Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

The Feminine Mistake?

February 16, 2016

One of the troubling subtexts in the Democratic presidential primary between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders is the subtle wedge being driven between older and younger women as they choose whom to support. Whether or not there is a “special place in hell” for those women who do not help other women, as Madeline Albright tried humorously to suggest, and whether or not there were indeed “sexist” comments made by members of Sanders’ staff, as Bill Clinton suggested, it is not helpful to pit women against one another in this contest.

In this scenario, however, younger women are said to be somewhat dismissive of older women’s likely support of Sec. Clinton because they do not relate to the struggles women of Hillary’s generation, or older, went through just to begin to be accepted and rewarded for their talents and hard work. A struggle younger women tend to overlook even though they are the inheritors of the success of those battles. Like their young male counterparts, these women are likely to be somewhat idealistic and moved by Bernie’s clear focus on income inequality and consistent integrity throughout his decades in Congress.

Older women remember the courage of then First Lady Clinton when she spoke out in Beijing with passion that “Women’s rights are human rights and human rights are women’s rights…once and for all.” Younger women may not even know where that sound bite, so often played these days in ads and on the stump, even came from! Older women who have been paying attention know that Hillary Clinton has been fighting for women and children since she was as young as some of Bernie Sanders’ female supporters are today.

My feminist wife, Susanne recently posted on Facebook that she is “still looking for that dialogue or article that stops pitting generations of women against each other.  As an old woman I lament that we still have so far to go.  Of course different things are more important to different generations, but I love and depend on my young sisters and pray that they too see something to respect about what we bring to the dialogue.”

All I can say is, Amen!

Constitutional Fundamentalists and Biblical Originalists

February 14, 2016

Appropriate condolences and expressions of appreciation for an influential and provocative Supreme Court Justice have been offered at the unexpected death of Antonin Scalia yesterday. That is most appropriate, as would be delay in the immediate politicization of the process of approving his replacement. Let us at least observe an appropriate period for the grieving of his large family and many friends before switching on the judicial sausage-making machine.

I would like to focus instead on the many descriptions of Justice Scalia as “brilliant” and as possessing “a keen intellect.” He is universally acknowledged as a constitutional “originalist,” a method of constitutional interpretation that looks to the meaning of words and concepts as they were understood by the Founding Fathers. In other words, rather than seeing the Constitution as a “living, breathing document” he believed that it must be interpreted exactly as the 18th century framers would have understood it.

That is, it seems to me, exactly what biblical fundamentalists argue when they advocate expounding the “plain sense” of the Bible without need for interpretation, contextualization, or an understanding of progressive revelation even within the text itself. And while such Bible teachers may know the Scriptures backwards and forwards, chapter and verse, and while they may be experts in the Hebrew and Greek languages in which the original documents were written, they would not qualify as biblical “scholars” in my opinion.

Rather, they too deny that the text they study (in this case, the Bible) is a living,breathing document but rather seek to interpret it as it was originally written by its ancient authors, with their “scientific” knowledge and primitive world views. Perhaps these Bible teachers should be called “biblical originalists.” And, in that case, Justice Scalia might best be described as a “constitutional fundamentalist.”

As an African American commentator said this morning, “If the Constitution was not a living, breathing document, I would still be a slave and only worth what someone would pay for me.”

 

A Matter Of Life And Death

February 13, 2016

“Twenty two.  That’s the number of times gunshots have rung out in Davenport since Jan. 1. In January alone, police responded to 19 shootings and shots-fired calls, nearly triple the number reported in January 2015.”  So began the lead article in today’s Quad City Times, the local newspaper serving the metro area of Davenport and Bettendorf, Iowa; Moline and Rock Island, Illinois.

Davenport itself is a city of approximately 100,000 nestled in that quad cities arrangement along the Mississippi River which brings the area number up closer to 400,000. But these twenty two shots were fired in Davenport alone. And even a cursory glance at the front page diagram showing where these incidents occurred reveal the overwhelming majority of them on the near west side of town, a predominantly African American community where gang life and the drug culture thrive.

