That We All May Be One

Wonderful day for ecumenism yesterday! The House of Bishops of the 76th General Convention of the Episcopal Churh passed “Finding Our Delight In The Lord,” a full communion proposal with the Northern and Southern Provinces of the Moravian Church. The House of Deputies now must rule on this.

This has been in the works for nearly a decade and builds both on local dialogue in North Carolina (where Moravians are strong) and theological dialogue on the national level. This 15th century “pre Reformation” reformed community is a liturgical church with a three-fold ministry, once described by the Church of England as “an ancient Protestant episcopal church.”

They are a gentle, spiritual people whose faith is as informed by their beautiful hymnody as ours is by the Prayer Book. They are missionally minded and ecumenically committed, already in full communion with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

There had been some opposition voiced, particularly by the way their bishops function (pastorally and sacramentally, but not much administratively) and by the fact that their transitional deacons can preside at the Eucharist (the dialogue team solved that one by deciding that, sadly, deacons will not be interchangeable under this agreement).

However, we must have been able to answer the objections because the House of Bishops passed it without a dissenting vote!

Earlier in the day, Moravian Bishop Hopeton Clennon of the Moravian Theological Seminary co-presided at the Eucharist with Bishop Steven Miller of Milwaukee (who is co-chair of the Moravian dialogue). This was done under the terms of our interim Eucharistic sharing arrangement with the Moravians on the way to full communion.

We have much to learn from each other and, yesterday, one small step was taking on the road to Christian unity.

Preliminary indications are that the House of Deputies at the General Convention will vote overwhelmingly to repeal B033, the resolution from the 2006 Convention asking bishops and standing committees to basically to withhold consent to the election of any bishop whose “manner of life” would prove divisive in the wider Anglican Communion.

This has been widely interpreted as applying mainly to gay and lesbian persons (although they are not specifically referenced) and therefore singling them out for unfair treatment. (The likely withholding of consent for Kevin Thew Forrester in the Diocese of Northern Michigan for other reasons challenges this notion, but nonetheless, it is widespread).

It will be interesting, eventually, to see if the House of Bishops will refuse to concur with the Deputies likely vote because, however many of us are sympathetic to the plight of gay and lesbian persons and the unfair burden they are being asked to carry, our role is all about unity — within the Communion and ecumenically — and this brings a different perspective.

There are diversities of gifts but the same Spirit in the Church…and in this Convention. We need all perspectives and the balance of the two Houses sometimes provides this.

We shall see.

Ah, the poor, naive Episcopal Church. We can’t even seem to get it right these days when we try to do the “right thing.” The media has rightly noted that there has always been a certain amount of movement back and forth between The Roman Catholic Church and churches of the Anglican Communion since the Reformation. What separates the case of Father Alberto, a media figure for the Roman Church was the way it was handled.

We have no problem with unchurched Roman Catholics (or other Christians) exploring The Episcopal Church and perhaps eventually choosing to join us. But precisely because of the similarities, as well as diff erences, between the two communions the process needs to be a slow and careful one lest the unsuspecting person wake up one day in a church he/she did not fully understand. The roots of Roman Catholicism go very deep and this is a spiritual question, not one of mere “church shopping” a la the American culture.

With Father Alberto’s notoriety it was perhaps impossible to keep this quiet (although I’m not convinced of that — confirmations/receptions can take place in the bishop’s chapel and, while not ideal from the point of Christian community, might have been advisable in this case). Certainly, the Roman Catholic bishop should have been advised by the priest and our own bishop and diocese well in advance. This is not only ecumenical protocol, but implied by our canons.

Certainly there is no necessity for this new Episcopal lay person to be given the privileges of an Episcopal pulpit on the Feast of Pentecost, undoubtedly provoking even more scrutiny and rubbing salt into the ecumenical wounds not only in Southeast Florida across the nation and world.

I am committed to Latino initiatives of The Episcopal Church, given the fact that it is the fastest growing demographic in the United States. And I do not believe that the Roman Catholic Church has some kind of “divine right” of access to the Latino community. But we must not run the risk of being accused of  “poaching” Roman Catholic lay persons or clerics. That is why I do not believe this situation has helped our Hispanic ministry, but perhaps even unintentionally damaged it.

