Archive for the ‘Emergent Church’ Category

“Open” Communion?

January 31, 2009

It was good to hear the keynote speaker — Dr. Louis Weil — at this year’s “Epiphany West” conference come out strongly against so-called “open communion” (communion of the un-baptized). That was especially courageous here in California where the practice is becoming widespread.

Cautioning against “playing God at the altar rail” (meaning that he would never turn anyone away from communion), Dr. Weil nonetheless  believes that this practice trivializes baptism and wonders why, after all the years reclaiming its centrality, we would now want to make it virtually optional.

The theme of this conference has been “Baptismal Water: Thicker Than Blood” and we have looked at baptism through a variety of lenses — liturgical, ecumenical, and missional. Dr. Weil, of course, has taught generations of clergy and laity about the important rediscovery of a baptismal ecclesiology, the recovery of the Easter Vigil, and the use of the rich symbols in our liturgical life.

I am in absolute agreement with Louis Weil here. I am familiar with the “open table” of Jesus argument — that he ate with outcasts and sinners and never turned anyone away, etc. However, I am unpersuaded that this is the same thing as the Eucharist and would encourage congregations really to invite the poor into their homes and parish halls for meals rather than believe that they have  actually exercized hospitality by inviting the unbaptized to communion.

Certainly, it is an ecumenical nightmare. An Orthodox priest friend of mine wandered into an Episcopal Church inviting “all who are hungry for God” to receive the sacrament and later told me, “If you think Gene Robinson is a problem, that is nothing compared to this from our perspective!”

The point being, we have ecumenical covenants and commitments that we have made over the last forty or fifty years which are predicated on our commitment to certain basic sacramental practices. When these practices involve the most basic sacrament which unites all Christians together, regardless of our other differences, surely we run the risk of being considered unreliable ecumenical partners when we make these changes with virtually no theological conversation among ourselves and certainly none with our ecumenical partners.

And, of course, any priest who formally and publically invites the un-baptized to Holy Communion is in direct violation of canon law and subject to discipline for that.

But, hey, who cares about that, right?

Common Mission: What Is It, Really?

January 28, 2009

 

Tom Ferguson and I are here in Berkeley CA presenting at CDSP’s “Epiphany West” Conference –Baptismal Water: Thicker Than Blood. It has a real ecumenical theme. I am presenting on the WCC document “Nature and Mission of the Church.”

 

But Tom and Jon Perez, a member of our Lutheran Episcopal Coordinating Committee and pastor of Epiphany Lutheran and Episcopal congregation in Marina, California did a major piece called “Common Mission: What is it, Really?”

 

If you, like me, sometimes wonder about that, go to Epiphany’s web site

 

www.epiphanymarina.org

 

and see what one fine congregation is doing. Even better, click on their “Called To Common Mission” link and find a list, and contact information, for many, many such examples of common mission!

 

It is gratifying for our work to take a look!

Baptismal Water: Thicker Than Blood

January 25, 2009

As a fitting conclusion to this year’s Week of Prayer for Christian Unity (did you observe it in any way?!) I head off tomorrow to participate in the Church Divinity School of the Pacific’s “Epiphany West Conference — Baptismal Water: Thicker Than Blood.”

I’ll be teaching a class on the World Council of Church’s nascent text “Nature and Mission of the Church” (touted to be a successor to “Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry”) and my Associate Tom Ferguson will join with a member of our Lutheran-Episcopal Coordinating Committee, Jon Perez, to explore “Common Mission: what does it really mean?”

Led by Louis Weil, this conference aims to bring together a number of areas which have been central to my life and ministry over the years — liturgy, the ministry of the baptized, and ecumenism. Often these areas appear to be separate and people engaged in one are not necessarily involved in the other two.