A 65 year old resident of the area gives new neighbors his name and phone number so that they can call him in case of an emergency. He says he has the police department on speed dial so he can ring them up in a hurry, if needed. His next statement, however, speaks volumes:

“I’ve watched the neighborhood.  It goes in circles. As long as there are homeowners, the neighborhood is good. But when they start giving up homes and slumlords take over, everything goes downhill.”

And there, in the voice of experience, you have an eloquent statement of the complexity of the gun violence situation in this country. I bow to no one in my support of sensible gun laws which can keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have them. But, until we address the societal problems of income inequality and racism, we will not begin to approach a solution.

As long as young, Black men are treated as less than human, denied quality education and good jobs, they will consume and sell cheap narcotics to dull the pain, organized crime will move in to capitalize on this market, and some of the users will be sucked into becoming dealers because it is a quick way to get the dollars necessary to finance their habit. Vicious cycle does not begin to describe it.

So, when we hear our presidential candidates speak of their proposed solutions to poverty and violence, to job creation and educational reform, listen closely. These are not just stock phrases. They affect real, live human beings.

It is a matter of life and death.

We confess to you AND TO ONE ANOTHER

February 10, 2016

Most holy and merciful Father:  We confess to you and to one another, and to the whole communion of saints in heaven and on earth, that we have sinned by our own fault in thought word and deed; by what we have done, and by what we have left undone. (Page 267, The Book of Common Prayer)

So begins the “Litany of Penitence” Episcopalians use on this Ash Wednesday.  As much as I value the forty days of Lent as a season for prayer, fasting, and alms-giving, I must admit to increasing discomfort with our focus on begging for mercy from God, often seemingly groveling before the Holy One as “miserable sinners” not worthy to “gather up the crumbs under (God’s) table.”

Our sins don’t hurt God nearly as much as they hurt one another and ourselves. How much better if we said these words from our General Confession to each other, to the ones we have actually hurt and wronged by our thoughtless and selfish behavior:

“…I confess that I have sinned against you in thought, word, and deed, by what I have done, and by what I have left undone. I have not loved you with my whole heart; I have not loved my neighbor (either). I am truly sorry and I humbly repent. For the sake of…Jesus Christ…have mercy on me and forgive me…”

I think we need to spend a whole lot more time this Lent asking one another for forgiveness and seeking to amend our lives for those many ways we have sinned against one another. Including the broader, actually more important, categories than we usually confess, such as those included farther down in that same Litany of Penitence:

“…all our past unfaithfulness, the pride, hypocrisy and impatience of our lives…our self-indulgent appetites and ways, and our exploitation of other people…our anger at our own frustration, and our envy of those more fortunate than ourselves…our intemperate love of worldly goods and comforts, and our dishonesty in daily life and work…our waste and pollution of…creation, and our lack of concern for those who come after us.”

Yes, we have plenty of need for a season of “penitence and fasting.” Let’s just have the courage to confess our sins and ask forgiveness of the ones we have actually wounded —  one another.

 

A Tuesday That Is Really Fat

February 9, 2016

Every Shrove Tuesday I think of Bill Sanderson. He was a priest in a neighboring parish in Cocoa Beach, Florida and was in a clergy, lectionary-study group with me for six or seven years. We also played tennis together several days a week for some of those years.

I think of Bill on this day because he was something of an iconoclast and, on Shrove Tuesdays, Bill and his parish eschewed the usual “pancake supper” and held instead a steak and wine dinner. His point was, if we’re going to fast, let’s really fast and if we’re going to feast, let’s really feast.

The parish I attend now does something of the same thing. While sticking to the traditional pancake supper, they feature really good, live jazz music offered by the Manny Lopez trio, a local celebrity and his friends. The mood is entirely festive and an appropriate way to feast before the fast begins tomorrow on Ash Wednesday.

As Christians, I’m afraid we’ve really leveled out and tamed the annual cycles of feasting and fasting. Very few of us give up anything particularly significant for Lent beyond desserts or chocolate. And, with the possible exception of a few champagne receptions after the Easter Vigil, we don’t even celebrate together with much gusto.

All this is, I think, to our impoverishment. Of course, we don’t “have” to fast. We certainly should not do it to earn God’s favor or punish ourselves with some kind of penance. But, denying ourselves something, saying No to ourselves in small things can in fact strengthen our spiritual muscles so that we can say No when it is really important in life — No to cheating on our taxes…or on our spouses. No to drugs. No to revenge and violence.

