“The Real Anglican Orthodoxy”

June 10, 2011

Having recently participated in a diocesan discussion on the proposed Anglican Covenant, I continue to come away with two distinct impressions: 1) Episcopalians are deeply committed to the Anglican Communion and mindful of the common heritage, ethos, and missional opportunities we share with the other Provinces of the Communion, but 2) Episcopalians are deeply suspicious of the proposed Covenant, fearing that it changes us (and not for the best) from a autonomous but interconnected family of “national” (read “provincial”) churches into a “global” church similar to the Church of Rome.

This has been said before, but I am increasingly convinced of it: we are much more like the international family of Orthodox churches. Regularly we hear that the three largest Christian bodies in the world are: the Roman Catholic Church, the Orthodox, and the Anglicans (followed closely by the Lutheran World Federation) . And, while the Roman Church is certainly structurally (if not always functionally) “one church,” the Orthodox (and Lutherans) certainly are not.

Besides the major theological differences still impairing communion between the Eastern and so-called “Oriental” Orthodox churches, there are stresses and strains between the sometimes fiercely nationalistic churches of the East as well. Certainly, the Orthodox share a basic, underlying theology, but there are subtle and not-so-subtle differences which keep them from even attempting, or wanting, to be a “global church” in the way that the Roman Catholic Church is.

Yet, no one doubts that there is a recognizable “Orthodox” family of churches which, like us, share “a common heritage, ethos, and missional opportunities” together. My sense is that, no matter which way the Anglican Covenant goes — whether 51% of the Provinces sign on and 49% do not, whether a “two tiered” system develops in the Communion or not — there will always be a recognizable Anglican family of Provincial churches, a family which the world will recognize…even if we sometimes do not! 

And that, it seems to me, is good news.

 

An Anglican Response to the Rob Bell Controversy

May 23, 2011

I don’t know how many of you may have seen news reports of the latest flap circulating in evangelical circles these days. Now, I don’t mean the obvious fact that Jesus did not return in glory yesterday – no mature Christian, Catholic or Protestant takes these kinds of “predictions” seriously.

No, this has to do with a new book written by Rob Bell, the young pastor of a huge mega-church in Grandville, Michigan, called the “Mars Hill Bible Church.” Rob is the founder and producer of the “Nooma” film series we have been using for the last several years as part of our Adult Education offerings on some Sunday mornings.

His new book is entitled “Love Wins: A Book about Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived.” Not a very modest title, which may be one reason that the book has caused such an uproar in some circles. He has been accused by some of denying the existence of hell and of being a “Universalist” – that is, one who believes that everyone will eventually make it to heaven. He has denied both accusations and staunchly defends his book as not denying the reality of hell, but questioning some of his fellow-evangelicals’ certainty that they know just exactly who is going to hell and who is not!

In one exchange, he argues with a fellow pastor who claimed that Gandhi was certainly in hell. Rob replied, “Gandhi in hell? Really? We have confirmation of this? Without a doubt?”

Of course, those who claim that only Christians —  or even only born-again Christians – will make it into heaven often quote the very passage we have from John’s Gospel this morning: in response to Thomas’ question about how they can know “the way” to where Jesus is going, he replies, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)

The first part of that citation is Jesus’ primary point and he goes on in the rest of our Reading today to elaborate on what it means to say that he is the way, the truth, and the life. Jesus is the way to God because, as he says, “Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, “Show us the Father?” (John 14:9)

The point here is that the fact of the Incarnation means that Jesus is the “human face of God.” God is really quite beyond anything we can touch or feel or see or even comprehend fully. But the Christian claim is that all we NEED to know about God can be discovered in Jesus. When we look at Jesus, we know what God is like! Does that exhaust everything about the nature of God? Probably not. But, again, all we NEED to know about God, we believe we have found in Jesus Christ. He is “the way” for us.