I think that is a great mistake. Liturgical renewal, ministry development, and the search for church unity are all streams leading into one great river. It is no accident that the renewal of our church’s worship (best seen in our still-yet-to-be-rivaled 1979 Prayer Book with its centrality in the Baptismal Covenant) led pretty directly to the renewal of the diaconate and what we used to call “lay” ministry.

And we are not engaged in this journey alone — sisters and brothers in other Christian communions are making the same discoveries. And they are bringing us together!   

Not sure how much time I’ll have for blogging over this next week. I don’t want to miss anything! But I will try to post any insights I receive as soon as I can.

MARY’S SONG

December 24, 2008

Last Sunday as we celebrated the Fourth Sunday in Advent, the Lessons focused on Mary and her pivotal role in the incarnation of God’s Son which we’ll be celebrating at Christmastime. Our First Lesson tells of God’s promise to David to raise up descendents for him so that his kingdom, his “throne,” will endure for ever.

 

And the Gospel is the story of the Annunciation, the angel Gabriel’s announcement to Mary that she would indeed be the Mother of God’s Messiah, a descendent of that very same King David. These stories set us up for the final days’ countdown to the Feast of the Nativity – or Christmas…the Christ Mass we celebrate on Thursday.

 

But I found my attention being drawn again and again this week to the canticle suggested for today – Mary’s Song, or the Magnificat, which comes in Luke’s Gospel soon after the Annunciation. We often say that the Lord’s Prayer is the perfect prayer, or the perfect outline for prayer…and so it is. But, in my opinion, Mary’s Song runs a pretty close second, which is one reason we use it as a canticle nearly every day at Evening Prayer. So I just want to reflect on it a bit with you this afternoon:

 

It begins: “My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord; my spirit rejoices in God my Savior; for he has looked with favor on his lowly servant.” Mary’s first response after hearing the good news from the angel and having it confirmed in her visit to Elizabeth was to praise God! She rejoices in God because she has been looked upon with “favor,” with “grace” by that same God. And that recognition simply draws praise from her!

 

She goes on to acknowledge: “From this day all generations will call me blessed: the Almighty has done great things for me, and holy is his name.” She has a sense that this unique role she’s been called to will single her out, and that the momentous event she’s about to become part of will make her special…that people will look to her in a special way. Yet, she always points back to God – the Almighty has done great things for me and holy is his Name! It’s all about God for Mary.

 

And that God, she goes on to say, “…has mercy on those who fear him in every generation.” God’s essential and eternal nature is one of mercy. Indeed the whole reason for the Incarnation, for God’s saving act about to be begun in Jesus Christ is because of Gods’ mercy. God’s Son will be sent out of his great mercy toward humankind and as a remedy for the plight we are in, requiring such a savior.

 

Yet, this mercy does not make God somehow weak. “He has shown the strength of his arm, he has scattered the proud in their conceit,” Mary sings, “He has cast down the mighty from their thrones, and has lifted up the lowly. He has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent away empty.” You see, God’s mercy also entails judgment.

 

Those too conceited and proud to acknowledge God will be scattered one day. The mighty ones of the Empire who stand on the backs of the lowly will be cast down one day. Those whose bellies are empty now will be fed one day, but the tycoons and the fat cats who were too busy to pay attention to the hungry will find themselves “empty” one day.

 

Why is all this happening? Mary concludes that it is because of God’s faithfulness. “He has come to the help of his servant Israel, for he has remembered his promise of mercy, the promise he made to our fathers, to Abraham and his children for ever.”

 

Even the judgment of God is related to mercy and to faithfulness. The Lord promised Abraham in the 12th Chapter of Genesis that he would bless those who blessed him and curse those who cursed him, that from him would come a great family, and that in him all the families of the earth would be blessed.

 

God continued that promise down through the patriarchs and the prophets, down through the family of David, and now – in a special way – to great David’s greater son: Jesus, the Christ!

 

So, let’s look at the pattern of Mary’s wonderful song and see what kind of outline it can provide for our own prayers. It begins with praise; it continues with gratitude; it acknowledges the reality of sin and the necessity of judgment; and concludes with an assurance of God’s faithfulness down through the centuries, a faithfulness we can rely on in our lives as well.