Nor, I suppose, do we “have” to feast. Only if we want to celebrate the incredible gift of this fantastic universe and the beautiful “earth, our island home” on which we live. Only if we are grateful to have awakened this morning to another day of living and moving and having our being together as colleagues, friends, and lovers. Only if we recognize that none of this comes to us because we have earned it. But only because

God is good…all the time!  All the time…God is good!

And that calls for a Celebration.

What Does “Walking Together” Really Mean?

February 6, 2016

Much has been made in recent weeks about the Anglican Primates’ meeting and their decision to continue to “walk together” as a world communion despite disagreements, chiefly in the area of marriage equality. I join many in affirming that decision and yet, given the “consequences” suggesting that the Episcopal Church be excluded from sending representatives to certain global church forums, I wonder what “walking together” really means in this case.

In a recent press release from the Vatican headlined Pope extends new olive branch to China, “the pope explained that his view of dialogue is one in which neither side compromises or carves out its foothold, but both decide to ‘walk together’ respecting differences.'” The phrase “walk together” is obviously what captured my attention, but the fact that it is book-ended by “neither side compromises or carves out its foothold” and “respecting differences” is what is really important.

If the Bishop of Rome can foresee walking together with an officially atheistic nation, respecting the vast differences but not seeking to compromise or carve out its foothold, surely sisters and brothers in the Anglican Communion can find a way for its various Provinces to do the same.

Otherwise, what indeed does “walking together” really mean?

 

Biblical Leadership

February 3, 2016

As I read Psalm 72 this morning, I thought about how it is a really pretty good summary of what might be called “biblical leadership.” At least, these are the qualities the psalmist sought in the “ideal king.” In this political season, when so many are wearing their faith on their sleeves, perhaps this psalm might be a good reflection piece for us all:

(Verse) 1 Give the King your justice, O God, and your righteousness to the King’s Son — so what does justice and righteousness mean here? Read on:

2. That he may rule your people righteously and the poor with justice — so, “rulers” are to treat poor folks “rightly” and with justice.

3. That the mountains may bring prosperity to the people, and the little hills bring righteousness — assuring economic security and justice for all is part of the role.

4. He shall defend the needy among the people; he shall rescue the poor and crush the oppressor — sounds like “a preferential option for the poor” to me. Beware, oppressors!

7b. there shall be abundance of peace till the moon shall be no more — rulers are to be peacemakers.

9. His foes shall bow down before him, and his enemies lick the dust — yes, there is a “commander in chief” role here, in our broken world.

12. For he shall deliver the poor who cries out in distress, and the oppressed who has no helper. 13 He shall have pity on the lowly and poor; he shall preserve the lives of the needy. 14. He shall redeem their lives from oppression and violence, and dear shall their blood be in his sight — sounds like the ideal leader has compassion for those in the realm who are victims of violence and mourns every loss of life (maybe even with tears).

15. Long may he live! And may there be given to him gold from Arabia; may prayer be made for him always, and may they bless him all the day long — best wishes and adequate support must be given the ideal ruler. And it wouldn’t hurt to offer our prayers and blessing as well!

Interesting how much more attention is give to the leader’s concern and actions for the poor than to “national security.” Both are there. It’s just that justice is at the heart of the people’s security. Or, so it seems to me.

 

 

Ready for a Change?

February 2, 2016

“Well, the good thing is, we don’t have to hear about the ridiculous Iowa caucuses for another four years,” tweeted a (perhaps snobbish) Californian this morning. Well, I understand the rap on our caucus process — rural, “flyover” state, mostly white, only a relatively small percentage of folks turn out, etc, etc, etc.

But, if you stood in the midst of very average, but extremely knowledgeable people of all ages (and, believe it or not, colors) in church basements, elementary school libraries, community centers, and saw their passion — and yet patience — with the admittedly messy process, I don’t think you would call it “ridiculous.”

Not unless you want to ridicule good people who are trying to make our democracy work. Iowans don’t claim to have the last word in this, or any, political season. But, we do have the first. There are all kinds of other contests, big state and small, north and south, primary and caucus. It will all shake out in due course. But, for now, we have had our say. And, to a person, the candidates are grateful for the way they are treated and the seriousness with which Iowans take their politics.