Next, we are told that Jesus is “the Truth.” And John’s Gospel goes on to quote him as saying “The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own; but the Father who dwells in me does his works.” (John 14:10) So, when Jesus teaches, he is not just teaching on his own, he is conveying “the truths” he learned from his Father.”  Jesus is speaking the truth about God because God is speaking though him.

And finally, we hear that Jesus is “the Life.” Well, I don’t know anyone – Christian or non-Christian – who does not believe that Jesus lived an exemplary life and that if more people lived more like Jesus, this would be a considerably finer world. Or, as Jesus puts it in today’s Gospel, “Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; but if you do not, then believe me because of the works themselves. Very truly I tell you, the one who believes in me will also do the works that I do…” (John 14:11-12) We are to live life like Jesus!

So, we believe that Jesus shows us the way to God…teaches us the truth about God…and exemplifies for us the kind of life God would have us live. He is, therefore, the way…the truth…and the life! But does that mean that only Christians will get to heaven? And, if so, what kind of Christians? Practicing Christians? What about non-practicing Christians?

Catholic Christians? What about Protestant Christians? Conservative Christians? What about Liberal Christians?

Yet, John’s Gospel does quote Jesus as saying: “No one comes to the Father except through me.” What does he mean by that? Well, Peter Marty (our colleague up the street at St. Paul Lutheran) puts it this way in a recent review of Rob Bell’s book in The Christian Century magazine: “the glue holding Bell’s project together is the firm conviction that Jesus is bigger than any one religion. He is the cosmic Christ who will not be co-opted or owned by any one culture. He is supra-cultural.”

“The apostle Paul wrote, ‘In Jesus, God was reconciling the world to himself’ and Bell is not willing to say that what Paul really meant was a reconciliation of the Christian world. Similarly Bell thinks that when Jesus announced that “God so loved the world…’ he actually meant the world. Had John been interested in shrinking the gospel or lessening the scope of the cross, he might well have proposed that ‘God so loved only Christians.’ But John did not.” (May 17 Christian Century, page 25)

No, John did not propose that…but sometimes Christians seem to wish that he had! Some of this debate is new to evangelical Christians, and that’s why Rob Bell has been so roundly criticized by some of his fellows. It’s not a new debate to Catholic, Orthodox, or Anglican theologians. Roman Catholics believe in Purgatory which may allow a way for former unbelievers yet to be recipients of the gift of heaven.

Orthodox and Anglicans often speak of an “intermediate state” called Paradise where we will continue to grow in grace after death while we await the final judgment, and where those who have never heard the word of Christ or who have had it so poorly presented that they rejected it, likewise may have the opportunity to be introduced to Jesus and walk through that “door of the sheepfold” into eternal life with God.

I remember my professor of systematic theology at Seabury-Western once saying “We absolutely must posit the existence of hell…because God will not force anyone to spend eternity with Him who doesn’t want to. BUT,” he continued with a smile, “ if you and I do our jobs, it is not necessary to posit that anyone will actually end up there…finally!”

Well, to be honest, I expect there actually will be those who choose to turn their backs on God once and for all. There are some people who seem actually that self-centered. But let us not join those who criticize people like Rob Bell who at least hold out the hope that, in the final analysis, Love does indeed “win.”

And that those who – knowingly or unknowingly – follow the way, the truth, and the life of Jesus will one day see him face-to-face and (like us) will receive the Gift that neither they, nor we, deserve.

The Gift of Eternal Life!

After Baptism…then what?

May 9, 2011

Easter 3A – Community of Celebration.

As former ecumenical officer for The Episcopal Church, I am a great supporter of our having adopted the Revised Common Lectionary. That’s the scheme which selects and organizes the Lessons from Scripture we read every week. We now share this Lectionary with the Church of England, the Lutherans, Methodists, Presbyterians and others.

Churches like ours which follow a set Lectionary have a great advantage, it seems to me, in that we cover large portions of the Bible each year and it is not up to the preacher to pick and choose which Scripture he or she will preach about each week.