 

Our prayers should always be offered in the context of praise. If we know God and realize all that God has done for us, when we come into that Holy Presence (as our Prayer Book Catechism puts it) “God’s Being draws praise from us.” Mary said “My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord.” I often begin my prayers with words like these from another great canticle, the Te Deum: “I praise you, O God, I acknowledge you to be the Lord; all the earth worships you, the Father everlasting!”

 

And then, of course, we express our gratitude, our thankfulness for our “creation, our preservation from harm, and for all the blessings of this life.” Everything we have comes from God! We would not open our eyes in the morning or indeed draw the next breath were it not for God’s sustaining hand. And the whole motivation for our “good works” and for living holy lives is in thanksgiving for God’s grace and love.

 

But we often squander that love. And that’s why some time in our prayers needs to be devoted to contrition and confession – being sorry for our sins…and naming them. We name them more for ourselves than God (for God already knows them!)…but we identify them so that we can work on them with the help of the Holy Spirit within us.

 

And while our petty little personal sins are problems and we need to tend to them, look at the kind of sins about which Mary is concerned: pride and conceit; power and privilege; injustice toward the poor and the hungry. Let’s confess our complicity in those sins as well!

 

But we won’t end our prayers there! We’ll conclude with another kind of gratitude. With being thankful that, even when we are unfaithful, God is not! God created and sustains this Universe by a word of power. God raised up patriarchs and matriarchs, prophets and martyrs. God sent Jesus to redeem us from sin and death, and the Holy Spirit to gather the Church and sanctify her members. We can rely on that faithfulness even as did Abraham and Sarah, Moses and Joshua, Isaiah and Deborah, Peter, Paul…and yes, even our Lord’s Mother, Mary of Nazareth!

 

As we prepare to celebrate Christmas, let’s remember the role she played in this whole salvation history. We don’t worship Mary…but surely we honor her. May her prayer be ours this Christmas:

 

For, in Christ, (God) has helped his servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy, according to the promise he made to our ancestors, to Abraham and to his descendents for ever.”

 

And that, praise God, includes you…and me! 

       

Amazing Grace

December 8, 2008

We concluded our Inter Anglican Standing Commission on Ecumenical Relations here in Kyoto, Japan last evening with a Eucharist presided over by our Japanese member, Fr. Renta, at St. Agnes’ Cathedral of the Nippon Sei Ko Kei (the Anglican Church in Japan).

He told us if was the first time he had celebrated the Eucharist in English, but one would never have known that by the lovely way he presided. He also preached a moving homily on the parable of the Good Samaritan. He reflected on just how differently the “man who fell among thieves” might have lived his own life after being rescued by the Samaritan…and how perhaps he too became a minster of compassion, having been the recipient of such grace from a stranger.

To illustrate this dynamic, he told the story of a young Japanese man who had dropped out of middle school and generally made all the wrong choices as a young man. He was so depressed and ashamed of himself that he attempted to commit suicide by drenching himself with gasoline and preparing to strike a match.

However, his estranged father intervened, threw his arms around him, and also became covered with the flammable gasoline. “Go ahead and light the fire, my son,” the father shouted, “but I will never let you go!”

Unable to take his father with him into death, the young man dissolved into tears and, subsequently, began to lead a new life, eventually becoming a person of real notoriety and respect in the community. Renta said that it was because, for the first time, he knew he was loved by his father!

What a modern day parable of the Good Samaritan! What an anticipation of the Christmas miracle as God embraces us, even in the midst of our sin, and to the point of death, to show us how much we are loved.

May our lives too be transformed by an awareness of and appreciation of this amazing grace!