No doubt the ecumenical firestorm will pass like so many others. I just hope that we will have learned something, and that the burns left behind will not leave painful scars only partially healed.

Here at the Church of the Brethren headquarters in Elgin, Illinois near Chicago, we have been challenged by our General Secretary, Dr. Michael Kinnamon, to consider ecumenism in “lean times.” The question before  us is ‘how will the churches respond when facing the economic challenges in which we are now engaged?’

“Lean times,” he pointed out in his opening address, “may be an opportunity to go beyond cooperation to a genuine sharing of resources, a sharing of life through an intentional deepening of relationships.  It could be an opportunity to take seriously the famously-ignored Lund Principle: ‘doing all things together except those which deep differences of conviction compel us to do separately.’

Or…lean times can reinforce the pull toward ecclesiastical introversion, which is always the greatest obstacle to manifesting unity.  If this is the course we take, then prepare for more tensions in our relationships as a result of internal pressure and competition borne of scarcity.”

Which path will we choose…ecumenically, or in the Anglican Communion?

Over 270 ecumenists gathered around that theme in Phoenix, Arizona, April 27-30 for the 2009 National Workshop on Christian Unity. Often described as a “network of networks,” the NWCU combines business meetings of the various communions’ local ecumenical officers with keynote speakers, seminars, and lively worship.

Former Stated Clerk of the Presbyterian Church USA and current President of the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, Dr. Clifton Kirkpatrick, preached at the Opening Worship in St. Mary’s Roman Catholic Basilica. He emphasized that, while many experience the ecumenical movement as in a “desert time” in these days, renewal and new life has come precisely in the desert for God’s people. The opening worship was an interesting blend of traditions including choirs from both the Orthodox and African Methodist Episcopal churches, a Mariachi band and hymns sung in Spanish, and energetic praise from a Sudanese Episcopal Church choir.

The keynote address was delivered by Metropolitan Gerasimos of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of San Francisco. His Eminence stressed both the challenges and the hopes of Orthodox involvement in the ecumenical movement. Acknowledging that there are “anti ecumenical” voices in all our communions, he counseled the patient listening of the Desert Fathers as a model to follow. Recognizing the great strides made recently between Eastern and Oriental Orthodox churches around issues of Christology, he suggested prioritizing those communions with whom we share the greatest similarity and history as places to start in ecumenical engagement.   

Morning Bible studies were conducted by Dr. Margaret Mitchell, a Roman Catholic professor of New Testament and Early Christian Literature at the University of Chicago Divinity School. Her rich presentations on the various images of unity used by St. Paul in his First Letter to the Corinthians showed how he drew upon ancient Greek and Roman models familiar to his original readers.

Seminars included “Ecumenical Implications of Post-Modern Thought” presented by the Very Rev. Nick Knisely, dean of Trinity Episcopal Cathedral, Phoenix; “Common Words Among Christian and Muslims” presented by Dr. Lucinda Mosher of Religions for Peace – USA; a panel from the historic Black Methodist churches discussing “Racism as an Impediment to Ecumenism;” and a discussion based on the World Council of Churches’ document “Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry” by Dr. Louis Weil of the Church Divinity School of the Pacific; among many others.

The lively closing luncheon speech was given by Dr. Cecil “Mel” Robeck, Jr., professor of Church History and Ecumenics and Director of the David J. DuPlessis Center for Christian Spirituality at the Fuller Theological Seminary. As a Pentecostal ecumenist, Dr. Robeck was able to trace the increasing involvement of Pentecostals in the movement toward church unity in recent decades ranging from their contributions to Faith and Order discussions to the worldwide Global Forum.   

Various ecumenical officer networks from the Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Episcopal and other churches held business meetings in conjunction with the NWCU. The National Ecumenical Officers Association welcomes a new such network, the United Methodist Ecumenical and Interreligious Trainers (UMEIT). Next years National Workshop on Christian Unity will be held in Tampa, Florida April 19-22, 2010.