Rather, we have to start with the Word of God, start with the selections provided for us, and then say our prayers, do our commentary work, pay attention to the world around us and the parish we serve, and allow the sermon to be framed out of the interaction of all those factors. So I appreciate the work of those who developed the Lectionary we use.

Having said that, I am at something of a loss to understand why they stopped at what I believe to be one verse short in our First Reading from Acts this afternoon! We come in at the tale end of Peter’s great Pentecost sermon, the very first Apostolic sermon preached after the pouring out of God’s Holy Spirit upon the Church, that event which transformed that ragtag bunch of disciples from a fearful, if excited, new Community which had just experienced the Risen Christ, into the most formidable band of missionaries and evangelists the world had ever known!

Peter begins with the Old Testament prophecies, rehearses the story of Jesus’ life and death and resurrection and how that ties into those ancient prophecies, and concludes with this powerful line: “Let the entire house of Israel know with certainty that God has made him both Lord and Messiah, this Jesus whom you crucified!” (Acts 2:14).

Well, that got their attention and the text says that:  “when they heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and to the other apostles, “Brothers, what should we do?” Peter tells them that they must “repent” (must turn around and go in a new direction – must now follow the One they had betrayed, or at least deserted) and be baptized so that their sins might be forgiven and so that they might receive that same Pentecostal gift of the Holy Spirit. We’re then told that his hearers welcomed that message and were baptized – some 3,000 persons on that very day! Pretty impressive!

And I suppose that, if all we were interested in was “church growth,” creating “mega churches,” and putting (as it is sometimes indelicately stated) “more butts in the pews,” that might be a good place to stop the First Lesson for today. But look what the next verse says, the verse that was “left out” for some strange reason: “…that day about three thousand persons were added. THEY DEVOTED THEMSELVES TO THE APOSTLES’ TEACHING AND FELLOWSHIP, TO THE BREAKING OF THE BREAD AND THE PRAYERS! (Acts 2:42)

Beloved, coming to faith in Jesus Christ and being baptized into his fellowship is just the first step in a life of Christian discipleship! In some ways, that’s the easy part. Then comes the life of discipleship! Then comes the day to day, week to week, year after year after year JOURNEY INTO CHRIST! And Luke describes that journey, in the Book of Acts, as having at least four components:

The first is being devoted to the Apostles Teaching. Those early Christians were going to have to devote themselves to sitting at the Apostles’ feet, week after week, just as the Apostles had sat at Jesus’ feet week after week, and be instructed in how to live the Christian life!

At the very least that was going to entail learning how to love God and loving their neighbors as themselves. That was going to include treating other people with justice (treating people as God would treat them). It was going to entail healing the sick and feeding the hungry and clothing the naked, and turning the other cheek rather than responding to persecution with violence and revenge.

The second component in being a disciple was to devote themselves to “Fellowship.” Now, that’s a word that has been so watered down in today’s church as to be virtually indistinguishable from hanging around for coffee hour after church or showing up at a pot luck supper three or four times a year! What it meant for those earliest Christians was much more like what it means for the Community of Celebration! All things held in common, not a poor person among them, accepting all comers – even the outcasts and the marginalized. The word is “koinonia” in Greek and it means, according to New Testament scholar N.T. Wright, that:

“in Christ, Christians not only belong to one another but actually become mutually identified, truly rejoicing with the happy and genuinely weeping with the sad…Koinonia is part of the truth about the body of Christ. All are bound together in a mutual bond that makes our much-prized individualism look shallow and petty. This fundamental meaning of koinonia best explains its other uses, particularly that of “generosity” or “almsgiving”…Christians give to one another because they belong to one another.”

