun aflame as though it were a candle, the same power that spun the Milky Way like a pinwheel, the same power that sprinkled the confetti stars across the distant heavens, that very power holds you safe under the shelter of its eternal care. The universe is not unconscious, creation is not unaware, all that was and is and ever will be resides in the mind and purpose of a presence beyond our comprehension or control. That presence is the source of life, of love, of intricate beauty and serenity sublime. That presence is with you today and will be with you forever. (June 17, 2015)

 

 

 

Make Britain Great Again!

June 24, 2016

An astounding vote today has expressed the will of a majority of the English people to leave the European Union! I say the ‘English’ people rather than the ‘British’ people because both Scotland and Northern Ireland voted strongly to remain in the EU. The vote really should have been called ‘Englexit’ rather than ‘Brexit.’

Absolutely no one knows what this will mean. It will take up to two years to negotiate their way out of the 47 year old trade and immigration agreement. Already the British pound has fallen and world stock markets are in for a roller coaster day. David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, who bet his career on arguing for the UK to remain part of the EU, has resigned.

Some are calling this English “Independence Day” and, as an American, I can see the appeal of regaining a kind of national sovereignty and no longer having to jump through all the bureaucratic hoops Brussels (the EU headquarters) regularly puts them through. In fact, in my worst moments, I could actually be a Libertarian!

In the early stages of the American presidential campaign, I was actually quite drawn to Rand Paul. He was an attractive, articulate figure, an eye surgeon who did mission trips to Latin America. He spoke of a more isolationist foreign policy which would keep us out of wars. He advocated a simple, flat tax which would simplify all our lives. And he was far from the racist xenophobe so many other Republican candidates appeared to be.

But, the more I heard him, the more I realized that his brand of libertarian isolationism is actually contrary to everything I believe. The last thing we need in this world is to retreat behind our “safe, secure borders” and let the rest of the world go to hell. (As appealing as that can be on some days.) We need broader coalitions (like the EU) not narrow nationalism in the 21st century.

One of the scariest things about the Brexit vote is that it shows that a grass roots, populist message, fueled by racism, xenophobia, and perceived economic insecurity is present in virtually all Western democracies today. And they can win! As unlikely as it might appear, Donald Trump and his brand of blue-collar, white male populism could actually carry the day come November. If we are not very, very careful and do not work very, very hard for the alternative.

The Brexit decision flies in the face of a philosophy of global cooperation and internationalism that is our only way forward in the complexities of the post modern world. It flies in the face of this wonderful little poem by Edward Markham that I have returned to again and again when faced with decisions such as led well-meaning people in the UK to vote against their own self interests. It reads like this:

“He drew a circle that shut me out,

Heretic, rebel, a thing to flout.

But love and I had the wit to win,

We drew a circle that took him in!”

 

May we all continue to draw circles…not build walls!