Three “Happy Trees”

December 1, 2008

Susanne and I are in Kyoto, Japan for the last meeting of the Inter Anglican Standing Commission on Ecumenical Relations. The last because this commission has been rolled together with the doctrinal one due to budget constraints in the Anglican Communion and, ostensibly, because the line between ecumenical and inter-Anglican relations has become increasingly blurred in recent years and the thought is, one group should attend to both.

I’m not sure this is a good idea because there is so much going on ecumenically around the world that I think we need a discreet body to meet annually and serve as a clearing-house and think-tank so that our ecumenical work has some consistency and cogency around the Communion. For example, are we saying the same thing to Methodists in the US as the Church of England is saying to British Methodists in ecumenical agreements? Perhaps the new group can do this, but I wonder if the work load will just be too heavy and scattered.

Today we were able to to tour Nara (not far from Kyoto) and visit a Buddhist temple (the largest wooden structure in the world) and a Shinto shrine the grounds of which were covered by over 1,000 tame deer (preserved because they are seen as sacred in their ancient mythology). The peace and serenity of these holy places was palpable, even with hundreds of tourists and pilgrims walking about.

My favorite learning was that the three primary types of trees in Japan have symbolic meaning. The pine represents “long life and eternal youth” because of its ever-green nature. The bamboo represents “honesty” because it stand tall and straight. The plum tree represents “courage” because it is fruitful even in winter. They are called the “three happy trees” of this land!

May we find our happiness in such virtues as long life, honesty, and courage!

Ecumenical “New Fire”

November 12, 2008

Here in Denver for the annual General Assembly of the National Council of Churches. It is really encouraging to witness the turn around this ecumenical entity has experienced since the election last year of Dr. Michael Kinnamon as General Secretary. This long-time ecumenist, World Council of Churches’ staff person, seminary dean and professor has restored dignity and substance to this once-mighty expression of the unity of the Church here in the United States.

Among other things he has raised issues of “Faith and Order” and “Interfaith Relations” to be on a par with “Social Justice” issues as the main work of the Council. For those who once saw the NCC as a glorified social service organization, this should be good news indeed. The Episcopal Church has one of the youngest and most diverse delegations at the Assembly. 

A very exciting development was the “New Fire” Conference for young ecumenists which preceded the Assembly.  We sent two exceptional young adults to the conference which totalled some 40 such persons. They learned something of the history of the ecumenical movement, shared their own experiences, and have challenged us to unify and support the various expessions of an ecumenical youth witness such as the World Christian Student Federation, the US Conference of the World Council of Churches’ initiative, the Young Adult Ecumenical Form, and the NCC’s own work in this area.

They were energized and truly “on fire” for the unity of Christ’s Church…and they have inspired us as well. This bodes well for the future, and present, of the ecumenical movement!

Christo-Centric Ecumenism

November 4, 2008

We are privileged at this Eucharist today to welcome some sisters and brothers from other member churches of the National Council of Churches. They are here to participate in what we are calling “church to church” visits and we’ve had a good morning together already.

 

The point of these visits is to underscore the fact that the National Council of Churches is not some external “organization” which we are supporting. The National Council is “us!” The NCC is the relationship we have, as Episcopalians with some 45 million US Christians in 100,000 local congregations – Protestant, Orthodox, Evangelical, the historic African American churches, and the Living Peace churches. These are our sisters and brothers in service to the Gospel right here in this land…and beyond.

 

And I thought how appropriate particularly our first reading was today from Ephesians (5:1-8). The second verse is one easily remembered by Episcopalians because it is often used as the offertory sentence at the Sunday Eucharist: “Walk in love as Christ loved us and gave himself for us, an offering and sacrifice to God.” And that verse is preceded by the reason we are to “walk in love” – “therefore be imitators of God as beloved children!”

 

Because God is love, we who are created in God’s image are to be people of love. That’s why our lives are to manifest holiness (as outlined in the next verses – avoiding sexual sin, greed, coarse speech and all the rest of it). Because these are not really loving things to do! Rather, as in verse 8, now that we have seen the light of the Lord, we ourselves are to be children of light.