The third component of discipleship is “the breaking of the bread.” Originally that meant sharing meals with one another and with the poor but, after the sun had set on the Sabbath Day, it also meant sharing the Bread and Wine of the Eucharist with one another as Jesus had done at the Last Supper and as we are doing here tonight. It was to do as St. Paul had instructed in First Corinthians “For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes,” (I Corinthians 11:26)

And finally, the fourth component – they were to pray, to become people of prayer. The Old Testament patriarchs, matriarchs and prophets were people of prayer. Jesus was a man of prayer. The Apostles were becoming people of prayer, especially after they had received the Gift of the Holy Spirit on that Pentecost morning. How can we serve God and follow God’s will without communicating on a daily basis, two-way communication (offering our praise and thanks, confession, intercession and petition…and also sitting in silence and contemplation listening for that “still, small Voice” of the Master? I don’t see how we can.

So…three thousand baptized in a single day? Very cool. It has taken us 15 years to baptize that many in my diocese! But unless every one of those newly-baptized are also “discipled,” turned into real disciples of Christ, we might as well not have wasted the water!

“Brothers, what are we to do?” the congregation asked. “Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”

Yes, but if that Holy Spirit has been truly received, four things will be required: devotion to the Apostles’ teaching, true fellowship, the breaking of bread…and the prayers.

We are doing all four of those things in this service.

Thanks be to God!

A Freedom Meal for Servants

April 22, 2011

Maundy Thursday. If we had to come up with a caption, or a summary, for the events we are commemorating here tonight, it might be “a freedom meal for servants.” That may sound like an oxymoron so let me unpack what I mean.

Most scholars believe that the Last Supper Jesus ate with his disciples was a Passover Seder. They were observant Jews and would have taken special care to celebrate the Passover together every year. Tonight’s reading from Exodus tells us of the origins of that sacred meal: Moses and his people are preparing to pack up and escape the bonds of their slavery in Egypt after a long struggle with Pharaoh and the ruling authorities there.

Just before they go, Moses experiences God telling him to transform an ancient sheep-herder’s spring festival into a new “freedom meal.” The meal was called “pesah” which we usually translate “Passover” because of the story of the angel of death “passing over” the homes of the Jewish people that night. But it more likely means “have compassion on” or “protect.”

Just as God had “compassion on” and “protected” the early, nomadic Hebrew shepherds, now he was to have compassion on and protect the whole people of Israel from the Egyptians’ fury. So, just as in those earlier meals, they slaughter the spring lambs and share the meal among families. But this time, there are some changes to “the liturgy.” They spread the lambs’ blood over their doors to identify the children of Israel, and they eat the meal in haste – with their “loins girded, sandals on their feet, and staffs in their hands” – because their mad dash to freedom was about to begin!

The Jewish people have celebrated that Meal annually from that day until this in accordance with the Lord’s commandment: “This day shall be a day of remembrance for you. You shall celebrate it as a festival to the Lord; throughout your generations you shall observe it as a perpetual ordinance.” (Exodus 12:14)

And it was this that the Psalmist was singing about in tonight’s Psalm: “How shall I repay the Lord for all the good things he has done for me? I will lift up the cup of salvation and call upon the Name of the Lord. I will fulfill my vows to the Lord in the presence of all his people…O Lord, I am your servant and the child of your handmaid; you have freed me from my bonds. I will offer you the sacrifice of thanksgiving…” (Psalm 116 passim)

It was that meal too that Jesus was presiding over when he “changed the liturgy” once again! When he “lifted up the cup of salvation” he said, “This cup is the NEW covenant in MY blood. Do this as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” When he lifted up the unleavened bread and broke it in order to share it with his friends, he said, “This is MY body that is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” (I Corinthians 11:23-26 passim)

No longer was it the lamb’s blood spread over the doors that spoke of God’s “compassion.” Now, it was Jesus’ blood – the sacrifice of his life – that showed how much he loved them. No longer was it the unblemished lamb that provided spiritual food. Now, it was Jesus’ own Body, which he was prepared to offer for their protection…and for their liberation.

So, the Passover Seder is the freedom meal for the Jews. The Holy Eucharist is the freedom meal for Christians.