As to this year, the only surprise for me was Rubio’s surge. Our conservative evangelicals were sure to pick Cruz. Trump still brings out angry, disillusioned people who apparently will vote against their own best interests. I would have thought a Kasich, or even Rand Paul surge more likely than Marco, but there you have it. Now, if he could only return to his optimistic vision, personal story, and show up occasionally for Senate votes, he might be a real contender.

I knew Bernie Sanders would do well with our “lefter-than-average” Democratic base, but was surprised how well he did. If only he really could lead a “revolution” and turn over both Houses, this country would be infinitely better off. Again, I think that’s unlikely and will continue to support to “pragmatic progressive,” Hillary Clinton. But, I’m going to keep my eye on Bernie.

Maybe this country really is ready for a change…for a change!

Fix The Debt

February 1, 2016

“In your first budget proposal in January 2017, what will you do to begin to address our national debt and deficit?” This is the question a national effort called “Fix the Debt” has challenged us to ask out candidates for President. Unfortunately, I have rarely heard it posed and never has it been adequately answered.

A few Republicans have plans to address Social Security and health care spending, but they also propose huge tax cuts that exceed their specific spending cuts and would worsen the fiscal situation. Some Democrats have proposals to pay for their large expansions of federal programs, but have not put forward plans to address the debt. It’s not enough to pay for new spending commitments when the accumulating debt is already unsustainable.

I am sorry that President Obama did not get behind the Bolles-Simpson debt and deficit reduction proposals and push hard to get them passed early in his first term. There would have been pain all around, but at least steps could have been taken to save our children and grandchildren from having to pay off the debt we have created!

Now, we have another chance. Whether Republican or Democrat, we must press our potential leaders to articulate just how they would raise taxes on the wealthiest among us AND make reasonable cuts in spending that do not hurt the poorest of the poor. There are ways to do this. It just takes the political will to do it.

It’s up to us to make sure that happens!

Local Paper Endorses Sanders and Kasich

January 31, 2016

Our local, Lee Enterprises owned, newspaper the Quad City Times this morning endorsed Bernie Sanders and John Kasich as their choice for the Democratic and Republican candidates for President. It’s not a great paper and I only read it because of the local coverage, but I think the choices are interesting. Here’s how they explain them:

“Americans are tired of the hollow rhetoric. They’re tired of two parties that, in a lot of ways, mirror each other. Any Democrat looking for a clear choice in the general election should caucus Monday for Bernie Sanders…If the Democratic Party is to move forward, it must abandon its compromised policy and differentiate itself come November. Only Sanders can accomplish that goal.”

“John Kasich is the poster-child for all thinking Republicans left behind by a party over-run by an irrational, seething fringe. The Ohio governor is the antithesis of the shrill, bigoted screaming heads dominating the Republican Party field. He should carry the GOP standard heading into November’s presidential election, if re-injecting reason into GOP rhetoric is of any concern.”

While I prefer Secretary Clinton over Senator Sanders as a Democrat, I certainly understand the appeal of Sanders’ consistent record, clear voice for income equality, and the need for a clear choice. I am also mindful of how many young people have been drawn into the process (as happened with Barack Obama) and how disappointed — perhaps even disillusioned — many of them will be if he does not win the nomination. I still think Hillary is the best prepared person in history to be President, but I absolutely get Bernie’s appeal.

I really hope the Times’ endorsement of John Kasic can move the needle a bit for him. Iowa has a long and laudable history of a kind of “progressive Republicanism” which has all but vanished in today’s GOP. Kasich is no Jim Leech or Maggie Tinsman (fine Iowa Republican legislators in Washington and Des Moines, respectively, in the recent past) but as the Times’ article points out, he is in many ways, “…a model Republican.He’s a thoughtful, pragmatic workhorse, who’s disinterested in mounting divisive social battles that reduce people to political fodder…(and is)…one of the few Republicans in the race who honestly believes in big-tent conservatism.”

Well, we’ll see. Tomorrow the first real “votes” in the nation will be cast here in the Iowa caucuses. Can’t wait to participate…and to see the results!