 

We don’t often think of ecumenism as being rooted and grounded in love, but of course that is precisely the point. We seek unity with our brother and sister Christians because we love the same God, are commanded by our common Savior and Lord to love one another, and to work together to share that love with the whole world! The National Council of Churches does that by fostering dialogue and theological reflection as well as by common action for justice and peace, classically called Faith and Order…Life and Work.

 

There’s one more reason today’s Epistle is so appropriate. When the author writes:  “Be imitators of God as beloved children,” that’s right in line with what is sometimes called  “Christo-centric” or “Christological” ecumenism. That is, the closer we draw to Christ, the closer we will draw to one another. That’s why “spiritual ecumenism”…praying together…is so important.

 

So, I can’t think of anything more appropriate than worshipping together in this Holy Eucharist today. Not all the NCC member denominations are in full communion yet. But we are on the way. And our special intention at this Eucharist should be that we will never tire on that journey, but together “Walk in love as Christ loved us and gave himself for us, an offering and sacrifice to God.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Irreconcilable Differences?

October 25, 2008

At the recent meeting of The Episcopal Church’s Executive Council in Helena, Montana, the theme of “reconciliation” was much in evidence. Work continues on the Council’s formal response to the St. Andrew’s Draft of a possible Anglican Covenant which the Archbishop of Canterbury believes is the best chance we have for deeper reconciliation across the Anglican Communion.

The Executive Council re-committed its time, talent, and treasure to assist loyal members of the Episcopal dioceses of San Joachin and Pittsburgh in rebuilding those dioceses now that significant numbers of ordained and lay leaders have left The Episcopal Church for an overseas diocese and Province. And there was also a proposal to enter into serious conversation (without “preconditions”) with the “Common Cause” partnership of disaffected Episcopalians in this country to see what can be done in cooperation and common mission in the future.

“Irreconcilable differences” are often cited as reasons for folks leaving The Episcopal Church (or a troublede marriage!) these days. “That is a deeply un-Christian concept,” Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold once said and our current Presiding Bishop agrees. “Reconciliation is the foundation of our participation in God’s mission,” Bishop Katharine declared.

For Christians, there are no “irreconcilable differences!”

The True Via Media

October 12, 2008

I have often said that having a lively sense of church history can make living through turbulent times in the church today a bit more bearable, or at least put things in perspective. Lately,  I’ve been re-reading Secor’s biography of Richard Hooker who, along with Thomas Cranmer, could rightly be said to be one of the main “prophets” of Anglicanism.

It is from Hooker and his “Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity” that many scholars derive the famous “three legged stool” of scripture, tradition, and reason as quintessenitally Anglican methods for discerning God’s will in the midst of the complexities of life.  But it is his moderation and tolerance for those who differed, both on the “catholic right” and “puritan left” (or the “catholic left” and the “puritan right!”) of which I  have been reminded in taking another look at Secor’s book.

Also the vitriolic Reformation climate which led to accusation and counter accusation, verbal (and sometimes physical) assaults, ex-communication, deposition, and legal wrangling in the courts. Sound familiar?

I don’t go as far as my friend Professor Robert Wright who calls the Reformation “the Great Mistake.” In fact I believe it was a tragic necessity, given the unwillingness of the Church of Rome to reform and renew itself from within.  It was a tragedy, but a necessary tragedy and it has taken four hundred years for the Roman Church to begin to embrace some of the Gospel-based reforms pointed out by Luther, Calvin, and others.

We may well be living through such times again today. And, like in Reformation times, it is often difficult to see who is “on the side of the angels” in the current debates. Let us take a page out of Hooker’s book(s) and strive always to care for and understand our adversaries, knowing that only time and God’s ultimate judgment will sort some of this stuff out.

In the meantime, let us pray for “Hookerian” tolerance and moderation. And the true “via media.”