But just what kind of Christians are we called to be – we who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb?  Well, “during supper Jesus knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he had come from God and was going to God, got up from the table, took off his outer robe and tied a towel around himself. Then he poured water into a basin and began to wash the disciples’ feet…” (John 13:3-4)

I’ve always thought it so interesting that Christians follow Jesus’ command to “Do this in remembrance of me” every Sunday in countless churches around the world. We follow his example to wash one another’s feet only once a year – if that – on Maundy Thursday. I’m proud of Trinity Cathedral for being willing to share also in this ritual – a tradition of the Church for 2,000 years!

A freedom meal for servants!

St. Paul once wrote, “For freedom Christ has set us free.” (Galatians 5:1). God created us to be free, but we abused that freedom. God led the children of Israel out of slavery into freedom time and time again, but they often abused that freedom as well.

Jesus Christ came with a message of freedom and was prepared to lay down his life rather than compromise that message. But we have often compromised it. What we never seem to “get” is this: Freedom is not doing anything we want to do. That’s “license” not freedom. Real freedom is about “service” – serving God and serving one another.

There is a prayer which I say almost every day in the service of Morning Prayer, and it begins like this; “O God, the author of peace and lover of concord, to know you is eternal life and to serve you is perfect freedom…” If you really want to be free…start serving God.

This is the message of Maundy Thursday. The message Jesus was preparing himself to die for when he broke the Bread, shared the Cup, and washed his disciples’ feet. He knew that knowing God IS eternal life and that serving God is perfect freedom.

For freedom Christ has set us free, dear friends!

Welcome to this “freedom meal…for servants.”

Shine, Jesus, shine!

April 5, 2011

Lent 4A Trinity Cathedral.

Before I begin my remarks this morning, let me say that I was able to spend some time this last week with Bishop Zache Duracin of the Diocese of Haiti while I was at the House of Bishops’ meeting in N.C. I told him of our efforts here, and across this Diocese, to assist in “Rebuilding our Church in Haiti” and he asked me specifically to thank you and to let you know that you are in his prayers…as he remains in ours. So, thank you and if you have not made a contribution in one of our pew envelopes or the glass jar in the Great Hall, I invite you to do so today.

Now to the sermon: Even though we are in the “year of Matthew” in our Sunday lectionary this year, during Lent we have had selections from the Gospel of St. John and we have today the story of the healing of the man born blind – the sixth of Jesus’ seven “signs” or miracles as recorded in this 4th Gospel. There is not time in one sermon (or even one seminary-level class!) to explore all the symbolism in this account of Jesus’ healing of the man born blind.

There is almost nothing in St. John’s Gospel that does not have at least two or three levels of meaning! All the Gospel writers use symbolism, of course, but John was the most intentional about that and you are nearly always reading on a couple of levels at one time. This story is a perfect example. Before the symbolism starts in earnest, however, Jesus once again comes out against a common “theology of the times” which taught that illness and suffering are punishments from God. You still hear that taught sometimes even today. And sometimes, in our weaker moments, when we are suffering we may even think that: “what did I do to deserve this?”

But, as they come across this blind man, Jesus’ disciples ask, “Who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind? Jesus answered, Neither this man nor his parents sinned…” but his blindness can be an occasion for God’s works to be revealed! (John 9:1-3)  In this answer, Jesus doesn’t attempt to address all the issues involved in human suffering. We don’t know why “bad things happen to good people” but we know that it is not punishment for their sins or the sins of the parents!

Bad things happen to good people because the world we live in is not a perfect world. There is a fundamental brokenness or incompleteness in Creation, which is where accidents and disease and seemingly unjust suffering come from. We often say of such things, “It’s not fair.” But unfortunately “fairness” is not a feature of this fallen and broken world – some people are born in poverty, some of us are born in affluence; some people live in the path of tsunamis, others don’t; some people contract vicious and death-dealing illnesses, and some of us don’t. Life is not fair!

We don’t have the answers as to “why.” But we DO know that God’s grace can be powerfully at work in those situations – leading the rich to share with the poor; providing relief efforts after natural disasters; ministering to the sick and suffering and to their families and bringing such as healing into those situations as we can! And that is precisely what Jesus moved to do as he spat on the ground and made mud, spread the mud on the man’s eyes, and ordered him to go and wash in the pool of Siloam. “Then he went and washed,” the text tells us, “and came back able to see.”

Now, to the various levels in this story: The most obvious level is that Jesus was a healer and that, on more than one occasion, he restored sight to the blind. That gave the Apostles, and gives us in today’s Church, our mandate to pray for healing and to exercise a healing ministry such as we are engaged in in this parish.

The second level of symbolism, which could not possibly have been missed by the first readers of John’s Gospel, is that this is a story about Baptism! The Greek word for “spread” as when Jesus “spread” mud on the man’s eyes is the same as the word for “anoint.” In the early Church the baptismal candidates were anointed several times with oil, both before and after they were baptized. Just as King David was anointed with oil by Samuel in today’s Old Testament Lesson and Jesus is called the “anointed one” or “the Christ.” In this story, the man is “anointed,” then “washed” with water, and his eyes were opened!

Right after that, he and his whole family were pursued and harassed by the Pharisees and finally “driven out” of the synagogue. And that was precisely the experience of those early Christians who were reading John’s Gospel for the first time! They had been anointed, baptized, given “new sight” as they were born again in Holy Baptism, and then they – and often their whole families – suffered persecution both at the hands of the Jewish establishment and the Roman government, until finally the separation between synagogue and church became complete sometime early in the second century. They were “driven out.”

And there is yet a third kind of symbolism, which has to do with Jesus bringing light into darkness on every possible level. That is best described by the Epistle to the Ephesians this morning: The author writes, “Once you were darkness, but now in the Lord you are light. Live as children of light – for the fruit of the light is found in all that is good and right and true. Try to find out what is pleasing to the Lord. Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. For it is shameful even to mention what such people do secretly; but everything exposed by the light becomes visible, for everything that becomes visible is light. Therefore it says, “Sleeper, wake! Rise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you.” (Ephesians 5:8-14)

It is that profound sense of Jesus bringing light into our dark and fallen world that led Kathleen Thomerson to write the words to one of our most moving contemporary hymns, “I want to walk as a child of the light.” The refrain goes like this, “in him there is no darkness at all; the night and the day are both alike; the Lamb is the light of the city of God; Shine in my heart, Lord Jesus.”

Shine in our hearts indeed, Lord. Shine in our hearts throughout this Lenten season. Shine in our hearts as we walk the Way of the Cross on Good Friday (and in our individual lives). Shine in our hearts as we celebrate the Resurrection on Easter Day. And shine in our hearts on that last Great Day when we shall finally see that “the Lamb is the light of the city of God.”

Shine in our hearts…Lord Jesus!

Theological Education in The Episcopal Church

March 30, 2011

Our fnal day was highlighted with a first-ever meeting of the House of Bishops with all the seminary deans of The Episcopal Church (except one absent from illness). There is a House of Bishops Committee on Theological Education which serves as a kind of liaison with the seminaries, but this is the first time we have all met together.

Seminaries are, of course, struggling financially in our day. Seminarian debt is a huge issue because of the expense of a three year seminary experience. Many of us wonder if seminaries are not actually training people to serve in a church which no longer exists. And there is the long-standing “competition” and suspicion on the part of seminaries about diocesan training programs which have developed to train lay persons, deacons, and priests as alternatives to the seminary experience.

We heard a brief address from the President of the Seminary Deans and then brief vignettes of “good news” from each of the other 9 deans present about new initiatives in their schools. These ranged from distance learning to mergers to ecumenical cooperation to emphases on Latino ministries, to a desire for each of the seminaries to create their own “niche” or specialty so that they do not try to be all things for all people.

I do think the deans are aware of the problems and are trying, but in my opinion a number of key issues remain:

1. We have too many seminaries (11) for the size of our church (about 2 million members).

2. They have a tendency to think that the only way theological education can take place in community is in a residential seminary.

3. Issues of tenure may keep on older faculty members to the exclusion of raising up new and younger scholars to education a new generation.

4. Seminaries do not seem to teach”pedagogy” – they do not teach seminarians to teach.

I’m glad we began the conversation and hope it will continue because we have a long way to go before we reach at least my vision for theological education — which is that every Christian has the right to a full and equal theological education. Then, gifts and talents will deermine who gets ordained or serves in some specialized ministry – not the level of one’s training.

Anglican Covenant – Anglican Ecclesiology

March 29, 2011

This morning The Episcopal Church’s House of Bishops had another session discussing the proposed Anglican Covenant. Neil Alexander, Bishop of Atlanta and former seminary professor, delivered a brilliant paper on Anglican/Episcopal ecclesiology and raised the question about whether this proposed Covenant would substantially alter Anglican ecclesiology, specifically by inaugurating – for the first time – a more centralized authority than we have ever had before.

We were joined by three Primates – Archbishop Henri Isingoma of the Congo, Archbishop Paul Kim of Korea, and Archbishop Fred Hiltz of Canada. All three delivered responses to Neil’s paper and I was surprised to note that all three have serious reservations about the Covenant and whether it will indeed be of any use at all in resolving some of the conflict in the Anglican Communion.

There seems to be general agreement that Parts 1,2 and 3 of the Covenant are an acceptable description of Anglican history and ecclesiology but that Part 4 really does not accomplish its goal of providing a way constructively to manage or respond to disagreements across the Communion and may even perpetuate them. The Primate of Korea expressed his House of Bishops concern about the vestiges of “colonialism” in this section of the Covenant, with decisions being made about a local church (Province) outside that local church about its internal decisions.

Everyone present seems prepared to continue to discuss and work with the proposed Covenant but a number of bishops sugggested finding a  “third way” forward since many of us in the West, in Latin Amerca, and Asia are having trouble voting for it and since we have heard that the GAFCON (Global Anglican Future Conference) bishops in Africa have signaled that they will probably not sign on to it because it does not go far enough in “disciplining” churches such as ours and the Anglican Church in Canada with whom they do not agree.

All in all, it was a respectful and thoughtful conversation which should provide much grist for the mill as we move forward.

Stay tuned!

Who is my Neighbor? Islam and Christianity

March 28, 2011

Today our theme was “Who is my neighbor: Islam and Christianity.” Presenters included a Muslim scholar and former ambassador from Pakistan, Dr. Akbar Ahmed; Dr. William Sachs, an Episcopal priest now running an interfaith think-tank; and Ms. Eliza Grizwold, poet and journalist who has published an account of her seven years of reporting on the intersection of Christianity and Islam along “The Tenth Parallel” (the book’s title).

The morning was spent in presentations on the complexities and yet necessity of Christian-Muslim dialogue since over 60% of the world’s population are adherents of these two religions. As we approach the 10th anniversary of 9/11 prejudice, fear, and misunderstanding of Muslims seems only increasing in the United States and all speakers emphasized the need for us to counter this reality.

So often we hear “where are the moderate Muslim voices” to counter Al Quaida, the Taliban, etc. Today we were asked “Where are the moderate Christian voices to counter Glenn Beck, Franklin Graham and the other fear mongers who regularly demonize all Muslims for the sins of the extemists. Good question…

In the afternoon two models for our response were presented: Bishop Joe Burnett formerly of Nebraska spoke of the “Tri Faith Initiative’ in Omaha — where property has been purchased on which to construct a Jewish temple, an Episcopal Church, and a Muslim mosque sharing a common campus and built around what they call “the fourth building” which will be an interfaith center for dialogue, study, and social action together.

And Bishop Tom Shaw of Massachusetts told the story of how a community of 350 Muslims began praying in the crypt of the Cathedral in Boston – initially simply providing a safe space for them to pray, now developed into cooperative efforts for reconciliation and understanding in the wider community.

Dr.Ahmed encouraged us to pray for and support the exciting, but extemely fragile, uprisings across the Arab world and their search for democracy and human rights. No one knows how these ‘grass roots’ movements will turn our, since they are largely leaderless and somewhat unfocused. However, he believes they are a genuine human cry after so many years of oppression and domination by cruel tyrants.

Even if some fail, he believes these movements to be extremely significant not only for Islam, but for peace and justice in the world.

During the day he shared an amazing quote from the Prophet Mohammed who once said, “The ink of scholars is worth more than the blood of martyrs.” Why do we never hear this cited?

A “Sabbath Day” With the Moravians

March 28, 2011

Nice “sabbath” day on Sunday. We had Morning Prayer at 9, a brunch at 11:30, and a free afternoon. I continued my Lenten reading in N.T. Wright, Marcus Borg, and Jon Dominic Crossan New Testament Studies. And…took a nap.

This evening we had a “Fireside Chat” with the Presiding Bishop which is one of the private conversations on which we are not to “report” since they are of a confidential nature. But…there were no “blockbusters” and the tone was basically upbeat and positive.

We concluded the evening with a Moravian service of worship, presided over by five Moravain bishops of the Southern Province. As is typical, it was deeply prayerful with lots of singing, a humble and prayerful spirit, and with a focus on the unity of the Church for which Christ prayed.

The five bishops were robed in beautiful and generous surplices, the Eucharistic prayer complete with a rehearsal of salvation history, epiclesis, and words of institution. Communion was adminstered to us in the pews and we all retained the elements until everyone was served and then we all received together.

I heard no complaints about the blood of Christ being received as grape juice in tiny cups (although I’m sure there were some). However, the palpable devotion and orthodox prayers probably led most to believe that this was indeed “The Body of Christ, the Bread of Heaven” and “the Blood of Christ, the Cup of Salvation.”

We need to learn from each other’s traditions, be open to grow and change, and realize that — as the Moravians often say — we need “unity in essentials, tolerance in non-essentials, and love in everything.”

The House of Bishops experienced that tonght…

The Episcopal Church and Young Adults

March 26, 2011

Very good day discussing ministry to and with young adults at the House of Bishops today. We were led by Lisa Kimball from the Virginia Theological Seminary, a young priest named Arrington Chambliss from the Diocese of Massachusetts, and a young lay person named Jason Long also from that Diocese.

Care was taken not to treat young adults as “a demographic” and to start with the fact that they are children of God and that we have an awful lot more in common than we have differences, even though they do inhabit a radically different environment than most of the bishops in this House grew up in.

We did start with one of Beloit College’s Mindset Lists which helps sketch out some of those differences for “the Class of 2014.”  We shared the results of conversations many of us were asked to have with some young adults in our dioceses. Interest in spiritual practices, a passion for social justice and inclusion, and a disgust for hypocrisy and judgmentalism were common responses many of us received.

In the afternoon we heard presentations on the Episcopal Service Corps program present in sixteen or seventeen of our dioceses. These are young adults committed to work for social justice, deep their spiritual awareness and discern vocation, develop leadership skills, and live a simple, sustainable lifestyle — all done often in intentional communities. We also heard examples of “fresh expressions” of the faith and the emergent conversation which continues both here and abroad.

We concluded in a guided meditation called “The Walk into the Future” where we were asked to envision what the future of ministry to and with young adults might look like in 2 or 3 years if we really got started and what first steps we might take to get there. We then shared those in small groups and, by post-it notes around the room, with everyone. 

In short, many of us believe that The Episcopal Church is positioned to enrich, and be enriched by, the lives of many of the these young people — but it will take commitment, flexibility, risk-taking, and the willingness to fail — as well as to succeed — to make it happen.

All in all…a good day.